Background & Objective Sample Clauses

Background & Objective. The White River Partnership (WRP) consists of a collection of private and public entities working together to develop and implement a comprehensive approach toward the conservation of a healthy riparian ecosystem for the White River and tributaries in both Colorado and Utah. In 2016, the WRP (the Partnership) held its first official stakeholder meeting to initiate increased communication and information sharing between local and regional entities already working on natural resource related issues along the White River in Utah and Colorado. At this meeting, an informal survey was conducted to better assess the needs of attendees to help conduct their work more effectively, and the level of interest among attendees in developing a formal partnership to further facilitate the sharing of resources and information. Attendees agreed that formalizing the Partnership would be advantageous to all and that could be achieved by formalizing the Partnership in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). This document codifies the formation of a partnership to address riparian resource challenges: The White River Partnership. In Utah, lands directly adjacent to the White River are predominantly federal public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Tribal lands also comprise a significant portion of land ownership in Utah along the White River. There are some state trust lands managed by the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (XXXXX), and some small pockets of privately-owned lands. The whole of the White River in Utah is contained in Uintah County. In Colorado, lands adjacent to the White River are predominantly privately owned, with small pockets of BLM lands. The Towns of Rangely and Meeker also own a small portion of land along the White River, and some lands are managed by Colorado Parks and Wildlife. While most of the White River watershed in Colorado is in Rio Xxxxxx County, a small portion of the headwaters occur in Garfield County. Riparian ecological health affects substantial portions of the landscape, both natural and developed resources. Of primary concern along the White River corridor are the significant infestations of the woody invasive species Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) and to a lesser extent tamarisk (Tamarisk spp.) because of their negative impacts on plant and wildlife diversity, wildlife and stream habitats, wildland fire fuels accumulation and hazard, and recreational and cultural use of the river. Significant i...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Background & Objective. In January 2015, Nueces County received a grant to acquire 3,680 acres of undeveloped land on Padre Island in northern Kleberg County. Prior to acquisition, the property was owned by the Texas General Land Office which purchased it through a Federal Highway Administration grant in 1995. Since then, the land has been unmanaged with practically no law enforcement and has been subjected to illegal dumping, recreational shooting with suspected lead munitions, and indiscriminant vehicular traffic in dunes and wetlands. The full extent of these uncontrolled impacts has not been quantified, but may be affecting the hydrology, flora, and fauna needed to sustain healthy wetland ecosystems; infringing upon the critical habitat of endangered species and placing uncontrolled contaminants into the environment. The availability of CBBEP funds will help Nueces County augment existing federal and state regulatory compliance by developing scientifically based and locally enforceable ordinances to protect environmentally sensitive areas and manage the currently uncontrolled recreational uses. The new property is very valuable ecologically. It borders Padre Island National Seashore and contains approximately 6 miles of gulf beaches, 2.3 miles of estuarine mud flats and Laguna Madre shoreline, freshwater emergent wetlands, large expanses of coastal prairie, and other barrier island habitats. According to the Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC), the property potentially supports many threatened, endangered, or rare species known to occur on Padre Island and contains designated critical habitat for the piping plover, a Federal and State-listed threatened species. Other Federal and State-listed endangered and/or threatened species within the subject area include the Xxxx’x Xxxxxx sea turtle, green sea turtle, hawksbill sea turtle, leatherback sea turtle, loggerhead sea turtle, red knot, northern aplomado falcon, and Xxxxxxx’x pipit. In addition, many State-listed threatened and/or rare species are known to occur on Padre Island. The Coastal Parks Department of Nueces County is committed to the conservation of these threatened, endangered, and rare species. Aside from listed species, examples of other resources and issues that need to be addressed in the site’s habitat management plan include freshwater wetlands (which are rapidly being impacted by development in other areas of the barrier island) and the need to control invasive species such as Brazilian pepper...
Background & Objective. The City of Pueblo is seeking proposals for professional services contract for the surveying, engineering, and platting of a four (4) lot subdivision and related rights-of-way, as well as vacating several streets within the proposed subdivision as outlined in the Scope of Services.
Background & Objective. The following requirements are for a Maintenance of On-Board Video Surveillance System (OBVSS) between City and Contractor. The equipment for maintenance includes a Bus Security Camera System comprised of fixed onboard cameras and digital video recorders (DVRs) with removable storage. Any OBVSS out of warranty or falling out of warranty during the term of Resultant Agreement (having the meaning “the final contract embodying all contract documents, terms, conditions and obligations”) shall be covered under this Attachment. Contractor shall provide pricing for the vehicles falling out warranty appropriately. Contractor shall also ensure there are enough technicians to perform the work as the fleet size increases or ages and shall add or remove technicians as needed. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Contracted repairs and services will be covered under the Resultant Agreement. The objective of this SOW is to preserve and maintain the OBVSS system in a complete and continually functioning condition for which the system was designed. To support this goal, Contractor shall ensure that the maintenance and repair services described in this scope are of the outmost quality, and repairs are performed per manufacturer specifications and in a timely fashion to get the system back to the green operational status light. Sub-standard services shall be considered a breach or failure to perform, and the City reserves the right to terminate the SOW for default. Contractor shall coordinate closely with City personnel on all work orders for best times and locations to perform services so as not to disrupt the normal functions of City operations and existing OBVSS system or have parts of the existing OBVSS system non-operational. The Contractor agrees to provide the post-warranty maintenance, repair, and support services for the City’s fleet of vehicles as specified in this SOW.

