Additional RO Review Criteria Sample Clauses

Additional RO Review Criteria. (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (32)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Additional RO Review Criteria. If the requested plants are not listed on the EPL/PPS for the area at any botanical level (such as, types, species or cultivars), the RO will determine if the plants are listed on an EPL/PPS contained in another RO’s area. The pricing information on another RO’s EPL/PPS, if available, must be used unless the price in the producer’s catalog is lower than that listed on the EPL/PPS, then the producer’s catalog price will be used to establish the producer’s inventory value and to determine the loss.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (15)
Additional RO Review Criteria. (1) In addition to the requirements of Subparagraph 34A, to approve a request for a WA, all of the following conditions applicable for the specific request must be met. If any condition is not met, the request for a WA must be denied. The conditions that must be met are:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
Additional RO Review Criteria. In addition to the requirements of Subparagraph 34A, the RO must examine whether the yield for the reclaimed acreage is comparable to other similar insured acreage of the producer, the county or the surrounding area. If the producer’s acreage is not similar, then:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
Additional RO Review Criteria. In accordance with Subparagraph 34A, the request for a WA cannot be approved unless:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
Additional RO Review Criteria. (1) In accordance with Subparagraph 34A, the RO must assess the impact of the requested rotation deviation on yield and risk, and the RO must make appropriate adjustments in the WA offer. If the data suggests:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
Additional RO Review Criteria. (1) In addition to the requirements in Subpara. 34A, the RO must:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Additional RO Review Criteria. (1) In addition to the requirements of Subparagraph 34A, a request for a WA may be approved on dry bean types not designated in the AD or Special Provisions, provided that insurance for dry beans is available in the county. In a state that has a Garbanzo Bean type on any dry bean AD, a TD request may be applicable for Garbanzo Beans if insurance for dry beans is available in the requesting county (if a Garbanzo Bean type is not on any AD in the state, an XC request is required).
Sample 1

Related to Additional RO Review Criteria

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Claims Review Objective A clear statement of the objective intended to be achieved by the Claims Review.

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Acceptance Criteria 6.7.2.1. During the test there shall be no evidence of:

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of:

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.