Uber Technologies, Inc Sample Clauses

Uber Technologies, Inc. Case No. 1:15-CV-06942 (N.D. Ill.). This case was brought as a class action alleging that Uber violated the TCPA by sending automated text messages without consent to individuals’ cellphones. Uber denies the allegations. The Court has not decided who is right, and the Parties have chosen to settle their dispute. This notice provides only a summary of the allegations. Am I Included? You may be entitled to compensation from this Settlement if you fall within at least one of the following Settlement Classes: A) All persons or entities within the U.S. who, during the Class Period, used or subscribed to a wireless or cellular service and were sent one or more non-emergency text messages, utilizing Twilio Inc.’s system, in connection with Uber’s Refer-a-Friend Program; B) All persons or entities within the U.S. who, during the Class Period, started Uber’s driver application process but did not become an “active” driver in Uber’s system, who used or subscribed to a wireless or cellular service, and to whom Uber sent one or more non-emergency text messages after the user or subscriber requested Uber to discontinue sending text messages; and C) All persons or entities within the U.S. who, during the Class Period, were not party to a contract with Uber and/or who did not provide his or her cellular phone number to Uber, and who used or subscribed to a wireless or cellular service to which Uber sent one or more non-emergency text messages. What Does the Settlement Provide? Uber has agreed to create a fund totaling $20,000,000 to pay valid claims, settlement administration expenses, attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses, and class representative service awards. To receive a payment, you must submit a claim form by Month Day, 2017. Class Members can file a claim online at the website or submit a claim by mail. Visit the website below or call for more information on filing your claim. Uber has also agreed to alter its texting practices as explained in the detailed notice and Settlement Agreement at the website listed below.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Uber Technologies, Inc. Case No. 1:15-CV-06942 (N.D. Ill.)). Uber denies the allegations. The Court has not decided who is right, and the parties have settled their dispute. Why am I being contacted? Our records indicate that you may have received one or more automated text messages and that you may be eligible to receive a payment from the settlement. Who’s Included in the Classes? A) All persons or entities within the U.S. who, during the Class Period, used or subscribed to a wireless or cellular service and were sent one or more non-emergency text messages, utilizing Twilio Inc.’s system, in connection with Uber’s Refer-a-Friend Program;
Uber Technologies, Inc. Case No. 1:15-cv-06942. If you received notice of the Settlement directed to you, then you may be a member of the Settlement Classes. But even if you did not receive a notice, you may still be a member of the Settlement Classes. The “Settlement Classes” are defined as: Settlement Class A: All persons or entities within the U.S. who, from December 31, 2010 up to and including [date], used or subscribed to a wireless or cellular service and were sent one or more non-emergency text messages, utilizing Twilio Inc.’s system, in connection with Uber’s Refer-a-Friend Program. Settlement Class B: All persons or entities within the U.S. who, from December 31, 2010 up to and including [date], started Uber’s driver application process but did not become an “active” driver in Uber’s system, who used or subscribed to a wireless or cellular service, and to whom Uber sent one or more non-emergency text messages after the user or subscriber requested Uber to discontinue sending text messages. Settlement Class C: All persons or entities within the U.S. who, from December 31, 2010 up to and including [date], were not party to a contract with Uber and/or who did not provide his or her cellular phone number to Uber, and who used or subscribed to a wireless or cellular service to which Uber sent one or more non-emergency text messages. Excluded from the Settlement Classes are all persons who elect to exclude themselves from the Settlement Classes, the Court and staff to whom this case is assigned, and any member of the Court’s or staff’s immediate family. If you are not sure whether you are in the Settlement Classes, or have any other questions about the Settlement, visit the Settlement website at www.[insert].com or call the toll free number [insert].
Uber Technologies, Inc. Supreme Court Case No. S274671 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Esq. XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, P.C. 000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Floor 34 San Francisco, CA 94104-2842 xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx Counsel for Defendant and Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Esq. XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, P.C. 000 0xx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0 Xxx Xxxx, XX 00000-0000 xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx Counsel for Defendant and Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. Xxxxxxx Xx, Esq. XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, P.C. 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxx 0xx Xxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000 xxx@xxxxxxx.xxx Counsel for Defendant and Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Esq. Xxxxx X. Xx Xxxxxx, Esq. XXXXX LAW FIRM P.C. 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxx, XX 00000 xxxxxxx@xxxxx-xxx.xxx xxxxxxxx@xxxxx-xxx.xxx Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxx, Esq. Mengfei Sun, Esq. XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX & HO 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxxxx, XX 00000 xxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx xxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent Xxxx Xxxxxx
Uber Technologies, Inc. 1:15-CV-06972 (N.D. Ill.).  A comprehensive notice program within the Volkswagen Emissions Litigation that provided individual notice to more than 946,000 vehicle owners via first class mail and to more than 855,000 vehicle owners via email. A targeted internet campaign further enhanced the notice effort. In re: Volkswagen “Clean Diesel” Marketing, Sales Practices and Product Liability Litigation (Bosch Settlement), MDL No. 2672 (N.D. Cal.).
Uber Technologies, Inc. No. 1:14-cv-14750-DPW), the Settlement Class Member’s name, address, mobile phone number associated with the Settlement Class Member’s Uber Account, and email address associated with the Settlement Class Member’s Uber Account, and be personally signed, or if via website, electronically signed, by the Settlement Class Member who seeks to opt out. No opt-out request may be made on behalf of a group of Settlement Class Members. The opt-out request must be sent via the website or by mail to the Settlement Administrator and must be timely submitted via the website or postmarked as set forth above. The website submission record or postmark date of the mailing envelope shall be the exclusive means used to determine whether an opt-out has been timely submitted. Any Settlement Class Member who requests exclusion from (i.e., opts out of) the Settlement will not be entitled to any Settlement Award and will not be bound by the Settlement Agreement or have any right to object, appeal or comment thereon. Not later than fourteen (14) days before the date of the Final Approval Hearing, the Settlement Administrator shall file with the Court a document: (i) containing a list of those persons who have opted out or excluded themselves from the Settlement; and (ii) stating the total number of Class Members.
Uber Technologies, Inc. No. 1:14-cv-14750-DPW); and (e) their hard-copy or electronic signature. Any request for exclusion or opt out must be dated or postmarked on or before forty-five (45) days from the issuance of this Preliminary Approval Order. The date of the postmark on envelope containing the opt-out request, or the date of the email or the date affixed by the Class Member to the website form shall be the exclusive means used to determine whether a request for exclusion has been timely submitted. The Settlement Administrator shall forward copies of any written requests for exclusion to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel. The Settlement Administrator shall file a list reflecting all timely requests for exclusion with the Court no later than fourteen (14) days before the Final Approval Hearing. If the proposed Settlement is finally approved, any potential Class Member who has not submitted a timely written request for exclusion from the Class on or before the Opt- Out Deadline, shall be bound by all terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Final Order and Final Judgment, even if the potential Class Member previously initiated or subsequently initiates any litigation against any or all of the Released Parties relating to Released Claims. All persons or entities who properly exclude themselves from the Class shall not be Class Members and shall relinquish their rights or benefits under the Settlement Agreement, should it be approved, and may not file an objection to the Settlement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Uber Technologies, Inc whose registered office is at 0000 0xx Xx., Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 00000 (“Uber”);

