Staff Recommendations Sample Clauses

Staff Recommendations. Information or advice provided by Department staff, including management plans, are recommendations only and do not guarantee specific results or that property objectives will be met. Department staff shall have sole discretion over the type and manner of data which shall be collected during the site visit.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Staff Recommendations. The May 2, 2019 meeting is a study session and no action is required. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission use this meeting to: • Review the proposed Development Agreement; • Invite the public to comment on the proposed Development Agreement; • Ask clarifying questions and provide feedback about the proposed Development Agreement to staff and MGP; and • Provide direction to staff and MGP as to any additional information the Planning Commission might need to formulate a recommendation to City Council following the Public Hearing on May 16, 2019. Next Steps Unless additional study of this item is requested by the Planning Commission, staff will schedule a Public Hearing for May 16, 2019 at which the Planning Commission will deliberate and make its recommendation to the City Council. Staff anticipates the Development Agreement will be discussed by City Council on June 17, with potential action taken on July 22. Attachments Attachment A – Development Agreement Content and Criteria Attachment B – Planned Action Ordinance No. 705 Attachment C - Aurora Square Community Renewal Area Plan Attachment D - SEPA Planned Action Determination of Consistency Amended Planned Action Determination of Consistency Attachment E – Proposed Development Agreement and Exhibits Exhibit A - Legal Description of Property. Exhibit B – Property. Exhibit CPublic Benefit Matrix. Exhibit DConceptual Guide Plan. Exhibit EOpen Space System. Exhibit F - Supplemental Site Design Guidelines. Exhibit G – Westminster Way Improvements. Exhibit H – Street Sections and Design Plans. Exhibit I - Open Space System Operations & Maintenance Plan. Exhibit J - Illustrations of Modifications to Land Use Regulations. Exhibit K - Net New PM Peak Hour Trip Accounting Tool. Exhibit L – Vested Provisions of Title 20 SMC (Not Included: Existing Codes to be assembled w/ Ordinance). Exhibit M - Shoreline Place Open Space Potential Credit Calculations. Attachment F – Index of Development Agreement Sections Attachment G - MGP and City Staff Responses to Decision Criteria
Staff Recommendations. Staff recommends the Fourth Joint Facilities Agreement between San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District and San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, upon satisfactory review by Counsel of both agencies, be forwarded to a future Board of Directors’ Meeting for consideration.
Staff Recommendations a. The teacher members of each division, in conjunction with the division Xxxx, shall jointly recommend educational policy and procedures to the College President and the Board.
Staff Recommendations. Staff recommends approval of a lease with one of the entities whose proposals are attached and were submitted on time based on Xxxxxx County’s request for proposals. Issues and Opportunities: Based on Commissioners Court interests, there exists opportunities to generate revenue through leasing the property. This lease is specifically for hunting and grazing on the property. Fiscal Impact and Source of Funding: Leases generate revenue that benefits local school districts.
Staff Recommendations. Liberty Utilities shall comply with 4 CSR 240-10.030 (38) and test, repair or replace affected water meters within one hundred eighty (180) days of the effective date of the Commission order. Liberty Utilities shall develop a customer complaint log as described in CXD Staff’s recommendation. Tariff Review Staff recommends combining the four existing tariffs for water and the two existing tariffs for sewer so that one set of rules applies to all facilities. Any necessary rules specific to a particular service area would be retained. Since some portions of the existing tariffs have not been updated in more than 20 years, replacing them with an updated consolidated tariff would also bring compliance with current regulations.
Staff Recommendations. Our Bond Counsel approached the city with an opportunity to assist a developer in the metro and by doing so the City would have no responsibility for repayment, plus receive an issuer fee. The Policy and Finance Committee, our Financial Advisors and legal counsel agree and have experience with such a transaction. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Administrator that Council approves Option #1, setting the public hearing on the execution of the Memorandum of Agreement with Brio of Xxxxxxxx, LLC and on the proposed issuance of revenue bonds for August 7, 2017. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST WesleyLife is requesting the City to issue conduit bonds in an amount of $8,000,000 to $8,500,000 for its affiliate, Brio of Xxxxxxxx, LLC (the “Borrower”) for a continuing care retirement community located at 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx in Johnston, Iowa.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Staff Recommendations

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) The Company hereby consents to the Offer and represents, as of the date of this Agreement, that the Company Board, at a meeting duly called and held, has unanimously made the Company Board Recommendation. Subject in each case to Section 6.1(b), the Company hereby consents to the inclusion of a description of the Company Board Recommendation in the Offer Documents and, during the Pre-Closing Period, neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) (A) fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), or publicly propose to fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), the Company Board Recommendation or (B) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or publicly propose to approve, recommend, endorse or declare advisable, any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) fail to include the Company Board Recommendation in the Schedule 14D-9 when disseminated to the Company’s stockholders (any action described in clause (i) or (ii) being referred to as a “Company Adverse Change Recommendation”), (iii) publicly make any recommendation in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer (other than the Offer) other than a recommendation against such offer or (iv) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or propose to approve, recommend or declare advisable, or allow the Company to execute or enter into any Contract (other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal requiring, or reasonably expected to cause, the Company to abandon, terminate, delay or fail to consummate, or that would otherwise materially impede, interfere with or be inconsistent with, the Transactions.

