Evaluation Results definition

Evaluation Results. Recipients must report evaluation results for the work completed to date (including findings from process or outcome evaluations). • Work Plan: Recipients must update work plan each budget period to reflect any changes in period of performance outcomes, activities, timeline, etc. • Successes o Recipients must report progress on completing activities and progress towards achieving the period of performance outcomes described in the logic model and work plan. o Recipients must describe any additional successes (e.g. identified through evaluation results or lessons learned) achieved in the past year. o Recipients must describe success stories. • Challenges o Recipients must describe any challenges that hindered or might hinder their ability to complete the work plan activities and achieve the period of performance outcomes. o Recipients must describe any additional challenges (e.g., identified through evaluation results or lessons learned) encountered in the past year. • CDC Program Support to Recipients o Recipients must describe how CDC could help them overcome challenges to complete activities in the work plan and achieving period of performance outcomes. • Administrative Reporting (No page limit) o SF-424A Budget Information-Non-Construction Programs. o Budget Narrative – Must use the format outlined in "Content and Form of Application Submission, Budget Narrative" section. o Indirect Cost Rate Agreement. The recipients must submit the Annual Performance Report via xxx.Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx no later than 120 days prior to the end of the budget period.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Evaluation Results means the results of the Preliminary Evaluation Work and Evaluation Studies.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Results. Awardees must report evaluation results for the work completed to date (including findings from process or outcome evaluations).
Sample 1

Examples of Evaluation Results in a sentence

  • Evaluation Results for Carrier Phase PositioningBackground Submitted Proposals:(Nokia, R1-2203178[2]) Proposal 2: Capture the above simulation results in the TR.

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed edits for improving factuality in the model- generated outputs, we compare the summariza- tion performance of a model trained using a simple fine-tuning (STF) approach optimizing on ℓce vs the preference-based DPO training Table 2: External Evaluation Results ROUGE Factualityapproach that optimizes ℓdpo and uses our proposed synthetic imitation edit pipeline for generating preference data.

  • Evaluation Results: Visioning Workshop Partes Pasjane”, July 2011.

  • Educational exercises include 1) Pre-departure self-assessments and objective setting; 2) Interactive interprofessional field orientation; 3) Promp- ted self-reflections; 4) Literature reviews and discussions; and 5) independent projects mentored by Haitian and UCSF faculty.Outcome & Evaluation: Results of the first year’s evaluation indi- cated that fellows need structured mentorship in core competencies.

  • Evaluation Results for Underrepresented Undergraduate Students: Campus Climate in the Area of Student Life/Campus Experience CSEQ resultsThe survey results of the CSEQ questions related to student life and campus experience are listed in the middle panel of Table I-6.

  • Surveyors may attempt to capture several fish per stream by hook-and-line for sample-in-hand confirmation of species identifications by snorkelers.2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 Lake Chelan Tributaries Spawning Monitoring and Evaluation Results Results from the 2009 Lake Chelan tributary trout spawning surveys and snorkel surveys are summarized in Tables 2 through 7.

  • Evaluation Results in Step 4 A SV F U NF P Blaschke 14 10 2 2 83.33%After computing the overall performance, the average value is 73.33%, where 30 keywords have appeared in the reference corpus and we found 22 collocates.

  • I.A.1.a.i. Evaluation Results for Undergraduate Students: in the Area of Academic/Classroom Experience CSEQ results2006 CSEQ responses represent a positive campus climate (either above 2.5 out of 5 or above 5 out of 7) for underrepresented groups.The 2006 survey results of the CSEQ questions related to academic/classroom experience are listed in the top panel of Table I-6.

  • The Company will continue making efforts to maintain among the top with respect to the Corporate Governance Evaluation Results.

  • Subsequently, these scores are sorted in ascending order, and further, the cor- rect triple rank can be obtained.Three standard metrics are employed to evaluate the performance of link prediction:1Datasets could be found at onedrive: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ajh jEjaTE0SbbceogcmdwSu9ME?e=zfw6sN Table 2: Evaluation Results on FB15K and WN18.