Related to Background & Objective

  • BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The partnership proposed by the Cooperator was selected due to merit review evaluations from the 2017 Notice of Funding Opportunity P17AS00037. The Cooperator demonstrated expertise in disciplines and subject areas of relevance to cooperative research and training. The Cooperator met the program interests of NPS with expertise, facilities, experience, diversity of programs, and history of collaborative research projects. The Cooperator helps the NPS-CESU to meet its objectives to:  Provide research, technical assistance and education to NPS for land management, and research;  Develop a program of research, technical assistance and education that involves the biological, physical, social, and cultural sciences needed to address resources issues and interdisciplinary problem-solving at multiple scales and in an ecosystem context at the local, regional, and national level; and  Place special emphasis on the working collaboration among NPS, universities, and their related partner institutions. Title: Provide research, technical assistance and education for resource management and research The CESU network seeks to provide scientifically-based information on the nature and status of selected biological, physical, and cultural resources occurring within the parks in a form that increases its utility for making management decisions, conducting scientific research, educating the public, developing effective monitoring programs, and developing management strategies for resource protection. Studying the resources present in NPS parks benefits the Cooperator’s goal of advancing knowledge through scientific discovery, integration, application, and teaching, which lead toward a holistic understanding of our environmental and natural resources. The Cooperator is a public research university, sharing research, educational, and technological strengths with other institutions. Through inter-institutional collaboration, combined with the unique contributions of each constituent institution, the Cooperator strives to contribute substantially to the cultural, economic, environmental, scientific, social and technological advancement of the nation. The NPS expects there to be substantial involvement between itself and the Cooperator in carrying out the activities contemplated in this Agreement. The primary purpose of this study is not the acquisition of property or services for the direct benefit or use by the Federal Government, but rather to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized the Legislative Authorities in ARTICLE II. This agreement fulfills the Public Purpose of support and economic stimulation for the following reasons:  Projects will engage recipients, partners, communities, and/or visitors in shared environmental stewardship.  Projects will promote greater public and private participation in historic preservation programs and activities. The project builds resource stewardship ethics in its participants.  The information, products and/or services identified or developed by projects will be shared through a variety of strategies to increase public awareness, knowledge and support for historic preservation and stewardship of the nation’s cultural and historical heritage.  Projects will support the Government’s objective to provide opportunities for youth to learn about the environment by spending time working on projects in National Parks. The NPS receives the indirect benefit of completing conservation projects.  Projects will motivate youth participants to become involved in the natural, cultural and /or historical resource protection of their communities and beyond.  Students gain “real world” or hands-on experience outside of the classroom of natural, cultural and/or historical resource projects.  The scientific community and/or researchers external to NPS gains by new knowledge provided through research and related results dissemination of natural, cultural and/or historical resource information.  Projects assist in the creation, promotion, facilitation, and/or improvement of the public’s understanding of natural, cultural, historic, recreational and other aspects of areas such as ecological conservation areas, and state and local parks. For performance under this cooperative agreement, the regulations set forth in 2 CFR, Part 200, supersedes OMB Circulars A–21 (2 CFR 220), A–87 (2 CFR 225), A–110, and A–122 (2 CFR 230); Circulars A–89, A–102, and A–133; and the guidance in Circular A–50 on Single Audit Act follow–up apply. The Cooperator shall adhere to 2 CFR, Part 200 in its entirety in addition to any terms and conditions of the master agreement not superseded by 2 CFR 200, as well as the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. In the event of a conflict between the original terms of the master agreement and 2 CFR, Part 200, relating to this task agreement, 2 CFR, Part 200 shall take precedence.

