Further Recommendations Sample Clauses

Further Recommendations. Instructions for completing Attachment F Final Project Report Form: DEP AGREEMENT NO.: This is the number on your grant agreement. GRANTEE NAME: Enter the name of the grantee’s agency. PROJECT TITLE: Enter the title shown on the first page of the grant agreement. MONTH & YEAR: Enter month and year of publication The final Project Report must contain the following sections: Executive Summary, Methodology, Outcome, and Further Recommendations. The Final Project Report must comply with the publication requirements in the grant agreement. Please limit the final project report to no more than five (5) pages. One electronic copy shall be submitted to the Department’s Grant Manager for approval. Final payment will be held until receipt and approval of the Final Project Report. Questions regarding completion of the Final Project Report should be directed to the Department’s Grant Manager, identified in paragraph 18 of this agreement. Florida Department of Environmental Protection EXHIBIT G PHOTOGRAPHER RELEASE FORM FOR PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOS, AUDIO RECORDINGS AND ARTWORKS DEP AGREEMENT NO: 22PLN30 RELEASE FORM FOR PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOS, AUDIO RECORDINGS AND ARTWORKS Owner/Submitter’s Name: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone Number: ( ) Email: License and Indemnification I certify that I am the owner of the photograph(s), video(s), audio recording(s) and/or artwork(s) being submitted and am eighteen (18) years of age or older. I hereby grant to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection the royalty-free and non-exclusive right to distribute, publish and use the photograph(s), video(s), audio recording(s) and art work(s) submitted herewith (the “Work”) to promote the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Uses may include, but are not limited to:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Further Recommendations. The study was restricted mainly by the recourses available and the limited time. Some suggestions are proposed for the future work. ▪ Coding work: This part is carried out based on the understanding of some accident reports and might be aspects which were omitted. A more correct structure will help a better coding of lifeboat accidents and provide useful information for the later work. ▪ Bayesian Network Development: Up to now, there is no available statistics on lifeboat accidents. Hence, no further lifeboat accident rates of different causal factors can be estimated. The causal relationships were only based on the subjective judgment. More detailed BBNs could be constructed assisting with more variables. By realizing this, a better understanding of what actually are the dominating factors that influence the lifeboat safety could be determined. ▪ Variable States: For the simple calculation, variable states were restricted to only three conditions- negative, no influence and positive. In the actual case, results would be quite different if we adjust or add the variable states. As a fact of this, the 6 variable states which were mentioned in the reference article could be accepted. Concurrently, a higher requirement for coding the accident data. ▪ Quantitative Analysis of Human and Organizational Factors: The last chapter has already proposed a structure for classifying and analyzing human factors. Some of the researches also proposed different methods to give quantitative analysis of human factors. A similar study could also be conducted. REFERENCES
Further Recommendations. The study concludes with a series of recommendations, mainly summarising the main points of the analysis as set out above, but also highlighting three further issues that had been referred to in passing: • special care should be taken to ensure that indicators do not actually inhibit the effective implementation of policy; • although indicators must keep in line with the evolving policy framework, a certain amount of stability is desirable, if only to facilitate comparisons across the different time periods during which a policy is pursue; • it could be helpful to all concerned if a clear position were established on the extent of the resources that are available for evaluation purposes at the level of specific measures. This document contains the Final Report submitted by the Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services (CSES) LLP in respect of the assignment: ‘Evaluation of the Indicators of the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme’. It provides an assessment of the general framework of indicators used by the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme.