Related to Evaluation Results

  • Evaluation means an appraisal of an individual’s professional performance in relation to his or her job description and professional standards and based on, when applicable, the individual’s evaluation rubric.

  • Evaluation Team means the team appointed by the City; “Information Meeting” has the meaning set out in section 2.2;

  • Project Results means all data and results of the Project.

  • Evaluation Criteria means the criteria set out under the clause 27 (Evaluation Process) of this Part C, which includes the Qualifying Criteria, Functional Criteria and Price and Preferential Points Assessment.

  • Evaluation Material shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 6.3(a).

  • Evaluation Period bears the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 13.5(d)(i);

  • Root Cause Analysis Report means a report addressing a problem or non-conformance, in order to get to the ‘root cause’ of the problem, which thereby assists in correcting or eliminating the cause, and prevent the problem from recurring.

  • Evaluation Date shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3.1(s).

  • Results means any information, documentation, designs, technical drawings, software (system and application software), algorithms, elaborated design data, technical or industrial data, tools, knowledge, know-how, trade secrets, equipment and services process, methodology, and any intellectual property therein, regardless of their support and whether or notprotected byan intellectual property right, developed, created or acquired by one Party during the execution of the Contract. The Results shall become the exclusive property of Purchaser as and when they are created or developed.

  • Study means the investigation to be conducted in accordance with the Protocol.

  • Clinical evaluation means a systematic and planned process to continuously generate, collect, analyse and assess the clinical data pertaining to a device in order to verify the safety and performance, including clinical benefits, of the device when used as intended by the manufacturer;

  • Forensic analysis means the practice of gathering, retaining, and analyzing computer-related data for investigative purposes in a manner that maintains the integrity of the data.

  • Review means a financial or operational audit, investigation, inspection or other form of review requested or required by the LHIN under the terms of LHSIA or this Agreement, but does not include the annual audit of the HSP’s financial statements;

  • Research Results means any technical result acquired based on the Collaborative Research, including, but not limited to, any invention, idea, design, copyrightable work and know-how which relates to the purpose of the Collaborative Research.

  • Valuation Report means the valuation report or reports for mortgage purposes, in the form of the pro-forma contained in the Standard Documentation, obtained by the Seller from a Valuer in respect of each Mortgaged Property or a valuation report in respect of a valuation made using a methodology which would be acceptable to a reasonable prudent mortgage lender;

  • Evaluation Committee Report means a report prepared by the Procurement Manager and the Evaluation Committee for contract award. It will contain written determinations resulting from the procurement.

  • Utilization review means the prospective (prior to), concurrent (during) or retrospective (after) review of any service to determine whether such service was properly authorized, constitutes a medically necessary service for purposes of benefit payment, and is a covered healthcare service under this plan. WE, US, and OUR means Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island. WE, US, or OUR will have the same meaning whether italicized or not. YOU and YOUR means the subscriber or member enrolled for coverage under this agreement. YOU and YOUR will have the same meaning whether italicized or not.

  • Studies means activities needed to prepare project implementation, such as preparatory, mapping, feasibility, evaluation, testing and validation studies, including in the form of software, and any other technical support measure, including prior action to define and develop a project and decide on its financing, such as reconnaissance of the sites concerned and preparation of the financial package;

  • Evaluation Committee means a body appointed to perform the evaluation of Offerors’ proposals.

  • Periodic Review means a review conducted by Ofwat for the purpose of determining one or more Price Controls in accordance with Part III of Condition B, but so that references in Part IV of Condition B to a Periodic Review shall exclude any review carried out under paragraph 11 of that Condition and shall include the determination by the Competition and Markets Authority of the relevant questions or, as the case may be, the disputed determination referred to it under paragraph 16 of Condition B;

  • Evaluator means Advisors Asset Management Inc., and its successors in interest, or any successor evaluator appointed as hereinafter provided."