Analysis of Data Sample Clauses

Analysis of Data. At the end of the year we had 10 students at year 9 and 10 students at year 10, that are missing from the end of year data. We conducted these tests during the Junior exam week. I contacted the parents of the students that were absent, though some had legitimate reasons, such as xxxxx’s and illness, there were many parents who thought that the juniors had finished when the Senior students had finished at the end of week 4 of Term 4. This has led me to re-evaluate when testing should be done. Though it is convenient to hold testing once the seniors have left, we continue to miss out on a number of students. Therefore, in 2017 we will be completing the testing within the first two weeks of term 4. For this report comparisons between beginning and end of year date will be made using percentages. Overall, the writing data had shown that a number of students at both Year Nine and Year Ten sat below the recommended curriculum level. At the start of the year, 73% of the year 9 cohort sat below 3A, the average, while 27% of the cohort sat at or above 3A. By the end of the year we can see a marked improvement with 42% of the year 9 cohort sat below 3A, while 58% sat at or above 3A. This is a significant improvement. This 42% equated to 40 students. Of those 40 students, 10 decreased in the level of their writing, 4 did not shift, 17 improved and 11 students that had not been previously tested. Of the upper 58%, which was 55 students; none had decreased in the level of their reading, 5 did not move, 46 improved, and there were 4 students that had not previously been tested. At the start of the year, 74% of the year 10 cohort sat below 4P, the average, while 26% of the cohort sat at or above 4P. By the end of the year we can see a marked improvement with 51% of the year 10 cohort sat below 4P, while 49% sat at or above 4P. This is a significant improvement with 23% of the cohort moving from below to at or above 4P. This 51% equated to 50 students. Of those 50 students, 16 decreased in the level of their writing, 5 did not shift, 25 improved and 4 students that had not been previously tested. Of the upper 49%, which was 49 students; 7 had decreased in the level of their reading, 5 did not move, 35 improved, and there were 2 students that had not previously been tested. These e-asTTle writing tests, are vital as we can see the areas that students need to specifically work on in relation to ideas, structure and language, organisation, vocabulary, sentence structure, pun...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Analysis of Data. Within eighteen months of the effective date of this Agreement and every six months thereafter until the end of five years, the FBI will analyze the employment data maintained in accordance with this Agreement to determine whether the employment practices or personnel systems at issue have had an adverse impact upon any group of employees during the previous data gathering period as well as cumulatively from the date this Agreement was entered.
Analysis of Data. There are pleasing results in the baseline data for the Year 9 2017 cohort. The results show that 80% of all students are sitting at or above level 4 of the NZC for reading. This shows an increasing trend over the years with the percentage of students sitting at or above level 4. In the cohort in 2016 at the start of the year 50% of students were sitting at or above level 4 of the NZC. This is a significant improvement on previous cohorts. Year 9 End Of Year Data - < 2B 2B 2P 2A 3B 3P 3A 4B 4P 4A 5B 5P 5A Pasifika 1 1 Year 10 Results: Baseline Data - > 2B 2B 2P 2A 3B 3P 3A 4B 4P 4A 5B 5P 5A 6B Total 7 1 6 17 26 32 16 3 1 Pasifika 1 1 1 2 2
Analysis of Data. There are pleasing results in the baseline data for the year 10 2017 cohort. The results show that 92% of all students are sitting at or above level 4 of the NZC for reading. This shows an increasing trend from the end of year testing for this cohort. At the end of year 9 this cohort tested with only 72% of students at or above level 4 of the NZC. At year 10 it desirable that the cohort would be sitting at level 5 of the NZC in preparation for level 1 NCEA. We currently have 19% of the cohort in this position. We are working on gathering portfolio evidence for the (Literacy) Unit Standards: writing, reading, and active participation in discussion. END OF YEAR YEAR 10 E-ASTTLE READING - > 2B 2B 2P 2A 3B 3P 3A 4B 4P 4A 5B 5P 5A 6B Māori 3 2 4 6 9 32 11 1 4
Analysis of Data. The cohort was tested at writing average of 3P. This is below where we would expect year 10 cohorts to test, which is 4A. We currently have 47% of the year 10 2017 cohort sitting at 3P or above and 9% sitting at 4A or above. To address issues around writing every junior unit within the English programme has a written component. Part of the entry procedures into classes also involves a “Do Now”, which is based around sustained silent writing for 5-10 minutes. In addition, with the help of the in school COL writing coordinator to ensure that writing is a focus across the curriculum. At Year 10 we have a focus on Literacy Unit Standards to aid student achievement.
Analysis of Data. The revenue data received from cable operator will be used to summarize all revenues earned within the boundaries of the municipality. The revenue summary will document the portion of revenues, which each cable operator has included in the franchise fee remittances. In addition, we will conduct a search for revenues that may have been excluded from recognition. The specific revenue or contra-expense accounts which have been excluded from the compilation of the revenue base will be analyzed to determine if such amounts are properly excluded under the definition of the revenue base found in the Member’s respective franchise agreements and/or ordinances. Any computational errors or revenue definition differences will be clearly indicated in our report. TASK IV - REPORT PREPARATION Xxxx & Banks, upon completion of the on-site work and financial analysis, will summarize all findings and prepare a draft copy of the reports for review by a designated official of the Member. All items will be reviewed and discussed before the report is finalized. T&B will provide copies of the finalized report to the appropriate designated Government Official(s). TASK V - ASSIST MUNICIPALITIES IN NEGOTIATING FINANCIAL SETTLEMENT Acting in the capacity as your Representative we will explain and support the review findings and conclusions during negotiation sessions with the cable television operator.
Analysis of Data. All interviews (where permission is given) shall be recorded and detailed notes shall be compiled. Data shall be analysed using the computer-aided qualitative analysis software (MAXqda) which assists researchers in undertaking systematic coding of large amounts of data and enhances quality assurance procedures. This shall enable the Contractor to draw together schools’ approaches and perceptions of impact, providing a detailed sense of how these are perceived to relate to one another.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Analysis of Data

