Evaluation Team Composition Clause Samples
The Evaluation Team Composition clause defines how the group responsible for assessing proposals or bids is formed. It typically outlines the number of members, their qualifications, and the process for selecting them, ensuring that the team is suitably skilled and impartial. By establishing clear guidelines for team makeup, this clause helps ensure a fair and objective evaluation process, reducing the risk of bias or conflicts of interest.
Evaluation Team Composition. An evaluation team's composition shall be management and tenured professors to conduct the evaluation process. If by the end of the third (3rd) week of the fall semester, fewer than two professors have been selected by the department to serve on the team, the appropriate administrator shall appoint tenured professors from within the division so that at least two (2) professors serve on the team. A reduction or change in a team's composition during a contract period shall not, in and of itself, invalidate that particular evaluation process; however, every effort shall be made to ensure that a majority of the members of the evaluation team continue to serve on the evaluation team throughout the four-year evaluation process to facilitate effective evaluation of responses to recommendations and prescriptives.
Evaluation Team Composition. The recommended composition of the evaluation team will be of at least two senior consultants: an evaluation expert and a scientific expert. The evaluation team members should collectively demonstrate experience in all the thematic areas to be covered by the evaluation and should have no previous involvement in the design and implementation of activities under review. The consultants should possess the following mandatory qualifications and experience: Senior evaluator (team leader): • An advanced university degree in social sciences, economics, political science or one or more of the relevant fields related to the evaluation; (Master level or above) • At least 10 years of professional experience in designing and leading programme or policy evaluations at the international level; • Demonstrated experience in applying quantitative and qualitative data collection methods; • Excellent oral communication and writing skills in English; • Excellent analytical skills and skills in producing succinct, clear materials. Scientific expert: • An advanced university degree in hydrology, geoscience, oceanography or other relevant fields related to the evaluation; (Master level or above) • At least 10 years of professional experience in designing and leading programme and policy in one or more of the thematic fields related to the evaluation; • Excellent oral communication and writing skills in English; • Excellent analytical skills and skills in producing succinct, clear materials. Moreover, it is desirable that the evaluation team collectively demonstrates the following qualifications and characteristics: • Knowledge of the UN system and in particular of UNESCO’s programmes in the fields of Natural Science, notably IHP, MAB and IOC activities; • Experience with assignments for the UN; • Understanding and application of UN mandates in Human Rights and Gender Equality; • Experience in designing and conducting programme and policy evaluations in one or several of the fields covered by this evaluation. Preference will be given to evaluation teams that are gender-balanced and of geographically and culturally diverse backgrounds. Verification of these qualifications will be based on the provided technical proposals and CVs. Moreover, references, web links or electronic copies of two recently completed assignments should be provided (preferably evaluations in relation to programmes in the field of science). The evaluation assignment is estimated to require approximately 50 - ...
Evaluation Team Composition. The Evaluation Team for a part-time faculty member will consist of the supervising administrator and one (1) trained faculty evaluator.
19.7.1.1 Training for faculty evaluators and administrators will be offered during Professional Development day in Spring 2012, and thereafter as needed on subsequent Professional Development days. The District, Academic Senate, and GCFA representative/s will co-design and offer the training.
Evaluation Team Composition. Each school or division having probationary or pre-tenure faculty members shall establish at least one evaluation team. No team shall evaluate more than four faculty members in any single year, nor may any faculty member be evaluated by more than one team in any given academic year. The exact number of teams in a school or division shall be determined by the ▇▇▇▇ or director in consultation with departmental chairpersons and the F A President. Each team shall be composed of three faculty members, at least two of whom shall be tenured and all three shall have at least two years of service at SVSU. The first of the three shall be appointed by the appropriate ▇▇▇▇ or director after consultation with the departmental chairperson; the second shall be appointed by the Association; and, the third shall be selected and agreed upon by the first two appointees. Each team shall be selected during September of each year (January for mid-year appointments) and shall serve from October 1, next, (February 10 for mid-year appointments), through the end of the succeeding September. The appropriate ▇▇▇▇ or director shall convene the team(s) for a school or division by October 15 (February 15 for mid-year appointments) and the team chairperson shall then be chosen by the team from among its members. The team chairperson will be responsible for the team's meeting its deadline. Deans or directors shall forward a list of all probationary or pre-tenure faculty to be evaluated to the Vice President for Academic Affairs, the Association President and the individual faculty member on or before September 15 of each year. A list of all tenured faculty in each school and division shall be forwarded to the Association President at the same time.