Related to Uber Technologies, Inc

  • New Technology When new or updated technology is introduced into a workplace, it will be the responsibility of the employer to provide appropriate and, if necessary, ongoing training to the employees directly affected. Such training will include any health and safety implications or information that will enable employees to operate the equipment without discomfort and will help maintain their general well-being.

  • Technology Discoveries, innovations, Know-How and inventions, whether patentable or not, including computer software, recognized under U.S. law as intellectual creations to which rights of ownership accrue, including, but not limited to, patents, trade secrets, maskworks and copyrights developed under this Agreement.

  • Background Technology List here prior contracts to assign Inventions that are now in existence between any other person or entity and you. [ ] List here previous Inventions which you desire to have specifically excluded from the operation of this Agreement. Continue on reverse side if necessary.

  • Joint Technology The Parties agree that, in order to effectuate the provisions of Section 4.4.2, subject to any exclusive licenses granted hereunder, (a) the non-use provisions of this Article 9 shall not apply to each Party’s use of Joint Technology, and (b) each Party may disclose the Joint Technology to Third Parties who are under terms of confidentiality no less strict than those contained in this Agreement.

  • Innovations As used in this Agreement, the term “Innovations” means all processes, machines, manufactures, compositions of matter, improvements, inventions (whether or not protectable under patent laws), works of authorship, information fixed in any tangible medium of expression (whether or not protectable under copyright laws), moral rights, mask works, trademarks, trade names, trade dress, trade secrets, know-how, ideas (whether or not protectable under trade secret laws), and all other subject matter protectable under patent, copyright, moral right, mask work, trademark, trade secret or other laws, and includes without limitation all new or useful art, combinations, discoveries, formulae, manufacturing techniques, technical developments, discoveries, artwork, software, and designs. “Innovations” includes “Inventions,” which is defined to mean any inventions protected under patent laws.

  • Technology License 4.1 Unless any event described in Article 2.2 or 2.3 of this Agreement occurs, all of the technology required to be licensed for any of Party B’s business shall be provided by Party A on an exclusive basis. Party A will try its best to license Party B to use the technology owned by Party A, or re-license Party B to use the technology as approved by the owner.

  • Information Technology The following applies to all contracts for information technology commodities and contractual services. “Information technology” is defined in section 287.012(15), F.S., to have the same meaning as provided in section 282.0041, F.S.

  • PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT EXCLUSIVE PHS and Licensee agree as follows:

  • Manufacturing Technology Transfer With respect to each Technology Transfer Product, upon AbbVie’s written request after the Inclusion Date for the Included Target to which such Technology Transfer Product is Directed, Morphic shall effect a full transfer to AbbVie or its designee (which designee may be an Affiliate or a Third Party manufacturer) of all Morphic Know-How and Joint Know-How relating to the then-current process for the Manufacture of such Technology Transfer Product (the “Manufacturing Process”) and to implement the Manufacturing Process at facilities designated by AbbVie (such transfer and implementation, as more fully described in this Section 5.3, the “Manufacturing Technology Transfer”). To assist with the Manufacturing Technology Transfer, Morphic will make its personnel reasonably available to AbbVie during normal business hours for up to [***] FTE hours with respect to each Included Target (in each case, free of charge to AbbVie) to transfer and implement the Manufacturing Process under this Section 5.3. Thereafter, if requested by AbbVie, Morphic shall continue to perform such obligations; provided, that AbbVie will reimburse Morphic for its full-time equivalent (FTE) costs (for clarity, in excess of [***] FTE hours) and any reasonable and verifiable out-of-pocket costs incurred in providing such assistance. CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.