Child Support Payments. Child Support payments for the Children Outside the Couple shall be made by the ☐ Husband ☐ Wife to the ☐ Husband ☐ Wife in payments of $ due each month commencing on the 1st of the month following a petition for Divorce being filed in the jurisdiction of Governing Law (“Child Support”). Child Support shall continue until the first of the following events:
Child Support Payments. Child Support payments for the Children Outside the Couple shall be made by the ☐ Husband ☐ Wife to the ☐ Husband ☐ Wife in payments of $__________________ due each month commencing on the 1st of the month following a petition for Divorce being filed in the State of Governing Law (“Child Support”). Child Support shall continue until the first of the following events: Any child attains age 19, or has attained age 18 and either is not a full-time high school student or is self-supporting; Any child dies; Any child enters into a valid marriage, is on active duty with any of the armed forces of the United States of America, receives a declaration of emancipation under State law, or otherwise becomes emancipated by leaving home and becoming self-supporting; Any custodial parent dies and the other parent assumes custody of the child; or By court order.
Child Support Payments. Select the third statement from this article if one of the Spouses must submit support payments to the other to contribute to their Children’s wellbeing and care. Additionally, the “Husband” and “Wife” checkboxes presented in this definition must be used to establish who the Paying Spouse and who the Receiving Spouse of the Child Support Payments will be. (62) Child Support Payment Schedule. This attachment will need to define any and all support payments one Spouse must deliver to the Other for the care of the Couple’s Children. Begin by recording the monthly amount that must be paid, continue with an entry of the two-digit day of the month when Child Support Payments must be received, then conclude this statement by documenting the calendar date when the first Child Support Payment must be received. VIII. Additional Support (63) No Additional Support. There may be expenses outside of simply maintaining a Child’s day-to-day care. If the previous article fully defines the status of support payments made from one Spouse to another for the purpose of caring for the Couple’s Children and no additional payments will be required for this goal, then select the first checkbox statement of Article VIII. (64)
Child Support Payments. By signing the Contract, the Contractor certifies, as of the date of signing the Contract, that the Contractor (a) is not under an obligation to pay child support; or (b) is under such an obligation and is in good standing with respect to that obligation; or (c) has agreed to a payment plan with the Vermont Office of Child Support Services and is in full compliance with that plan. If the Contractor is a sole proprietorship, the Contractor’s statement applies only to the proprietor. If the Contractor is a partnership, the Contractor’s statement applies to all general partners with a permanent residence in Vermont. If the Contractor is a corporation, this provision does not apply.
Child Support Payments. The Performing Party is neither an individual nor a business organization with an ownership interest of at least 25% by an individual who is in arrears on child support payments. Under Texas Family Code Section 231.006 (relating to child support), the Performing Party certifies that the individual or business entity named in this contract is not ineligible to receive the specified grant and acknowledges that this contract may be terminated and payment may be withheld if this certification is inaccurate. If the Performing Party is subject to § 231.006, prior to signing this Contract, Performing Party must provide TCEQ the names and Social Security numbers of each person with at least 25% ownership of the Performing Party.
Child Support Payments. Under Section 231.006, Texas Family Code, relating to child support obligations, the Grantee and any other individual or business entity named in this agreement, contract or application is not ineligible to receive the specified agreement, loan, grant award or payment and acknowledges that this agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is Attachment D.2.
Child Support Payments. ± Grant Recipient represents and warrants that it will included the following clause in the award documents for every subaward and subcontract and will require subrecipients and subcontractors to certify accordingly: ³Under Section 231.006 of the Family Code, the vendor or applicant certifies that the individual or business entity named in this contract, bid or application is not ineligible to receive the specified grant, loan, or payment and acknowledges that this contract may be terminated and payment may be withheld if this certification is inaccurate. A bid or an application for a contract, grant, or loan paid from state funds must include the name and social security number of the individual or sole proprietor and each partner, shareholder, or owner with an ownership interest of at least 25 percent of the business entity submitting the bid or application.´
Child Support Payments. Income Imputation, and the Low-Income Guidelines This task uses data from the Wisconsin Court Record to explore the extent to which child support payments are related to several characteristics of child support orders, including (a) whether the order was set by default, (b) whether the order was based on imputed or actual income, and (c) whether the regular guidelines, the low-income adaptation of the guidelines, or neither was used to set the orders. The court record contains relatively complete information on whether income was imputed; information on default orders and the type of guideline used is less complete. We conduct both descriptive and multivariate analyses. We anticipate using propensity score matching techniques to increase the comparability of various types of cases. Most of the focus of this task will be on cases in which the low-income adaptation could have been used (e.g., noncustodial parents whose income is less than 150% of the federal poverty guidelines. This task complements task 4, which is focused on the low-income guidelines (but does not include payment information), and task 6, which is related to income imputation, but is focused on methods of imputation rather than the relationship between imputation and payments. Deliverable: A report with these findings will be completed by August 2019.
Child Support Payments. If the above choices do not adequately define what the Couple wishes to agree to, then locate the “Other” option and deliver this report directly to the available area. (25)
Child Support Payments. Full Sample Milwaukee County Cohort 2 DDD Multiple Regression Propensity Score Matching (PSM) Any Payment in First Year after Release Milwaukee Cohort Two (DDD) or Participation in Milwaukee Prison Project (Multiple Regression and PSM) 1.58 ** 0.91 -0.01 Incarceration Length 1.04 ** 1.08 * Two Prison Spells 0.97 0.94 Up to One Year of Post-Release Supervision 1.32 ** 1.47 One to Two Years of Post-Release Supervision 1.88 *** 2.43 *** Any Payment in Second Year after Release Milwaukee Cohort Two (DDD) or Participation in Milwaukee Prison Project (Multiple Regression and PSM) 1.26 0.95 0.01 Incarceration Length 1.04 ** 1.23 *** Two Prison Spells 0.80 ** 0.90 Up to One Year of Post-Release Supervision 1.22 1.47 One to Two Years of Post-Release Supervision 1.68 *** 1.92 ** Amount Paid in First Year after Release Milwaukee Cohort Two (DDD) or Participation in Milwaukee Prison Project (Multiple Regression and PSM) $81 -$49 $9 Incarceration Length 6 62 Two Prison Spells -38 79 Up to One Year of Post-Release Supervision 283 *** 13 One to Two Years of Post-Release Supervision 679 *** 521 *** Amount Paid in Second Year after Release Milwaukee Cohort Two (DDD) or Participation in Milwaukee Prison Project (Multiple Regression and PSM) -$84 -$5 $122 Two Prison Spells -368 *** 51 Up to One Year of Post-Release Supervision 237 ** -49 One to Two Years of Post-Release Supervision 600 *** 364 * N 10,044 1,520 1,520 * p < .10; ** p<.05; *** p<.01. However, our regression results indicate that actual participation in the Milwaukee Prison Project (not just eligibility) is not associated with individual payment behavior, either in terms of making any payments or amounts of payments; none of the coefficients are statistically significant. When we consider the role of criminal justice experiences on support payments, post- release supervision (such as parole or work release) emerges as an important explanatory variable in both the DDD analysis and the regression analysis. We controlled for the length of post-release supervision in the models for both the first year after release and for the second year after release. Recognizing that future (year two) correction supervision may affect current (year one) payment behavior, we extended our supervision measure out multiple years. Our results support this supposition. The DDD analysis results indicate that for post- release supervision in year two (compared to no supervision in that year), there is an 88 percent greater likelihood tha...
