Objective Evidence Sample Clauses

Objective Evidence. Employees must act in good faith and must have a reasonable belief, supported by objective evidence that an abnormally hazardous condition exists.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Objective Evidence. Check (  )verified evidence and/or take notes -Quality Policy -Quality Objectives -Internal Audit summaries with effective follow-up and trend analysis. -Process monitoring devices: i.e. C.P.K. analysis improvement matrix, Scrap monitoring and improvement team results; audits. -Systemic continuous improvement projects related to strategic company business indicators. Note 1: Where the tem “documented procedure” appears within this International Standard, this requires the procedure to be established, documented, implemented and maintained. Note 2: The documented procedures and documents may be in any form or type of medium.
Objective Evidence. Check ( )verified evidence and/or take notes (reference section 4 quality management system)
Objective Evidence. Check ( )verified evidence and/or take notes -Management review must cover: Evaluation of internal/external audit Evaluation of customer satisfaction/dissatisfaction (complaints, reports) C.P.K. analysis, scrap reporting, audit/containment results…etc. Relevance and status of corrective/preventive actions in relationship to quality policy. Review record of last management review for the following: - action plans for negative trends - relationship between policy and objectives with results. - quality cost considerations vs. containment/process control need - organizational performance in regards to bottle necks and work performance.(personnel considerations)
Objective Evidence. Check ( )verified evidence and/or take notes -Appropriate lighting for cosmetic control -Appropriate purification/maintenance of operating environment and critical equipment affecting part quality. -Clean work environment -Housekeeping implementation and improvement - Appropriate temperature, humidity, static control, vibration that may effect part quality. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 7. Product realization 7.1 Planning of realization processes [ ] NO NONCONFORMANCES FOUND [ ] _____ NONCONFORMANCES FOUND
Objective Evidence. Check ( )verified evidence and/or take notes -Approved supplier list or other record -S.P.C./Process monitoring charts, material certifications, audit results and anything that would show supplier’s conformance to organization’s requirements. -Supplier performance to organization’s criteria monitored and reported -Supplier audit/ evaluation results leading to approved supplier’s -Review of supplier performance leading to approved supplier’s -Appropriate corrective actions with supplier’s who do not meet organization’s requirements.
Objective Evidence. Check ( )verified evidence and/or take notes -Can the work instructions/product characteristics be easily understood and are they available at point of use. -Are machines in proper condition and appropriately maintained -Are areas and isles clearly marked, is the manufacturing area appropriate for orderly material flow? -Statistically sound sampling plans at appropriate stages of the process -Verify procedure vs. actual practice: (release, delivery and post-delivery activities)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Objective Evidence. Check ( )verified evidence and/or take notes -List of equipment to be calibrated=all inspection devices on quality plans=any device measuring something that can affect product/service quality? verify safeguards of measuring and monitoring devices - gage maintenance work instruction included in calibration procedures, gage sign-out sheets…etc. -Are software programs verified with known rejects…etc. See 5.5.7 Note: See ISO 10012 for guidance. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 8. Measurement, analysis and improvement 8.1 Planning [ ] NO NONCONFORMANCES FOUND [ ] _____ NONCONFORMANCES FOUND
Objective Evidence. Check ( )verified evidence and/or take notes Procedure for control of nonconformity that addresses, identification and control to prevent unintended use or delivery vs. actual practice -Evidence that reworked or reconditioned product had gone through quality plan inspection prior to shipment -Review contract requirements regarding reworked product -Notification of customer when product had deviated from specifications -Notifying customer of low C.P.K. values and customer approved reaction plans QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 8.4 Analysis of data [ ] NO NONCONFORMANCES FOUND [ ] _____ NONCONFORMANCES FOUND The organization shall collect data from relevant sources, including internal audits, corrective and preventative action, nonconforming product and/or service, customer complaints and customer satisfaction results. The organization shall analyze applicable data to provide information on: Customer satisfaction and / or dissatisfaction; conformance to customer requirements; characteristics of processes, product and their trends; suppliers. OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE: Check( ) verified evidence and/or take notes - M.O.S \ Q. O.S. type activities - actual vs goals QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 8. Measurement, analysis and improvement 8.5 Improvement [ ] NO NONCONFORMANCES FOUND [ ] _____ NONCONFORMANCES FOUND

