Evaluation Team Composition Clause Samples

The Evaluation Team Composition clause defines how the group responsible for assessing proposals or bids is formed. It typically outlines the number of members, their qualifications, and the process for selecting them, ensuring that the team is suitably skilled and impartial. By establishing clear guidelines for team makeup, this clause helps ensure a fair and objective evaluation process, reducing the risk of bias or conflicts of interest.
Evaluation Team Composition. An evaluation team's composition shall be management and tenured professors to conduct the evaluation process. If by the end of the third (3rd) week of the fall semester, fewer than two professors have been selected by the department to serve on the team, the appropriate administrator shall appoint tenured professors from within the division so that at least two (2) professors serve on the team. A reduction or change in a team's composition during a contract period shall not, in and of itself, invalidate that particular evaluation process; however, every effort shall be made to ensure that a majority of the members of the evaluation team continue to serve on the evaluation team throughout the four-year evaluation process to facilitate effective evaluation of responses to recommendations and prescriptives.
View SourceView Similar (11)
Evaluation Team Composition. The recommended composition of the evaluation team will be of at least two senior consultants: an evaluation expert and a scientific expert. The evaluation team members should collectively demonstrate experience in all the thematic areas to be covered by the evaluation and should have no previous involvement in the design and implementation of activities under review. The consultants should possess the following mandatory qualifications and experience: Senior evaluator (team leader): • An advanced university degree in social sciences, economics, political science or one or more of the relevant fields related to the evaluation; (Master level or above) • At least 10 years of professional experience in designing and leading programme or policy evaluations at the international level; • Demonstrated experience in applying quantitative and qualitative data collection methods; • Excellent oral communication and writing skills in English; • Excellent analytical skills and skills in producing succinct, clear materials. Scientific expert: • An advanced university degree in hydrology, geoscience, oceanography or other relevant fields related to the evaluation; (Master level or above) • At least 10 years of professional experience in designing and leading programme and policy in one or more of the thematic fields related to the evaluation; • Excellent oral communication and writing skills in English; • Excellent analytical skills and skills in producing succinct, clear materials. Moreover, it is desirable that the evaluation team collectively demonstrates the following qualifications and characteristics: • Knowledge of the UN system and in particular of UNESCO’s programmes in the fields of Natural Science, notably IHP, MAB and IOC activities; • Experience with assignments for the UN; • Understanding and application of UN mandates in Human Rights and Gender Equality; • Experience in designing and conducting programme and policy evaluations in one or several of the fields covered by this evaluation. Preference will be given to evaluation teams that are gender-balanced and of geographically and culturally diverse backgrounds. Verification of these qualifications will be based on the provided technical proposals and CVs. Moreover, references, web links or electronic copies of two recently completed assignments should be provided (preferably evaluations in relation to programmes in the field of science). The evaluation assignment is estimated to require approximately 50 - ...
View Source
Evaluation Team Composition. The Evaluation Team for a part-time faculty member will consist of the supervising administrator and one (1) trained faculty evaluator. 19.7.1.1 Training for faculty evaluators and administrators will be offered during Professional Development day in Spring 2012, and thereafter as needed on subsequent Professional Development days. The District, Academic Senate, and GCFA representative/s will co-design and offer the training.
View Source
Evaluation Team Composition. Each school or division having probationary or pre-tenure faculty members shall establish at least one evaluation team. No team shall evaluate more than four faculty members in any single year, nor may any faculty member be evaluated by more than one team in any given academic year. The exact number of teams in a school or division shall be determined by the ▇▇▇▇ or director in consultation with departmental chairpersons and the F A President. Each team shall be composed of three faculty members, at least two of whom shall be tenured and all three shall have at least two years of service at SVSU. The first of the three shall be appointed by the appropriate ▇▇▇▇ or director after consultation with the departmental chairperson; the second shall be appointed by the Association; and, the third shall be selected and agreed upon by the first two appointees. Each team shall be selected during September of each year (January for mid-year appointments) and shall serve from October 1, next, (February 10 for mid-year appointments), through the end of the succeeding September. The appropriate ▇▇▇▇ or director shall convene the team(s) for a school or division by October 15 (February 15 for mid-year appointments) and the team chairperson shall then be chosen by the team from among its members. The team chairperson will be responsible for the team's meeting its deadline. Deans or directors shall forward a list of all probationary or pre-tenure faculty to be evaluated to the Vice President for Academic Affairs, the Association President and the individual faculty member on or before September 15 of each year. A list of all tenured faculty in each school and division shall be forwarded to the Association President at the same time.
View Source

