Transparent and Accountable Governance Project Sample Clauses

Transparent and Accountable Governance Project. The objective of the Transparent and Accountable Governance Project is to improve the public availability and analytical use of judicial, environmental, and labor force data by civil society, business, and the Government, thus promoting data driven decision-making. The proposed Activities under this Project include:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Transparent and Accountable Governance Project. The fact that civil society and non-governmental organizations (“NGOs”) cannot engage constructively with the Government due to lack of publically available data and adequate outreach is the identified problem. This leads to a perception of poor government performance, at least part of which is based on reality, and undermines investor confidence. The objective of the Transparent and Accountable Governance Project is to improve the public availability and analytical use of judicial, environmental, and labor force data by civil society, business, and the Government, thus promoting data driven decision-making. This may logically address the inability of civil society to constructively engage with the Government. As a first step, public perception must align with the reality of public performance. The creation of a public judicial portal will support improved quality and readiness of judicial decisions for publication on the internet, and allow judicial accountability to the public. Regularly produced, machine-readable environmental data on the internet as well as the KODC Activity will make data available to the civil society and NGOs. This will support critical analyses and use of key judicial, environmental, and labor force statistics by the public. There may be an opportunity for Government officials to use these analyses in policy related decision- making. With additional support to the communication capabilities of select ministries and agencies to conduct outreach with civil society, as well as each other, greater trust and collaboration is expected to be fostered between civil society and Government stakeholders to produce creative solutions to respond to Government needs. This should contribute to an improvement in the perception of Government function and improved investor confidence. This theory of change is contingent upon the scale and adoption of the data transparency culture, and therefore the higher order outcomes may be modest. Project Logic Diagram: Transparent and Accountable Governance Project Risks and Assumptions The M&E Plan will also outline key assumptions and risks that underlie the accomplishment of the theory of change summarized in the program logic. However, such assumptions and risks will not excuse any party’s performance unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing by the other party. The known assumptions and risks include: Reliable Energy Landscape Project: PIE Activity Risks Risk Category Risk Description Probability Imp...
Sample 1

Related to Transparent and Accountable Governance Project

  • Project Governance (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will:

  • Contract Governance Any contract made or entered into by the TIPS is subject to and is to be governed by Section 271.151 et seq, Tex Lo Code. Otherwise, TIPS does not waive its governmental immunities from suit or liability except to the extent expressly by other applicable laws in clear and unambiguous language. Yes, I Agree (Yes) 9

  • Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.

  • GOVERNANCE AND REPORTING Measure 3a Is the school complying with governance requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to governance by its board, including but not limited to: • Governing board composition and membership requirements pursuant to Ch. 302D, HRS • Governing board policies • Governing board reporting requirements • Procurement policies • State Ethics Code (Ch. 84, HRS), including conflict of interest policy Measure 3b Is the school holding management accountable? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to oversight of school management, including but not limited to: • (For Education Service Providers [ESPs]) maintaining authority over management, holding it accountable for performance as agreed under a written performance agreement and requiring annual financial reports of the ESP • (For Others) oversight of management that includes holding it accountable for performance expectations that may or may not be agreed to under a written performance agreement Measure 3c Is the school complying with data and reporting requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to relevant reporting requirements to the State Public Charter School Commission, State Department of Education as the State Education Agency (SEA) and sole Local Education Agency (LEA) and/or federal authorities, including but not limited to: • Compliance with minimum educational data reporting standards established by the BOE • Maintaining and reporting accurate enrollment and attendance data • Maintaining and reporting accurate personnel data • Annual reporting and immediate notice requirements • Additional information requested by the State Public Charter School Commission

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Fair and Equitable Treatment and Full Protection and Security 1. Each Party shall accord fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security in accordance with customary international law in its territory to investment of investors of the other Party. 2. For greater certainty, (a) the concepts of "fair and equitable treatment" and "full protection and security" do not require additional treatment to that required under the minimum standard of treatment of aliens in accordance with the standard of customary international law; (b) a determination that there has been a breach of another provision of this Agreement or another international agreement does not imply that the minimum standard of treatment of aliens has been breached; (c) "fair and equitable treatment" includes the prohibition against denial of justice in criminal, civil, or administrative proceedings in accordance with the general accepted principles of customary international law; and (d) the "full protection and security" standard does not imply, in any case, a better treatment to that accorded to nationals of the Party where the investment has been made.

  • Corporate Governance Ultimus shall provide the following services to the Trust and its Funds:

  • General Responsibilities of the Parties 1. The Parties will work together in a spirit of cooperation and partnership, with the responsibilities and accountabilities set out in this Agreement, to implement the Programme Documents in full in a timely, efficient, and effective, manner.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB) AUDIT REQUIREMENTS The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in 2 CFR 200.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.