Methodology. 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.
Methodology. The Contractor shall, at least 15 (fifteen) days prior to the commencement of the construction, submit to the Authority’s Engineer for review and consent the methodology proposed to be adopted for executing the Works, giving details of equipment to be deployed, traffic management and measures for ensuring safety. The Authority’s Engineer shall complete the review and convey its consent to the Contractor within a period of 10 (ten) days from the date of receipt of the proposed methodology from the Contractor.
Methodology. CMS agrees to pay the MA Organization under this contract in accordance with the provisions of section 1853 of the Act and 42 CFR Part 422 Subpart G. [422.504(a)(9)]
Methodology. CMS agrees to pay the M+C Organization under this contract in accordance with the provisions of section 1853 of the Act and subpart F of part 422. [422.502(a)(9)]
Methodology. The Contractor shall, at least 15 (fifteen) days prior to the commencement of any construction activity, submit to the Authority Engineer for review the Method Statement proposed to be adopted for executing the Work, giving details of inspection checklist, quality parameters, equipment to be deployed, traffic management and measures for ensuring safety. The Authority Engineer shall complete the review and convey its comments, if any, to the Contractor within a period of 10 (ten) days from the date of receipt of the proposed method statement from the Contractor. The Contractor shall revise the method statements by incorporating these comments or else will advise the Authority Engineer reasons for not/partially including the same.
Methodology. At the time of the Triennial Study, historical costs (to include costs directly related to maintaining and administering policies, processing claims and reporting results) will be determined for the Policy Maintenance Factor identified above. For a given Annual Expense Reimbursement Factor the identified costs will be divided by the total historical number of units of measure for both the Reinsured Contracts and the retained block of business to derive an historical cost per unit. The historical cost per unit will be used as a prospective cost per unit for the next calendar year. For the two succeeding years in the period between the Triennial Studies the historical dollar amounts by Policy Maintenance Factor will be adjusted (rolled forward) for current year cost changes agreed to by the Reinsurer and the Company (in accordance with the procedures set forth below). This rolled forward historical cost will then be divided by the total historical number of units for the current period to determine a prospective cost per unit for the next calendar year. An additional adjustment, positive or negative, to the prospective cost per unit determined by either the Triennial Study or the two succeeding years may be negotiated between the parties. The additional adjustment is for special projected costs or benefits of productivity, process improvements, inflation, loss of scale, and any other cost variation which was not included in the prior Triennial Study or the succeeding roll forward. The combined prospective unit cost and additional adjustment is the Annual Expense Reimbursement Factor. The Expense Allowance will be determined quarterly and billed to the Reinsurer in three equal installments during the quarter at the end of the month. Each installment will be determined by multiplying the actual number of units at the beginning of the quarter covered by this Agreement times the Annual Expense Reimbursement Factor (divided by twelve).
Methodology i) Preparation of Performance Rating Data Sheet Performance rating data Sheet for each and every Vendor/ Supplier/Contractor/ Consultant for all orders/Contracts with a value of Rs. 7 Lakhs and above is recommended to be drawn up. These data sheets are to be separately prepared for orders/ contracts related to Projects and O&M. Format, Parameters, Process, responsibility for preparation of Performance Rating Data Sheet are separately mentioned.
Methodology. A. Revenue Covered by the Agreement and the Term of the TPR Agreement The TPR Agreement will become effective July 1, 2013 and will have a term of three years covering the State fiscal years ("SFY") 2014, 2015, and 2016 (the Rate Years). The TPR Agreement will be applicable to all HSCRC rate regulated inpatient and outpatient services and revenue of the Hospital. The Hospital has been subject to a prior TPR agreement that will end June 30, 2013 and be succeeded by this TPR Agreement. In each Rate Year, the Agreement will establish the Approved Regulated Revenue of the Hospital for the particular Rate Year, and the Approved Regulated Revenue, and associated Unit Rates for the Hospital will be set forth in the Hospital’s Order Nisi for the particular Rate Year.
Methodology. The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan employs objective mathematical principles which relate the borrower’s income, assets and liabilities to the proposed payment and such underwriting methodology does not rely on the extent of the borrower’s equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such credit extension. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the borrower had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan;