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The literature review (see Appendix C) indicates a range of buffer width recommendations for protecting the shade function. Based on the XXXXX curve reported in this section of the report, approximately 1 SPTH (estimated at 61 meters or 200 ft) will provide nearly 100 percent effectiveness of the buffer to protect the intertidal from desiccation, elevated temperatures, and other shade-related functions. Of course, in nonforested community types (e.g., prairie and grasslands) the shade function from overstory trees may be unattainable. To maximize the buffer’s effectiveness to provide the shade function, the following actions are recommended: • Avoid disturbance to native vegetation in riparian areas, especially nearer the water’s edge. • Retain, restore, and enhance mature trees and a multi-layered canopy and understory of native vegetation at sites that support these types of plant communities. • Ensure that riparian areas can be maintained in mature, native vegetation through time. • Prevent modifications to banks and bluffs (e.g., armoring) that could disrupt natural processes (such as soil creep, development of backshore and overhanging vegetation, recruitment of wood and other organic matter to riparian area including beaches and banks.) • Prohibit cutting and topping of trees and avoid “limbing” (selective branch cutting to enhance views) of trees for view corridors and other purposes within buffers.

  • Change of Recommendation Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company’s Board of Directors may, if it concludes in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, make an Adverse Recommendation Change; provided that prior to any such Adverse Recommendation Change, (A) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub prompt written notice advising them of (x) the decision of the Company’s Board of Directors to take such action and the reasons therefor and (y) in the event the decision relates to an Alternative Transaction Proposal, a summary of the material terms and conditions of the Alternative Transaction Proposal and other information requested to be provided with respect thereto pursuant to this Section 5.4, including the information required to be provided pursuant to Section 5.4(b) and (c), (B) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub three (3) Business Days (the “Notice Period”) after delivery of each such notice to propose revisions to the terms of this Agreement (or make another proposal) and, during the Notice Period, the Company shall, and shall direct its financial advisors and outside legal advisors to, negotiate with Parent in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that, if applicable, such Alternative Transaction Proposal ceases to constitute (in the judgment of the Company’s Board of Directors, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors), a Superior Proposal or, if the Adverse Recommendation Change does not involve an Alternative Transaction Proposal, to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise not necessary, and (C) the Company’s Board of Directors shall have determined in good faith, after considering the results of such negotiations and giving effect to the proposals made by Parent and Merger Sub, if any, that such Alternative Transaction Proposal, if applicable, continues to constitute a Superior Proposal or that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise still required; provided further that, (1) if during the Notice Period described in clause (B) of this paragraph any revisions are made to the Superior Proposal, if applicable, and the Company’s Board of Directors in its good faith judgment determines (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that such revisions are material (it being understood that any change in the purchase price or form of consideration in such Superior Proposal shall be deemed a material revision), the Company shall deliver a new written notice to Parent and shall comply with the requirements of this Section 5.4(d) with respect to such new written notice except that the new Notice Period shall be two (2) Business Days instead of three (3) Business Days and (2) in the event the Company’s Board of Directors does not make the determination referred to in clause (C) of this paragraph but thereafter determines to make an Adverse Recommendation Change pursuant to this Section 5.4(d), the procedures referred to in clauses (A), (B) and (C) above shall apply anew and shall also apply to any subsequent withdrawal, amendment or change.

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1.

  • Recommendation The Sheriff recommends approval of the Board Order. The County Administrator concurs with the recommendation of the Sheriff. Should the Board of Commissioners concur with their recommendations, approval of the Board Order will implement that action. Respectfully submitted, /s/ XXXXX XXXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxx County Administrator

  • Stockholders Approval (a) Company shall, as soon as practicable following consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement, submit this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby for the approval of its stockholders at a meeting of stockholders (the "Company Stockholders Meeting", which term shall include any postponements or adjournments of such meeting). Unless otherwise required under the applicable fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors of Company, as determined by such directors in good faith after consultation with and based upon the opinion of outside legal counsel, Company shall (i) recommend adoption of this Agreement and approval of the Merger by the stockholders of Company and include in the Proxy Statement such recommendation and (ii) use all reasonable best efforts to solicit from its respective stockholders proxies in favor of adoption of this Agreement and approval of the Merger and shall take all other action necessary or advisable to secure the vote or consent of stockholders to obtain such approvals (the "Company Stockholder Approval"). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Company agrees that its obligations pursuant to the first sentence of this Section 4.5 shall not be affected by (i) the commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or communication to Company of any Acquisition Proposal (as defined in Section 4.8) or (ii) the withdrawal or modification by the Board of Directors of the Company of its approval or recommendation of this Agreement or the Merger. The Company Stockholders Meeting shall be held as soon as practicable following consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement. To the extent permitted by law, Childs, Acquiror Parent and Acquiror each agree to vote all shares of Company Common Stock beneficially owned by them in favor of the Merger.

  • Recommendations This matter has been reviewed and approved by the Medical School Conflict of Interest Board. In light of this disclosure and our finding that the Agreement was negotiated in conformance with standard University practices, I recommend that the Board of Regents approve the University’s entering into this Agreement with The Hope Foundation. Respectfully submitted, X. Xxxx Xx

  • Stockholder Meetings If authorized by the Board in its sole discretion, and subject to such guidelines and procedures as the Board may adopt, stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting and proxy holders not physically present at a meeting of stockholders may, by means of remote communication:

  • No Change in Recommendation or Alternative Acquisition Agreement Neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.