Further Recommendations. After the discussion of the proposals contained in the Interim Report, it is now appropriate to formulate a final set of recommendations. These are as follows: • A distinction should be made in the elaboration of the indicators used for the EIP between the operational requirements for the effective management of the Programme and the grounds for developing a clear assessment of performance against the declared objectives of the Programme. • The current system is dominated by the former considerations and should be replaced by a system clearly targeted at providing a clear assessment of performance against the declared objectives. Proposed set of indicators and 4 recommendations • Any assessment of performance should make reference to the established evaluation framework and the classic evaluation criteria, in particular. • A statement should be made of the overall objectives of the indicator system, possibly along the lines suggested in section 4.1. • One of these objectives should be the clear communication of the achievements of the Programme, by way of discharging the requirements of accountability and addressing the legitimate interest of all stakeholders. • It could be helpful to all concerned if a clear position were established on the extent of the resources that are available for evaluation purposes at the level of specific measures. • A factor inhibiting a clear overview of performance is the sheer number of indicators currently being used. This number should be reduced. • The emphasis in the new indicator set should be shifted towards results and longer-term outcomes as opposed to outputs. • It is suggested that a series of overarching indicators be developed alongside those proposed, providing a context for the more detailed indicators, and reflecting issues that are at the core of enterprise and innovation policy. • Indicators should support policy implementation and development as part of an active evaluation culture. • Special care should be taken to ensure that indicators do not actually inhibit the effective implementation of policy.
Further Recommendations. Describe any future plans to build on the project, monitor project benefits. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FINAL PROJECT REPORT FORM GRANTEE NAME: Enter the name of the grantee’s agency. PROJECT TITLE: Enter the Title shown on the first page of the grant agreement. NOAA AWARD NUMBER: Enter the NOAA award number as shown on the first page of the grant agreement. MONTH & YEAR: Enter month and year of publication.
Further Recommendations. The committee concluded that the context of historic arches in Portsmouth is not necessarily the strongest argument for an arch as many were temporary, and even the more permanent looking ones are no longer standing. Creating dynamic spaces, connecting neighborhoods, improving pedestrian and vehicle traffic flow and safety and enhancing aesthetics of downtown seem to carry more weight. ● We recognize and appreciate the level of expertise that Xxx Xxxxx brings to the project. It is a real advantage to have someone so knowledgeable involved. He brings skill in the areas of construction and presentation before the various boards and committees and an understanding of the nuances of working through the city’s approval process. It would be our recommendation that you maximize the advantage that offers, perhaps placing him in a visible role as a leader in some of the key presentations. It is common for a representative to speak on behalf of a client before boards and commissions-the presence of someone with Xxx’s expertise lends weight and credibility to the project and the fact that he is not directly tied to the arts organization would add a perceived element of objectivity to the overall proposal. ● In terms of the approval process with the City (HDC in particular), we believe that presenting the goals and thought process of the project will serve to be better than presenting a design that seems final. Dialog and a feedback process through a few work sessions will be important. ATTACHMENT 3 Summary Communication Regarding Historic District Commission’s Project Review ATTACHMENT 4 Proposed Partnership Description and Images Chestnut Street Streetscape Improvement A Music Hall/City of Portsmouth Collaboration An unwelcoming street leads to major city treasures Sidewalks always icy in winter because of poor drainage Both the Music Hall and the African Burying Ground are hard to find from downtown Heaving, pitched sidewalks Perilously placed utility pole Awkward access for pedestrians, school buses, and handicap patrons and cars Chestnut is a side street that is dark and dangerous for the 100,000+ residents and visitors that come to The Music Hall and use it as access to the African Burying Ground UTILITY POLE RESTRICTS TURNING OF BUSES AND DELIVERY TRUCKS The only existing site amenity – planter box / sitting wall View to residential parking; Utility pole Difficult sidewalks and access SLOPE STEP STEP FLUSH STEP FLUSH STEP The Music Hall as a partner with the ...
Further Recommendations. The Committee reviewed other existing loaning practices within SCLS and made the following related recommendations:  BULK LOANS In their investigation, the Committee learned that some libraries provide bulk loans of their own materials to other libraries. In such instances, the loaning library should create a separate card for each such library and use the patron category “bulk loan”. Such loans should be limited to materials owned by the loaning library.  LINK EXPRESS A fee-based service managed by SCLS Delivery, this makes possible the direct delivery of LINKcat materials to schools, organizations, and businesses. Currently, each LINK Express customer uses Patron Category LINK EXPRESS which has the same limitations and restrictions as the ADULT patron category. It is recommended that o SCLS provide checkout data annually that identifies the number of LINK EXPRESS checkouts in that year to each LINK EXPRESS customer along with their taxing jurisdiction. The library within each taxing jurisdiction may add the relevant circulation to their annual circulation on their annual report.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Further Recommendations