Related to Objective Evidence

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx 8 Choice of Law clauses with TIPS Members If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect. 9

  • Specific Objectives In accordance with Articles 34 and 35 of the Cotonou Agreement, the specific objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • Acceptance Criteria 6.7.2.1. During the test there shall be no evidence of:

  • Objective and Scope 1. The Parties shall aim at the liberalisation of current payments and capital movements between them, in conformity with the commitments undertaken in the framework of the international financial institutions and with due consideration to each Party's currency stability.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Origin Criteria For the goods that meet the origin criteria, the exporter should indicate in Box 8 of this Form, the origin criteria met, in the manner shown in the following table: Circumstances of production or manufacture in the country named in Box 11 of this form: Insert in Box 8

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The partnership proposed by the Cooperator was selected due to merit review evaluations from the 2017 Notice of Funding Opportunity P17AS00037. The Cooperator demonstrated expertise in disciplines and subject areas of relevance to cooperative research and training. The Cooperator met the program interests of NPS with expertise, facilities, experience, diversity of programs, and history of collaborative research projects. The Cooperator helps the NPS-CESU to meet its objectives to:  Provide research, technical assistance and education to NPS for land management, and research;  Develop a program of research, technical assistance and education that involves the biological, physical, social, and cultural sciences needed to address resources issues and interdisciplinary problem-solving at multiple scales and in an ecosystem context at the local, regional, and national level; and  Place special emphasis on the working collaboration among NPS, universities, and their related partner institutions. Title: Provide research, technical assistance and education for resource management and research The CESU network seeks to provide scientifically-based information on the nature and status of selected biological, physical, and cultural resources occurring within the parks in a form that increases its utility for making management decisions, conducting scientific research, educating the public, developing effective monitoring programs, and developing management strategies for resource protection. Studying the resources present in NPS parks benefits the Cooperator’s goal of advancing knowledge through scientific discovery, integration, application, and teaching, which lead toward a holistic understanding of our environmental and natural resources. The Cooperator is a public research university, sharing research, educational, and technological strengths with other institutions. Through inter-institutional collaboration, combined with the unique contributions of each constituent institution, the Cooperator strives to contribute substantially to the cultural, economic, environmental, scientific, social and technological advancement of the nation. The NPS expects there to be substantial involvement between itself and the Cooperator in carrying out the activities contemplated in this Agreement. The primary purpose of this study is not the acquisition of property or services for the direct benefit or use by the Federal Government, but rather to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized the Legislative Authorities in ARTICLE II. This agreement fulfills the Public Purpose of support and economic stimulation for the following reasons:  Projects will engage recipients, partners, communities, and/or visitors in shared environmental stewardship.  Projects will promote greater public and private participation in historic preservation programs and activities. The project builds resource stewardship ethics in its participants.  The information, products and/or services identified or developed by projects will be shared through a variety of strategies to increase public awareness, knowledge and support for historic preservation and stewardship of the nation’s cultural and historical heritage.  Projects will support the Government’s objective to provide opportunities for youth to learn about the environment by spending time working on projects in National Parks. The NPS receives the indirect benefit of completing conservation projects.  Projects will motivate youth participants to become involved in the natural, cultural and /or historical resource protection of their communities and beyond.  Students gain “real world” or hands-on experience outside of the classroom of natural, cultural and/or historical resource projects.  The scientific community and/or researchers external to NPS gains by new knowledge provided through research and related results dissemination of natural, cultural and/or historical resource information.  Projects assist in the creation, promotion, facilitation, and/or improvement of the public’s understanding of natural, cultural, historic, recreational and other aspects of areas such as ecological conservation areas, and state and local parks. For performance under this cooperative agreement, the regulations set forth in 2 CFR, Part 200, supersedes OMB Circulars A–21 (2 CFR 220), A–87 (2 CFR 225), A–110, and A–122 (2 CFR 230); Circulars A–89, A–102, and A–133; and the guidance in Circular A–50 on Single Audit Act follow–up apply. The Cooperator shall adhere to 2 CFR, Part 200 in its entirety in addition to any terms and conditions of the master agreement not superseded by 2 CFR 200, as well as the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. In the event of a conflict between the original terms of the master agreement and 2 CFR, Part 200, relating to this task agreement, 2 CFR, Part 200 shall take precedence.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!