  • Sources of Data A full description of documentation and other information, if applicable, relied upon by the IRO in performing the Transactions Review.

  • Loss of Data In the event of loss of any State data or records where such loss is due to the intentional act, omission, or negligence of the Contractor or any of its subcontractors or agents, the Contractor shall be responsible for recreating such lost data in the manner and on the schedule set by the Contract Manager. The Contractor shall ensure that all data is backed up and is recoverable by the Contractor.

  • Basis of compilation This statement of eligible expenditure has been prepared to meet the requirements of the grant agreement between [enter Grantee name] and the Commonwealth represented by the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. Significant accounting policies applied in the compilation of the statement of grant income and expenditure include the following: [enter details] Certification by directors [if not director, replace with appropriate equivalent] [Grantee name] [Project number] For the period [dd/ mm/yyyy] to [dd/ mm/yyyy] We confirm that, to the best of our knowledge and believe, having made such enquiries as we considered necessary for the purpose of appropriately informing ourselves: Statement of grant income and expenditure We have fulfilled our responsibilities for the preparation of the statement of grant income and expenditure in accordance with the cash basis of accounting and the terms of the grant agreement with the Commonwealth, represented by the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources dated [enter date]; in particular, the statement of grant income and expenditure presents fairly in accordance therewith. All events subsequent to the date of the statement of grant income and expenditure which require adjustment or disclosure so as to present fairly the statement of grant income and expenditure, have been adjusted or disclosed. [Where applicable] The effects of uncorrected misstatements are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the statement of grant income and expenditure as a whole. A list of the uncorrected misstatements is attached to this representation letter. That all Grantee contributions and other financial assistance were spent for the purpose of the project and in accordance with the grant agreement and that the Grantee has complied with the grant agreement and relevant accounting policies. That salaries and allowances paid to persons involved in the project are in accordance with any applicable award or agreement in force under any relevant law on industrial or workplace relations. Signature Name [enter name] Director Date [dd/mm/yyyy] Signature Name [enter name] Director Date [dd/mm/yyyy] For Auditor use only I certify that this statement of grant income and expenditure is the one used to prepare my independent audit report dated [enter date] for the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. Signature Name [enter name] Position [enter position] Auditor’s employer [enter employer name] Date [dd/mm/yyyy] Attachment B - Independent audit report Background for auditors The purpose of the independent audit report is to provide us with an auditor's opinion on the Grantee’s statement of grant income and expenditure. The statement of grant income and expenditure is prepared by the Grantee to correspond with the expenditure reported to the department by the Grantee for the same period, in the process of claiming grant payments. The independent audit report must be prepared by a person who is an approved auditor. An approved auditor is a person who is: registered as a company auditor under the Corporations Xxx 0000 or an appropriately qualified member of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, or of CPA Australia or the Institute of Public Accountants; and not a principal, member, shareholder, officer, agent, subcontractor or employee of the Grantee or of a related body corporate or a Connected Entity. The audit should be undertaken and reported in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. The independent audit report must follow the required format and include any qualification regarding the matters on which the auditor provides an opinion. We may follow up any qualifications with the Grantee or auditor. The independent audit report must be submitted on the auditor's letterhead. Auditors must comply with the professional requirements of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, CPA Australia and the Institute of Public Accountants in the conduct of their audit. If the auditor forms an opinion that the statement of grant income and expenditure does not give a true and fair view of the eligible expenditure for the period, the independent audit report should be qualified and the error quantified in the qualification section of the independent audit report. The required independent audit report format follows. Auditor’s report Independent audit report in relation to [Grantee name]’s statement of grant income and expenditure to the Commonwealth, represented by the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (the department). We have audited: the accompanying statement of grant income and expenditure of [Grantee name] for the period [dd/mm/yyyy] to [dd/mm/yyyy], a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and management’s attestation statement thereon (together “the financial statement”). The financial statement has been prepared by management using the cash basis of accounting described in note 3.2 to the financial statement; and [Grantee name]'s compliance with the terms of the grant agreement between [Grantee name] and the Commonwealth dated [date of agreement] for the period [dd/mm/yyyy] to [dd/mm/yyyy] (the grant agreement). We have: reviewed [Grantee name]’s statement of labour costs in support of its claim of eligible expenditure[; and performed limited assurance procedures on [Grantee name]’s statement of employee numbers under the grant agreement]. Management’s responsibility Management is responsible for: the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement in accordance with the basis of accounting described in note 3.2, this includes determining that the cash basis of accounting is an acceptable basis for the preparation of the financial statement in accordance with the grant agreement; compliance with the terms of the grant agreement; the preparation of the statement of employee numbers and labour costs in support of eligible expenditure; and such internal control as management determines is necessary to: enable the preparation of the financial statement and the statement of [employee numbers and ]labour costs that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and enable compliance with the terms of the grant agreement. Auditor’s responsibility Our responsibilities are: To express an opinion, based on our audit, on: the financial statement; and [Grantee name]’s compliance, in all material respects, with the terms of the grant agreement; and To conclude based on: our review procedures, on the statement of labour costs; and our limited assurance procedures on the statement of employee numbers. We conducted our audit of the financial statement in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards; our audit of compliance with the grant agreement in accordance with ASAE 3100, our review of the statement of labour costs in accordance with ASRE 2405[; and our limited assurance procedures on employee numbers in accordance with ASAE 3000]. The applicable Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements and plan and perform our work to: obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free from material misstatement and that [Grantee name] has complied, in all material respects, with the terms of the grant agreement; and obtain limited assurance as to whether anything has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the statements of employee numbers and labour costs are materially misstated. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement and about the Grantee’s compliance with the grant agreement. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statement, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Grantee’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement, and to the Grantee’s compliance with the grant agreement, in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Grantee’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement.