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The literature review (see Appendix C) indicates a range of buffer width recommendations for protecting the shade function. Based on the XXXXX curve reported in this section of the report, approximately 1 SPTH (estimated at 61 meters or 200 ft) will provide nearly 100 percent effectiveness of the buffer to protect the intertidal from desiccation, elevated temperatures, and other shade-related functions. Of course, in nonforested community types (e.g., prairie and grasslands) the shade function from overstory trees may be unattainable. To maximize the buffer’s effectiveness to provide the shade function, the following actions are recommended: • Avoid disturbance to native vegetation in riparian areas, especially nearer the water’s edge. • Retain, restore, and enhance mature trees and a multi-layered canopy and understory of native vegetation at sites that support these types of plant communities. • Ensure that riparian areas can be maintained in mature, native vegetation through time. • Prevent modifications to banks and bluffs (e.g., armoring) that could disrupt natural processes (such as soil creep, development of backshore and overhanging vegetation, recruitment of wood and other organic matter to riparian area including beaches and banks.) • Prohibit cutting and topping of trees and avoid “limbing” (selective branch cutting to enhance views) of trees for view corridors and other purposes within buffers.

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) The Company hereby consents to the Offer and represents, as of the date of this Agreement, that the Company Board, at a meeting duly called and held, has unanimously made the Company Board Recommendation. Subject in each case to Section 6.1(b), the Company hereby consents to the inclusion of a description of the Company Board Recommendation in the Offer Documents and, during the Pre-Closing Period, neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) (A) fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), or publicly propose to fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), the Company Board Recommendation or (B) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or publicly propose to approve, recommend, endorse or declare advisable, any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) fail to include the Company Board Recommendation in the Schedule 14D-9 when disseminated to the Company’s stockholders (any action described in clause (i) or (ii) being referred to as a “Company Adverse Change Recommendation”), (iii) publicly make any recommendation in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer (other than the Offer) other than a recommendation against such offer or (iv) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or propose to approve, recommend or declare advisable, or allow the Company to execute or enter into any Contract (other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal requiring, or reasonably expected to cause, the Company to abandon, terminate, delay or fail to consummate, or that would otherwise materially impede, interfere with or be inconsistent with, the Transactions.

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Change of Recommendation Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company’s Board of Directors may, if it concludes in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, make an Adverse Recommendation Change; provided that prior to any such Adverse Recommendation Change, (A) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub prompt written notice advising them of (x) the decision of the Company’s Board of Directors to take such action and the reasons therefor and (y) in the event the decision relates to an Alternative Transaction Proposal, a summary of the material terms and conditions of the Alternative Transaction Proposal and other information requested to be provided with respect thereto pursuant to this Section 5.4, including the information required to be provided pursuant to Section 5.4(b) and (c), (B) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub three (3) Business Days (the “Notice Period”) after delivery of each such notice to propose revisions to the terms of this Agreement (or make another proposal) and, during the Notice Period, the Company shall, and shall direct its financial advisors and outside legal advisors to, negotiate with Parent in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that, if applicable, such Alternative Transaction Proposal ceases to constitute (in the judgment of the Company’s Board of Directors, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors), a Superior Proposal or, if the Adverse Recommendation Change does not involve an Alternative Transaction Proposal, to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise not necessary, and (C) the Company’s Board of Directors shall have determined in good faith, after considering the results of such negotiations and giving effect to the proposals made by Parent and Merger Sub, if any, that such Alternative Transaction Proposal, if applicable, continues to constitute a Superior Proposal or that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise still required; provided further that, (1) if during the Notice Period described in clause (B) of this paragraph any revisions are made to the Superior Proposal, if applicable, and the Company’s Board of Directors in its good faith judgment determines (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that such revisions are material (it being understood that any change in the purchase price or form of consideration in such Superior Proposal shall be deemed a material revision), the Company shall deliver a new written notice to Parent and shall comply with the requirements of this Section 5.4(d) with respect to such new written notice except that the new Notice Period shall be two (2) Business Days instead of three (3) Business Days and (2) in the event the Company’s Board of Directors does not make the determination referred to in clause (C) of this paragraph but thereafter determines to make an Adverse Recommendation Change pursuant to this Section 5.4(d), the procedures referred to in clauses (A), (B) and (C) above shall apply anew and shall also apply to any subsequent withdrawal, amendment or change.

  • Recommendations This matter has been reviewed and approved by the Medical School Conflict of Interest Board. In light of this disclosure and our finding that the Agreement was negotiated in conformance with standard University practices, I recommend that the Board of Regents approve the University’s entering into this Agreement with The Hope Foundation. Respectfully submitted, X. Xxxx Xx

  • Recommendation The Sheriff recommends approval of the Board Order. The County Administrator concurs with the recommendation of the Sheriff. Should the Board of Commissioners concur with their recommendations, approval of the Board Order will implement that action. Respectfully submitted, /s/ XXXXX XXXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxx County Administrator

