Policy Detail. 2.1 The Learning Agreement for any particular student is drawn up by the Head of Subject or nominee as required, following discussion within the course team. The Learning Agreement should contain a set of conditions which are binding and which must be adhered to by the student without exception. The Learning Agreement details the behaviours required of the student and any supportive measures being put in place (for example meetings with Student Support Services, Senior Tutors, study skills sessions).
Policy Detail. 2.1 The SAB is only able to consider complaints which relate to actions that have been or should have been taken by the SAB in fulfilling it’s responsibilities as set out in the SAB Partnership Agreement.
Policy Detail. 3.1 A senior member of QMUL staff must take personal responsibility for maintaining confidentiality of information provided to third parties.
Policy Detail. WPL Teams Eligible to Be Challenged As above, the bottom two WPL teams can be challenged for their spots. As per the standing following all games played as of after Week 9 in the regular season, the bottom two seeded WPL teams seeds from each conference will be asked to sign their intent to meet a challenge. Specifically, if they finish 9th or 10th in the WPL and are challenged, whether they will commit to play in a challenge match at a specified location and specified date within 2-4 weeks of Nationals. If a WPL team that finishes 9th or 10th does not play in the designated challenge match, it is a forfeit and that team will play in the D1 league the following year. The D1 team scheduled to play that team wins the challenge match by xxxxxxx and moves into the WPL the following year. The required document is the WPL Promotion/Relegation Policy Participation Agreement and the deadline for receipt by the WPL Commissioner the Monday prior to WPL Championships. If any of the lower four teams in the WPL fail to submit the required signed document by the deadline, the team will forfeit their chance to accept the challenge from the D1 teams and relinquish the team’s spot in the WPL, should a challenge occur. Assuming that both of the top D1 teams want the opportunity to play in the WPL, the top D1 team would play a challenge match against the #10 WPL team. Similarly, the #2 D1 team would play a challenge match against the #9 WPL team. Between the winners of the challenge matches, the higher ranked team would become the #9 WPL team. (The teams are ranked WPL #9, WPL #10, D1 #1 and D1 #2 from highest to lowest.) If the top D1 team did not want to challenge or could not meet the WPL requirements, the #2 D1 team would challenge the #10 WPL team and the #9 WPL team would not be challenged. Policy Detail: Challenge Match Challenge matches would take place at the same site on the same day in a warm climate within 2-4 weeks of WPL Championships. The WPL or USA Rugby will be responsible for identifying the city and date of the challenge matches during the fall season, so it is known before Nationals. Holding the challenge match within 4 weeks of WPL Championships offers the best combination of: the WPL team maintaining play at a high level for the challenge match, after peaking throughout the fall for Nationals; the DI team given an adequate amount of time to prepare for the challenge over the course of the Fall while still being able to play an additional competitive DI ...
Policy Detail. 2.1 The SCB is only able to consider complaints which fall into two categories:-
Policy Detail. All uses of information technology resources must comply with GLO policies, standards, procedures, and guidelines, as well as any applicable federal or state laws. Appropriate Use GLO’s information technology resources are to be used for business purposes in serving the interests of the Texas GLO. The GLO’s computing services and facilities may not be used for political purposes. The GLO’s computing services and facilities may not be used for personal economic gain. Users are prohibited from using personal email accounts for state business. Users must not engage in unlawful or malicious activities. Users must not deliberately propagate any virus, worm, Trojan horse, trap-door program code, or other code or file designed to disrupt, disable, impair, or otherwise harm either the GLO’s networks or systems or those of any other individual or entity.
Policy Detail. User Access Vendor representatives may be subject to background checks and may undergo training or orientation conducted by the GLO’s Human Resources Department. If necessary, Vendor representatives may be granted remote access to GLO information resources. Virtual Private Network (VPN) access may be granted if no other remote access strategy meets the project requirements. Vendor representatives connecting to GLO information resources must do so from a secured location and may not connect over a publicly available connection, such as public wi-fi. Remote access to GLO information resources may only be conducted using a computer that has up to date anti-virus software, operating system, and 3rd party applications. The Vendor bears responsibility for any intrusion, breach, or attack on GLO information resources that is caused by the Vendor’s representatives, regardless of intent. This includes but is not limited to the costs of notification, remediation, fines, and similar costs. User accounts and/or passwords should not be shared under any circumstances. Vendors that share account credentials are subject to potential penalties up to and including termination of the contract. User account passwords will adhere to password complexity and reset requirements as determined by the GLO. Vendors are required to notify the GLO immediately of any changes to staff that impact GLO projects or access to GLO systems.
Policy Detail. Any breach of a GEH tenancy agreement condition or part of the Residential Tenancies Act 1999 can result in termination of the tenancy. However, CEO (Housing) treats some breaches as less serious and will only seek termination for a breach where the tenant has seriously or repeatedly breached the terms of the tenancy agreement. Breaches such as the use of illegal drugs on the premises or extensive damage to the premises are considered serious and are more likely to result in immediate termination. Some serious breaches will be taken directly to the police or to the local courts, which can halt CEO (Housing)’s termination process until the matter is finalised by the authorities. Under the Residential Tenancies Act 1999, CEO (Housing) may give the tenant a notice of intention to terminate the tenancy for a breach. This is in addition to any warning letters or notifications which are communicated with the tenant. For a notice to be withdrawn, both CEO (Housing) and the tenant must sign a document stating that the notice has been withdrawn.
Policy Detail. 2.1 OSCP is only able to consider complaints which fall into one of two categories:
Policy Detail. It is the Department’s preference that any breach of a tenancy agreement be remedied so that the tenancy can continue. Any breach of a tenancy agreement condition or part of the Residential Tenancies Act 1999 can result in termination of the tenancy. However, the Department treats some breaches as less serious and will only seek termination for a breach where the tenant has seriously or repeatedly breached the terms of the tenancy agreement. Breaches such as the use of illegal drugs on the premises or extensive damage to the premises are considered serious and are more likely to result in immediate termination. Some serious breaches will be taken directly to the police or to the local courts, which can halt the Department’s termination process until the matter is finalised by the authorities. Under the Residential Tenancies Act 1999, the Department may give the tenant a notice of intention to terminate the tenancy for a breach. This is in addition to any warning letters or notifications which are communicated with the tenant. For a notice to be withdrawn, both the Department and the tenant must sign a document stating that the notice has been withdrawn.