  • Other Data The statistical, industry-related and market-related data included in the Registration Statement, the Statutory Prospectus and the Prospectus, if any, are based on or derived from sources that the Company reasonably and in good faith believes are reliable and accurate, and such data agree with the sources from which they are derived.

  • Source of Data A description of (1) the process used to identify claims in the Population, and (2) the specific documentation relied upon by the IRO when performing the Quarterly Claims Review (e.g., medical records, physician orders, certificates of medical necessity, requisition forms, local medical review policies (including title and policy number), CMS program memoranda (including title and issuance number), Medicare contractor manual or bulletins (including issue and date), other policies, regulations, or directives).‌‌‌

  • Use of Data (a) In connection with the provision of the services and the discharge of its other obligations under this Agreement, State Street (which term for purposes of this Section XXIX includes each of its parent company, branches and affiliates (''Affiliates")) may collect and store information regarding a Trust and share such information with its Affiliates, agents and service providers in order and to the extent reasonably necessary (i) to carry out the provision of services contemplated under this Agreement and other agreements between the Trusts and State Street or any of its Affiliates and (ii) to carry out management of its businesses, including, but not limited to, financial and operational management and reporting, risk management, legal and regulatory compliance and client service management.

  • Accuracy of Data (A) The Contractor shall ensure that the data received from Providers is accurate and complete by:

  • Use of Data by User Registry Operator will permit user to use the zone file for lawful purposes; provided that (a) user takes all reasonable steps to protect against unauthorized access to and use and disclosure of the data and (b) under no circumstances will Registry Operator be required or permitted to allow user to use the data to, (i) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by email, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than user’s own existing customers, or (ii) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator or any ICANN-­‐accredited registrar.

  • Data To permit evaluation of requests under paragraph (c) of this clause based on unreasonable cost, the Contractor shall include the following information and any applicable supporting data based on the survey of suppliers: Foreign and Domestic Construction Materials Cost Comparison Construction material description Unit of measure Quantity Cost (dollars) * Item 1: Foreign construction material Domestic construction material Item 2 Foreign construction material Domestic construction material [List name, address, telephone number, and contact for suppliers surveyed. Attach copy of response; if oral, attach summary.] [Include other applicable supporting information.] (*Include all delivery costs to the construction site.]

  • Protection of Data The Contractor agrees to store Data on one or more of the following media and protect the Data as described:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.