  • Filings; Other Actions (a) As promptly as reasonably practicable after consummation of the Offer, if required, the Company shall prepare and file with the SEC the Company Proxy Statement, and Parent and the Company shall cooperate with each other in connection with the preparation of the Company Proxy Statement. The Company will use its reasonable best efforts to have the Company Proxy Statement cleared by the staff of the SEC as promptly as reasonably practicable after such filing. The Company will use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Company Proxy Statement to be mailed to the Company’s shareholders as promptly as reasonably practicable after the Company Proxy Statement is cleared by the staff of the SEC. The Company shall as promptly as reasonably practicable notify Parent of the receipt of any oral or written comments from the staff of the SEC relating to the Company Proxy Statement. The Company shall cooperate and provide Parent with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on (i) the draft of the Company Proxy Statement (including each amendment or supplement thereto) and (ii) all written responses to requests for additional information by and replies to written comments of the staff of the SEC, prior to filing of the Company Proxy Statement with or sending such to the SEC, and the Company will provide to Parent copies of all such filings made and correspondence with the SEC or its staff with respect thereto. Concurrently with the preparation and filing of the Company Proxy Statement, the Parties shall jointly prepare and file with the SEC the Schedule 13E-3 with respect to the Merger. The Parties shall cooperate and consult with each other in preparation of the Schedule 13E-3, including, without limitation, furnishing to the others the information relating to it required by the Exchange Act to be set forth in the Schedule 13E-3. Each Party shall use its reasonable best efforts to resolve all SEC comments with respect to the Schedule 13E-3 and any other required filings as promptly as practicable after receipt thereof. Each Party agrees to promptly correct any information provided by it for use in the Schedule 13E-3 which shall have become false or misleading. If at any time prior to the Effective Time, any information should be discovered by any party hereto which should be set forth in an amendment or supplement to the Company Proxy Statement or Schedule 13E-3 so that the Company Proxy Statement or Schedule 13E-3 would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, the party which discovers such information shall promptly notify the other parties hereto and, to the extent required by applicable Law, an appropriate amendment or supplement describing such information shall be promptly filed by the Company with the SEC and disseminated by the Company to the shareholders of the Company; provided, however, that prior to such filing, the Company and Parent as the case may be, shall consult with the other Party with respect to such amendment or supplement and shall afford the other Party and their Representatives reasonable opportunity to comment thereon.

  • Filings; Other Actions; Notification (a) The Company and Parent shall, subject to Sections 6.2 and 6.3, cooperate with each other and use, and shall cause their respective Subsidiaries to use, their respective reasonable best efforts to take or cause to be taken all actions, and do or cause to be done all things, necessary, proper or advisable under this Agreement and applicable Laws and Orders to consummate and make effective the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement as expeditiously as possible, including (i) preparing and filing all documentation to effect all necessary notices, reports and other filings (and in any event, by filing within ten (10) Business Days after the date of this Agreement the notifications, filings and other information required to be filed under the HSR Act and as promptly as practicable in the case of all other filings required under any Foreign Competition Laws with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby, which are set forth Section 7.1(b)(ii) of the Company Disclosure Letter) and to obtain as expeditiously as possible all consents, registrations, approvals, permits, expirations of waiting periods and authorizations necessary or advisable to be obtained from any third party and/or any Governmental Entity in order to consummate the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) satisfying the conditions to consummating the Merger, (iii) defending any lawsuits or other legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging this Agreement or the consummation of the Merger, (iv) obtaining (and cooperating with each other in obtaining) any consent, approval of, waiver or any exemption by, any non-governmental third party, in each case, to the extent necessary, proper or advisable in connection with the Merger and (v) executing and delivering any reasonable additional instruments necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and to fully carry out the purposes of this Agreement.

  • Comments Licensee will ensure that neither libellous nor blasphemous language appears in the Comments and will be responsible for the removal of Comments.

  • Stockholders Approval (a) Company shall, as soon as practicable following consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement, submit this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby for the approval of its stockholders at a meeting of stockholders (the "Company Stockholders Meeting", which term shall include any postponements or adjournments of such meeting). Unless otherwise required under the applicable fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors of Company, as determined by such directors in good faith after consultation with and based upon the opinion of outside legal counsel, Company shall (i) recommend adoption of this Agreement and approval of the Merger by the stockholders of Company and include in the Proxy Statement such recommendation and (ii) use all reasonable best efforts to solicit from its respective stockholders proxies in favor of adoption of this Agreement and approval of the Merger and shall take all other action necessary or advisable to secure the vote or consent of stockholders to obtain such approvals (the "Company Stockholder Approval"). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Company agrees that its obligations pursuant to the first sentence of this Section 4.5 shall not be affected by (i) the commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or communication to Company of any Acquisition Proposal (as defined in Section 4.8) or (ii) the withdrawal or modification by the Board of Directors of the Company of its approval or recommendation of this Agreement or the Merger. The Company Stockholders Meeting shall be held as soon as practicable following consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement. To the extent permitted by law, Childs, Acquiror Parent and Acquiror each agree to vote all shares of Company Common Stock beneficially owned by them in favor of the Merger.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.