  • Project Objective A description of the overall purpose and expected outputs and outcomes or results of the Loan Agreement, including significant deliverables and, if appropriate, units of measure.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

  • Goals and Objectives The Parties acknowledge and agree that the specific goals and objectives of the Parties in entering into this Agreement are to:

  • Project Objectives The Program consists of the projects described in Annex I (each a “Project” and collectively, the “Projects”). The objective of each of the Projects (each a “Project Objective” and collectively, the “Project Objectives”) is to:

  • Scope and Objectives 1. This Partnership Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) defines the rights and obligations of the Parties and sets forth the terms and conditions of their cooperation in the implementation of the Project.

  • Goals & Objectives 1. The goal of this Agreement is (INSERT GOAL(S) OF AGREEMENT).

  • Aims and Objectives 1.9.1 The aims and objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Targets and Milestones Comparing the relative performance of different groups to the over or under- representation within the institution and taking into account our current performance in our Access Agreement milestones, areas for particular focus include: Low Participating Neighbourhoods; Low income groups; Target groups to include gender, disability and care leavers; Black and minority ethnic (BME) group attainment; Completion rates. As a result of the analysis of our performances, our access, success and progression interventions will concentrate on the following: Continuation of involvement in collaborative outreach activity via the KMPF and the Kent and Medway Collaborative Network (KMCNet) as part of the National Network for Collaborative Outreach (NNCO); Recognition of the importance of carefully targeted activity; The use of serial rather than one-off interventions; The importance of long-term outreach to include the whole student lifecycle; The helpfulness of Higher Education Access Tracker (HEAT) for evaluating the impact of interventions; The importance of a whole institution approach; The importance of student attendance monitoring; Ease of access to information and student welfare support; An increasing emphasis on evaluation of activities across the student lifecycle; Accessibility of employability advice and support. Given our relatively strong record to date for widening access and student success, most of the targets seek to maintain, and where possible improve, this performance within a more challenging financial environment. Such targets may be especially challenging and stretching in relation to the access of those from Low Participating Neighbourhoods (LPNs), given the demographic decline in the number of young people (aged 18-21) in the population and the University’s already high recruitment levels from these groups. We have removed the University’s NS-SEC target in response to the UK Performance Indicator Steering Group announcement that HESA will no longer be publishing the NS-SEC indicator after 2016. As we already have LPN and Household Income targets in place we shall not be replacing this target with an alternative. We have reviewed our success targets and added new progression targets for 2017. There was a concern in the institution that our internal reporting did not allow for national and regionally adjusted benchmark comparison. We have therefore made the following adjustments to our success targets: Non-continuation two years following year of entry: part-time first degree entrants – all entrants: Replacing the OFFA agreement target with the similar data from HESA allows for national benchmarking to be undertaken in order to ensure that the University is maintaining its commitment to these students. We aim to keep our non-continuation rate in this area below our HESA benchmark rate. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – mature entrants: Changing the target to clearly focus on mature full-time first degree students (to match the national HESA data) ensures that we focus our efforts on this section of the student population and for the outcomes to be compared with HESA benchmarks rather than internally produced data. We aim to ensure that this student population’s non-continuation rate is at or below the HESA benchmark rate by 2020/21. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – all entrants: In order to ensure that young students are not disadvantaged by the focus on mature entrants, the University will also commit to maintaining the overall non-continuation rate for all students at or below the HESA benchmark. BME: the University will replace the current phrasing of the target around BME success with a more explicit aim of reducing the success gap experienced by BME students. Progression: the University has added a progression target that aims to keep us around or above the sector benchmark for the Employment Indicator from the DLHE survey. Combined targets from the collaborative KMPF project (agreed by all partners) are to raise applications and subsequent conversions to higher education from within the target schools and colleges in LPNs. These targets will need to be reviewed in the coming years to reflect changes to GCSE grading in schools. Our institutional and collaborative targets are included in tables 7a and 7b respectively.

  • Agreement Objectives The parties agree that the objectives of the Agreement are to facilitate:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.