Shared Governance. The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.
Shared Governance. 1. The Employer and the DTU agree that the improvement of students' learning is of primary importance. In order to maximize the potential for effective curriculum, instruction, and other learning-related functions, and in order to maximize effectiveness of employees, the Employer and DTU jointly support the process of Shared Governance and the employee's right to participate in this process. We agree that it is the best system yet devised to insure justice and fairness, stability, direction, cooperation, collaboration, and commitment in our schools/work locations. This Shared Governance process is strongly encouraged at all work locations, including Administrative sites. In addition, district wide resource employees may have district Shared Governance Committees.
Shared Governance. 2.1 The UFE and the College recognize the College’s history of shared governance through which the faculty historically has provided recommendations to the Board of Trustees, through the Xxxxxxx and President, on matters of academic policy. The parties support the principle of shared governance and the College’s faculty governance structures, including the Faculty Agenda Committee and the Faculty Meeting, as found in the Faculty Handbook. They also recognize that in light of the UFE’s role as the exclusive bargaining representative for the faculty, the role historically played by the College’s governance structures will change.
Shared Governance. Nothing in this Agreement will infringe upon the shared governance provisions provided in Board policy and delegated to the Faculty Senates organized on each campus.
Shared Governance. The Parties recognize the authority of the Association as the exclusive bargaining agent for members of the bargaining unit on matters of wages, hours, fringe benefits, and other conditions of employment (00-00-000, MCA). The Parties also recognize the prerogative of the Employer to establish and/or support faculty participation in shared governance efforts including, but not limited to, the organization of the Faculty Senate. Matters that shall be reviewed and recommended by the Senate, in accordance with regulations of the Board, shall include:
Shared Governance. The parties recognize the importance of the statement of shared governance as developed by the YSU Excellence Steering Committee and endorsed by the Academic Senate, “Principles and Practice of Shared Governance” (November 1, 2017), and adopted by the YSU Board of Trustees on December 7, 2017. However, both parties agree that Article 1.2 shall not be subject to the grievance procedure.
Shared Governance. (a) It is recognized that the faculty can provide valuable contributions to all levels of the College administration. It is also recognized that faculty are uniquely qualified to participate in the governance of the College with respect to academic matters.
Shared Governance. Since employees serving as Executive Officers of the CEU are required to participate in certain shared governance activities, such activities shall be considered as part of the employee’s assigned weekly hours. Timely completion of the employee’s regular duties shall be a priority, as discussed with and approved by their supervisor.
Shared Governance. The law xxxx and faculty shall each have a significant role in planning, implementing, and administering the program of legal education of the law school, including curriculum, subject matter and methods of instruction/evaluation, admissions policies/procedures, academic standards, and those aspects of the student experience that relate to the educational process. The CSU Board of Trustees/Administration and AAUP-LS recognize the necessity of faculty participation in the making of academic and educational policies not subject to collective bargaining. The CSU Board of Trustees/Administration and AAUP-LS recognize and affirm 1) the law faculty as the appropriate instrumentality for faculty participation in the governance of the Law School and fully support an independent and effective law faculty, and 2) the Faculty Senate as the appropriate instrumentality for faculty participation in the governance of the University and fully support an independent and effective Faculty Senate. The role and responsibilities of the law faculty and its standing committees are described in the Bylaws of the Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxx College of Law. The role and responsibilities of the CSU Faculty Senate and its standing committees are described in the Bylaws of the Faculty Senate, which are available in the Faculty Personnel Policies at the Office of Compliance website: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/compliance/faculty-personnel-policies
Shared Governance. CSEA’s participation in committees established pursuant to AB1725 (shared governance) shall not be construed as a waiver of CSEA’s collective bargaining rights when agenda items relate to issues within the scope of bargaining as determined by Section 3543.2 (a) of the Government Code of the State of California.
