Objection to New Sub-Processors. We will give you the opportunity to object to the engagement of new Sub-Processors on reasonable grounds relating to the protection of Personal Data within 30 days of notifying you in accordance with the ‘Sub-Processors’ section. If you do notify us of such an objection, the parties will discuss your concerns in good faith with a view to achieving a commercially reasonable resolution. If no such resolution can be reached, we will, at our sole discretion, either not appoint the new Sub-Processor, or permit you to suspend or terminate the affected Subscription Service in accordance with the termination provisions of the Agreement without liability to either party (but without prejudice to any fees incurred by you prior to suspension or termination). The parties agree that by complying with this sub-section (d), Workzoom fulfils its obligations under Sections 9 of the Standard Contractual Clauses.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. Customer may object to Entrust’s use of a new Sub- processor by notifying Entrust in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Entrust’s communication advising of the new Sub-processor. In the event Customer reasonably objects to the use of a new Sub-processor, Entrust will use reasonable efforts to address Customer’s objections. If Entrust is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period, which shall not exceed ninety (90) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Agreement with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Entrust without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Entrust. Entrust will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. Controller may object to Processor’s use of a new Sub- processor by notifying Processor in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of a communication from Processor advising of the new Sub-processor. In the event Controller has a reasonable objection to the use of a new Sub-processor, Processor will make reasonable efforts to address the objections. If Processor is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period, which shall not exceed ninety (90) days, Controller may terminate the applicable Agreement with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Processor without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Controller. Processor will refund Controller any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Controller.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. Entrust may object to Partner’s use of a new Sub-processor by notifying Partner in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Partner’s communication advising of the new Sub-processor. In the event Entrust reasonably objects to the use of a new Sub-processor, Partner will use reasonable efforts to address Entrust’s objections. If Partner is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period, which shall not exceed ninety (90) days, Entrust may, in its full discretion, terminate the applicable Agreement in full or with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Partner without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Partner. Partner will refund Entrust any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Entrust.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. When HRForecast intends to retain a new Sub-Processor, it will notify Customer at least 30 days in advance (“New Sub-processor Notice”). If Customer has legitimate reason under Data Protection Law to object to the use of such Sub-Processor, Customer may object the use of a new Sub-Processor within 30 days of the notice; the notice is required to state the legitimate reasons; in such case HRForecast will take commercially reasonable effort to provide the Services to Customer without using such Sub-Processor, in case HRForecast fails to do so within 30 days, Customer has the right to terminate with a notice period of no more than 30 days solely the respective Service by providing notice without undue delay and HRForecast will reimburse prepaid fees for the part Service terminated in line with this provision; in case such termination is not notified within 60 days of the New Sub-processor Notice, Controller is deemed not to have objected the Sub-Processor and the general autorisation applies.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. Should Entrust reasonably object to and withhold approval of Partner’s use of a new Sub-processor, Partner will use reasonable efforts to address Entrust’s objections. If Partner is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period, which shall not exceed ninety (90) days, Entrust may, in its full discretion, terminate the applicable Agreement.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. If the Customer has a legitimate reason under data protection law to object to the processing of Personal Data by the new sub-processor(s) for the provision of MOXIS Cloud Service under the Agreement, the Customer may terminate the Agreement by giving written notice to XiTrust, Attn: Data Protection Coordinator, within 30 days from the date of XiTrust's notice of the new Sub-Processor, effective on a date specified by the Customer. If the Customer does not terminate the contract within the 30-day period, the new sub-processor shall be deemed to have been approved by the Customer. Any termination under this provision shall be deemed by the parties to be without fault.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. Vendor will provide written notification of new Sub-Processors to Client before authorizing any new Sub-Processor to Process Client Data in connection with the provision of the applicable Services. If Client notifies Vendor within 10 days of such notification of any Client objections (on reasonable grounds) to the proposed appointment: (i) Vendor will work with Client in good faith to make available a commercially reasonable change in the provision of the Services which avoids the use of that proposed Sub-Processor; or (ii) where a change cannot be made within 30 days from Vendor’s receipt of Client’s objection, notwithstanding anything in the Agreement, Client may terminate the Agreement to the extent that it relates to the Services that require the use of the proposed Sub-Processor.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. If, within 30 days after notice of a new Sub- Processor, Customer notifies SaaS Provider in writing that Customer objects to SaaS Provider’s appointment of such new Sub-Processor based on reasonable data protection concerns, the parties will discuss such concerns in good faith.
Objection to New Sub-Processors. Processor shall provide notification of any intended new Sub-processor(s). Customer may reasonably object to Processor’s use of a new Sub- processor, for reasons relating to the protection of Personal Data intended to be Processed by such Sub-processor, by notifying Processor promptly in writing within seven (7) days after receipt of a Processor notification. Such written objection shall include the reasons for objecting to Processor’s use of such new Sub-processor. Failure to object to such new Sub- processor in writing within seven (7) days following Processor’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the new Sub-Processor. In the event Customer reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentences, Processor will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If Processor is unable to make available such change within thirty (30) days, Customer may, as a sole remedy, terminate the applicable Agreement and this DPA with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Processor without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor, by providing written notice to Processor. All amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date with respect to the Processing at issue shall be duly paid to Processor. Until a decision is made regarding the new Sub-processor, Processor may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Personal Data and/or suspend access to the Account. Customer will have no further claims against Processor due to the termination of the Agreement (including, without limitation, requesting refunds) and/or the DPA in the situation described in this paragraph.
