Factor 4, Past Performance. (i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: If a completed CPARS evaluation is available for each project submitted in response to Factor 1, it shall be submitted with the proposal. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. An offeror shall not submit a PPQ when a completed CPARS is available. If a CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (provided as an attachment), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Xxxx Xxxx, via email at xxxx.xxxx@xxxx.xxx (with a copy to Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxx.x.xxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx) prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.
Factor 4, Past Performance. The past performance evaluation provides an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the RFP requirements. The past performance evaluation considers the Offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the intent of this RFP’s requirement. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the Offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the Offeror is to this RFP requirement. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The Government will review this past performance information and determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance confidence assessment.
Factor 4, Past Performance. The Government will evaluate how well the Offeror has performed on contracts that have been determined to be both recent and relevant to the PWS. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality of performance:
Factor 4, Past Performance. M.3.6.1. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s and its teaming partner’s recent and relevant past performance to determine the Offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2), the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, general trends in contractor’s performance, and compliance with FAR 52.219-8 and FAR 52.219-9 (as applicable) shall be considered. Proposals that do not contain the information requested in this section risk rejection or a less than acceptable performance rating by the Government. All past performance comments received will be taken into account and could affect the overall rating. The overall past performance evaluation is a subjective decision based on the whole of all data received. These are combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each Offeror.
Factor 4, Past Performance. Each offeror’s past performance will be reviewed to determine whether the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. This assessment shall be based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information pertaining to the services outlined in the solicitation and a determination of how well the offeror performed on those contracts. The Past Performance Factor will be assigned a rating of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable.”
Factor 4, Past Performance. Each offeror’s past performance proposal will be rated as either “Acceptable or Unacceptable” and is based on an assessment of the past performance submitted by the offeror and the Government’s expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the services described in the solicitation. The Government will evaluate whether the offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the services the prime or major subcontractor is expected to perform as described in the solicitation. The Government will also evaluate how well the offeror performed on the contracts detailed in the offeror’s proposal. Offerors shall submit the same efforts under the Past Performance Factor that are identified and submitted under the Experience Factor. DRAFT Note: In order for an Offeror to rely on the past performance of the Offeror’s parent, sister, subsidiary or an affiliate company, the Offeror shall identify the relevant parent, sister, subsidiary company or affiliate company as Major Subcontractor in its proposal and identify what portion of the work that entity will perform under this contract (must be at least ten (10) percent (%) or more of the total proposed price for this effort). The Experience factor will be evaluated as “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. The Government will focus its evaluation on the forms and questionnaires provided by the offeror in its proposal and may consider data obtained from third parties or other sources. This includes data in Government files or data obtained through interviews with personnel familiar with the contractor and their current and past performance in performing Government contracts for same or similar services that are relevant and recent. Under this factor, the Government may evaluate third party references provided as to each Offerors and major subcontractor’s relevant and recent efforts, to verify the probability of successful accomplishment of the required effort. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar in scope and complexity to the portion(s) of the PWS that the prime offeror or applicable major subcontractor is proposing to perform. Recent efforts are defined as those performed during the last five (5) years, from the issue date of this RFP. Offerors shall be deemed to have satisfied requirements of the past performance factor wh...
