Although Xx. Xxxxxxxx is intended to be replaced as a member of the board of directors at the upcoming extraordinary general meeting of the Company, there are no intentions to replace Xx. Xxxxxxxx as the CEO of the Company. Xxx Xxxxxxxx, CEO • CFO at Pareto Business Management AB • CEO of Gbg Office 1 AB (publ) • Business manager for Bonäsudden Holding AB (publ) and Delarka Holding AB (publ) • 6 years’ experience from Audit of real estate companies at PwC • Authorized Public Accountant since 2013 • MSc in Economics and Business at Stockholm School of Economics
Although Xx. Xxxxxx was already employed by the circuit court as a court clerk III, Official Manual of the State of Missouri 1985-86, p. 272, Judge Xxxxxx ordered that she receive $200.00 per month in additional compensation for her duties as a receiver. L.F. 17. Judge Xxxxxx ordered the receiver to “hold said sums for the benefit of unlocated class members indefinitely.” L.F. 26.
Although Xx. Xxxxxx waives his rights to bring legal claims against Zila, including claims under the ADEA, Xx. Xxxxxx retains his right (as provided by applicable law) to challenge the validity of his waiver of ADEA claims under this Severance Agreement. If Xx. Xxxxxx chooses to challenge the validity of the ADEA release provided by this Severance Agreement, the litigation costs, including attorneys' fees, of the parties related to that challenge will be paid as provided by applicable law and/or as ordered by the court hearing the challenge.
Although Xx. Xxxxxx is not otherwise entitled to it, in consideration of her acceptance of this Separation Agreement, Xxxxxx agrees to accelerate her vesting schedule by amending the terms of her Stock Option Agreement with regard to the Vesting Schedule in her Notice of Stock Option Grant so that a total of 75,000 shares, including previously vested shares, will become vested on October 31, 1999. Additionally, in consideration of Xx. Xxxxxx'x acceptance of this Separation Agreement, the Company has also agreed to provide electronic mail and voicemail capabilities through Cobalt's internal network until October 31, 1999.
Although Xx. Xxx will make all reasonable efforts to keep electronic communications confidential and secure, neither Out of the Box Direct Primary Care LLC nor Xx. Xxx can assure or guarantee the absolute confidentiality of such; (c) Any electronic communications may become a part of a member’s medical record. If a response to an e-mail message is not received within two days, the member agrees to use another means of communication to contact the Practice. Neither Out of the Box Direct Primary Care LLC, nor Xx. Xxx will be liable for any loss, cost, injury, or expense caused by, or resulting from, a delay in response as a result of technical failures, including, but not limited to, (i) technical failures attributable to any internet service provider, (ii) power outages, failure of any electronic messaging software, or failure to properly address e-mail messages, (iii) failure of the Practice’s computers or computer network, or faulty telephone or cable data transmission, (iv) any interception of e-mail communications by a third party; or (v) member’s failure to comply with the guidelines regarding use of e-mail communications set forth in this paragraph.
Although Xx. Xxxxx contacted the Lakes Division bands on July 10, 2009 to organize consultation meetings in regard to the amendments to the MDA and the transfer of the timber administration, she did not attempt to set up meetings to discuss the incorporation after the July 2, 2009 meeting with Xx. Xxxxxxx. Moreover, due to the government's insistence that there would be no funding for the negotiation of a consultation agreement, the Band's view that the funds offered for the consultation process were inadequate to resource the information gathering studies necessary to properly understand the impact of the proposed decisions on their rights, the limited scope of the framework agreement proposed by the government and its deadlines for completion of the consultation, and the limited accommodations offered to date, the Band did not believe further meetings would be fruitful. 97 On November 2, 2009, Xx. Xxxxx again wrote to the Lakes Division bands to advise them of the November 27 and 28, 2009 public meetings scheduled to discuss the updated Technical Report. He also outlined the contents of the update. In addition, Xx. Xxxxx described the accommodation the government was prepared to make with regard to incorporation as a result of its consultation with the Lakes Division bands as follows: In response to comments received during consultation with you, the Province proposes the creation of an advisory committee that would include First Nations representatives to provide advice to the new municipal council on land matters. In addition, the new municipality will need to consider consultation with First Nations in the development and amendments to the municipality's Official Community Plan, which will require the approval of the Minister of Community and Rural Development. ... The [MDA] will not be affected by a change in local governance. Should the Sun Peaks community incorporate as a mountain resort municipality, the Official Community Plan will need to be consistent with the MDA.
Although Xx. Xxxx sometimes uses her blog to cover non-news related items, she consistently uses it to cover items related to local government, including the article at issue here. Although there is some risk that the court would focus on the personal and non-news related items in Xx. Xxxx'x blog, it is likely that it would also consider that she is filling a void that is left by the death of local newspapers covering similar topics of public concern.
Although Xx. Xxxxxxx is not directly involved in the banana stakeholder analysis, a lot of ideas and knowledge came from him. At the start of the project, it was known that mul- tiple stakeholders were involved in this case. Less clear was the actual problems of these stakeholders. While the farmers indicated that they did not have any prob- lems at all, Xx. Xxxxxxx explained that they needed help on multiple aspects. There were also a lot of conflicting requirements and demands between the stakeholders. For example: the agricultural department wants to collect as much information as possible from the farmers, while the farmers do not want to spend too much ef- fort in filling out the information forms. The factory had as main goal: knowing the amount of banana for the coming months, so that they can prepare for that. In the end, a decision had to be made about what stakeholder demands to include in the system. We tried to make an trade-off between the interests for the farmer and the agricultural department. This trade-off means that the collection information con- sists of a few forms, that should be filled in monthly. Because the forms need to be filled in on a monthly basis, this does not require a lot of effort from the farmer. But it is still possible to collect useful information from the farms.