Related to Evaluation Team Composition

  • Committee Composition The Redeployment Committee shall be comprised of equal numbers of representatives of the Hospital and of the Union. The number of representatives will be determined locally. Where for the purposes of HTAP (the Ontario Hospital Training and Adjustment Panel) there is another hospital-wide staffing and redeployment committee created or in existence, Union members of the Redeployment Committee shall serve on any such hospital-wide staffing committee established with the same or similar terms of reference, and the number of Union members on such committee will be proportionate to the number of its bargaining unit members at the particular Hospital in relation to other staff groups. Meetings of the Redeployment Committee shall be held during normal working hours. Time spent attending such meetings shall be deemed to be work time for which the representative(s) shall be paid by the Hospital at his or her regular or premium rate as may be applicable. Each party shall appoint a co-chair for the Redeployment Committee. Co-chairs shall chair alternative meetings of the Committee and will be jointly responsible for establishing the agenda of the Committee meetings, preparing minutes and writing such correspondence as the Committee may direct.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluation Committee A. The Association and the Board agree to establish a standing joint Evaluation Committee comprised of members of the District Leadership Council for the purpose of evaluating the policy, procedure and process for the evaluation of certified teachers in the District.

  • Formation and Composition The Parties to this agreement will maintain a Joint Administration and Dispute Resolution Committee (JADRC) consisting of five (5) representatives of the employers and five (5) representatives of the Provincial Bargaining Council.

  • Clinical 1.1 Provides comprehensive evidence based nursing care and individual case management to a specific group of patients/clients including assessment, intervention and evaluation. 1.2 Undertakes clinical shifts at the direction of senior staff and the Nursing Director including participation on the on-call/after-hours/weekend roster if required. 1.3 Responsible and accountable for patient safety and quality of care through planning, coordinating, performing, facilitating, and evaluating the delivery of patient care relating to a particular group of patients, clients or staff in the practice setting. 1.4 Monitors, reviews and reports upon the standard of nursing practice to ensure that colleagues are working within the scope of nursing practice, following appropriate clinical pathways, policies, procedures and adopting a risk management approach in patient care delivery. 1.5 Participates in ▇▇▇▇ rounds/case conferences as appropriate. 1.6 Educates patients/carers in post discharge management and organises discharge summaries/referrals to other services, as appropriate. 1.7 Supports and liaises with patients, carers, colleagues, medical, nursing, allied health, support staff, external agencies and the private sector to provide coordinated multidisciplinary care. 1.8 Completes clinical documentation and undertakes other administrative/management tasks as required. 1.9 Participates in departmental and other meetings as required to meet organisational and service objectives. 1.10 Develops and seeks to implement change utilising expert clinical knowledge through research and evidence based best practice. 1.11 Monitors and maintains availability of consumable stock. 1.12 Complies with and demonstrates a positive commitment to Regulations, Acts and Policies relevant to nursing including the Code of Ethics for Nurses in Australia, the Code of Conduct for Nurses in Australia, the National Competency Standards for the Registered Nurse and the Poisons Act 2014 and Medicines and Poisons Regulations 2016. 1.13 Promotes and participates in team building and decision making. 1.14 Responsible for the clinical supervision of nurses at Level 1 and/or Enrolled Nurses/ Assistants in Nursing under their supervision.