NEXT STEPS. If you disagree with my findings you may request a hearing to appeal the decision by contacting me using the details provided. If you would like to discuss your application or if there is any confusion on how to proceed, you can write to, e-mail or telephone me. My contact details are shown at the top of this letter. Failure to Respond If you fail to respond by the date given above, your application will be refused under Section 3A(4) of the Registered Designs Act 1949.
NEXT STEPS. 1. Review this information with appropriate staff.
NEXT STEPS. Upon approval of this recommendation, the program timeline will be followed (Attachment III). ATTACHMENTS and APPENDICES ATTACHMENT I Comparison by Year of Successful Teacher Certificated Applicants ATTACHMENT II Professional Improvement Program History ATTACHMENT III 2019-2020 Professional Improvement Program Timeline ATTACHMENT IV Selection of Reflective Statements: Benefits of Program Participation AA:sh ATTACHMENT I PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUCCESSFUL APPLICANTS BY YEAR YEAR TOTAL NUMBER OF APPLICANTS NUMBER SUCCESSFUL 2009-2010 64 64 2010-2011 60 58 2011-2012 87 84 2012-2013 71 70 2013-2014 86 75 2014-2015 70 68 2015-2016 72 71 2016-2017 95 90 2017-2018 103 99 2018-2019 137 104 ATTACHMENT II PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HISTORY YEAR FUND MAXIMUM AS PER CLAUSE 23.7 APPROVED ALLOCATION % OF MAXIMUM APPROVED TOTAL LEAVE FTE ACTUAL $ GRANTED FOR LEAVES ACTUAL $ GRANTED FOR TUITION TOTAL ACTUAL $ GRANTED FOR LEAVES & TUITION 2008-2009 2,392,026 1,300,000 54% 11.67 763,271 274,958 1,038,229 2009-2010 2,504,746 1,300,000 52% 6.54 382,159 349,969 732,128 2010-2011 2,774,936 1,200,000 43% 12.19 756,640 306,366 1,063,006 2011-2012 2,899,830 1,200,000 41% 15.65 768,459 316,283 1,084,742 2012-2013 3,005,090 1,200,000 40% 12.48 785,786 296,530 1,082,316 2013-2014 3,062,822 1,200,000 39% 11.56 706,110 354,758 1,060,868 2014-2015 3,019,266 1,000,000 33% 7.20 517,762 367,680 885,442 2015-2016 3,111,487 1,000,000 32% 8.026 561,457 400,757 962,214 2016-2017 3,286,102 1,000,000 30% 9.40 577,248 371,809 949,057 2017-2018 3,402,751 1,100,000 32% 7.818 521,808 545,100 1,066,908 2018-2019 3,587,437 1,200,000 33% 8.09 589,115 581,762 1,170,877 2019-2020 PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIMELINE Activity Date Clause 23 Professional Improvement Program and application package are communicated to District teachers and made available online October 26 Information meetings for interested staff (4:15 - 6:00 p.m. Conference Centre, Centre for Education) November 19, 29 Obtain data to calculate maximums as per Clause 23.5 of Teachers’ contract November 30 Due date for applications January 11 Processing of applications • Receipt of applications confirmed • Background information compiled (previous leaves, degrees, grid placement, years of service, summary of request, projected costs) • Applications prepared for review by committee of leadership staff January 14 – February 1 Review of applications • Application packages prepared for committee review • Committee workshop co...
NEXT STEPS. Disclosure information
NEXT STEPS. If you can you: • identify appropriate product groups across your CCA target unit and their base year and target period production volumes, and • derive the base year energy use of each product group, then you should investigate whether it would be more appropriate for your company to have a NOVEM CCA target. We have provided a NOVEM calculation spreadsheet template to enable companies to identify if they would be ‘better off’. The spreadsheet asks for information about your current CCA, and a rough estimation of the information needed to switch to a NOVEM target and forecasts the next target period performance with and without a NOVEM target. If switching to a NOVEM target is appropriate then an application must be prepared and submitted to make the change formally (this is discussed overleaf).
NEXT STEPS. The CLIENT acknowledges receipt of the PLANNER’s Next Steps document.
NEXT STEPS. The BCTEA Parties will proceed with the 2022/23 Joint Transportation Plan submission process, review of Joint Plans and approvals. The Parties are planning a transportation evaluation in 2022 to assess whether the strategy has effectively addressed transportation issues for First Nation students attending BC public schools and, where necessary, identify and implement improvements and/or further options. APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS The following definitions from the BCTEA support common interpretation of transportation-related Q&As:
NEXT STEPS. Does Not Meet Meets Xxxxxxxx for PGO next YES NO OVERALL Standard Standard school year RATING My signature below indicates that I have seen this evaluation. It does not necessarily indicate agreement with the findings. Date Counselor Exhibit E-3 RSD Evaluation Report – OT/PT Evaluation Report Occupational & Physical Therapist Name School Date Type of Evaluation Annual 90-day Other Comments must be made in each category. If an employee does not meet standard, justification will be included in the comment section.
NEXT STEPS. If you disagree with my findings you may request a hearing to appeal the decision by contacting me using the details provided. If you would like to discuss your application or if there is any confusion on how to proceed, you can write to, e-mail or telephone me. My contact details are shown at the top of this letter.
NEXT STEPS. Following City Council’s approval, the Office of the City Solicitor will be requested to develop the agreements, to be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk. Administration will proceed to implement the agreements based on the terms and conditions noted. REPORT APPROVAL Written by: Xxxx Xxxxx, Recreation Programs & Facilities Manager Reviewed by: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Director of Recreation and Community Development Approved by: Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, General Manager, Community Services
