Field Visits. The Board and the UFT recognizes the importance of field work for Centrally-Funded attendance teachers. Centrally-Funded Attendance Teachers will have two days per month designated exclusively for fieldwork, the specific days must be pre-scheduled and approved by their supervisor. Requests for specific days shall not be unreasonably denied. Centrally-Funded Attendance Teachers may be assigned to additional days dedicated exclusively to fieldwork with reasonable notice by the Superintendent or designee.
Field Visits. Conduct field visits to the project’s selected service delivery points (SDPs)/health facilities in the project’s selected LGAs in all 3 focus states, and to selected communities in which the project operated to observe the activities of collaborating community partners: the team may also select other non-project SDPs/facilities and LGAs to visit, and should interact with appropriate state-level health decision-makers to determine their knowledge of the project.
Field Visits. We will provide assistance to you in the development and operation of your Healthy Bites Grill Franchise by means of periodic visits by one of our field representatives (not less than 12 times per year).
Field Visits. All field work and on-site observations shall be coordinated with the evaluation Project Director, Xxxxx Xxxxxx and/or Academic Leader, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx.
Field Visits. All fieldwork will be done on-site and coordinated with Eastbrook's Curriculum Specialist.
Field Visits. CONSULTANT shall perform a minimum of one field visit to review existing conditions prior to commencement of Surveying Services. A report outlining this visit shall be prepared by CONSULTANT and submitted to the COUNTY.
Field Visits. Field visits are an important source for data and information on progress and quality of implementation. Field visits have four objectives: (i) they are an important way to validate the data collected from all sources; (ii) they provide important qualitative information, (qualitative tests) outside the context of detailed evaluation studies; (iii) they provide the Ministry and central agencies with direct exposure to the challenges and opportunities of initiatives; and (iv) they allow for greater cooperation between the regions and the center, creating greater cohesion between the implementing parties. Periodic site visits for monitoring should not be confused with evaluations. The purpose of site visits is grounded in monitoring, which is fixed on operational management; evaluations are a detailed examination of issues and require expertise in primary data collection and in statistical methods. Site visits will be framed by a number of tools, each relevant to the type of activity or type of host entity. These tools are designed to provide quantitative and qualitative information; and instruments to be employed include tailored questionnaires, checklists, and observation guides that seek information about initiative implementation, usually for a specified period of time. They will be used to gather information on the target groups, participation rates and user feedback. Although some quantitative information may already be reported through routine channels, here the objective is validation. The qualitative elements of monitoring seek information about meaning and value that various social actors attribute to the actions being implemented.12 The qualitative elements answer questions related to the effect that initiatives are having student learning, on teaching, or on the lives of the target groups in general. Importantly, monitoring visits provide information on challenges and opportunities during initiative implementation, these will raise flags if an investment does not appear to be producing the expected results and if it needs to be adjusted or redesigned. Additionally, site visits will reveal questions and issues that may need to be addressed during in-depth evaluations. It is evident at this point that although monitoring and evaluation are different and require different approaches and skills, they also intersect. Monitoring and evaluation examine similar areas but monitoring acts as an early warning system that may trigger in-depth evaluations, it ...
Field Visits. Field visits will be undertaken to clarify geographic locations, to complete questionnaires, to take photographs, and to map the properties if access to these places is considered appropriate by Tribal elders. Field visits should be coordinated with the NPS and the City, when appropriate. Dialogues between the interviewer(s) and Tribal informants may be taped and transcribed, so long as consent is first obtained from the Tribal Councils of the affected Tribes.
Field Visits. HDR team will conduct periodic site visits throughout the duration of the project to observe construction progress, observe deficient work identified by the City and witness field tests as requested.
Field Visits. In preparation for the Field Visits, the Commission of Experts Evaluators must conduct two key activities – the revision of the SAR submitted by HEI and a pre-visit meeting with the HEI. Revision of the SAR: for this purpose, the Commission of Experts Evaluators uses the standards and indicators corresponding to this Audit Guideline. The revision consists of identifying gaps in relation to this Guideline and checking consistency and completeness between the narrative and supporting parts of the SAR (Parts A and B of the SAR). The Commission of Experts Evaluators may request additional information and clarifications to the HEI before organizing the pre-visit meeting. The pre-visit meeting: it takes place in the HEI premises. The Commission of Experts Evaluators meets the HEI’s team managing the QA evaluation process and involved in the preparation of the SAR. The objective is to identify the information that will be required during the Field Visit in accordance with the SAR presented and to the corresponding standards and indicators for the QA evaluation in the course. Following these two activities, the Commission of Experts Evaluators conduct a Field Visit to the HEI with objectives that are similar to those guiding the revision of the SARs. The first objective is to verify the correspondence between Parts A and the data provided in Part B of the SAR, in this case, contrasting this with the institutional reality and additional stakeholders’ views. The second objective is to complete data that may be missing or incomplete in relation to the standards and indicators corresponding to the QA in point, on which bases the SAR was structured. In these activities, the Commission of Experts Evaluators observes the level of achievement of the given object of evaluation with the relevant standards and indicators. In order to conduct this verification, completion of data gathering, and assessment of performance, the Commission of Experts Evaluators will use visit sheets. The Field Visits last between 3 and 4 days, depending on the availability of different stakeholders to meet and on the needed travel arrangements, and must include the following activities: A first meeting with the management of the HEI and management units to present the plan of work for the duration of the visit. A meeting with the teaching staff, conducting didactic and support activities. A meeting with a group of students, with no less than 15 participants, including students representing studen...
