Task 4 Sample Clauses

Task 4. Design and Facilitate Peer-to-Peer Web-Based Distance Learning Events: $21,000 (Minimum of 1 kick-off event and 3 web-based learning events) One kick-off web event to orient participating communities Within 30 days of contract execution Agendas for each web-based learning event (draft and final) Draft: 30 days prior to each event date Final: 20 days prior to each event date Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Complete materials set for each web- based learning event (draft and final) Draft: 10 days prior to each event date Final: 5 days prior to each event date Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 At least three web-based learning events Date of event Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Summary reports evaluating each web- based learning event Within 15 days of event Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Task 5: Provide Community Facilitation for Each Participating Community Team: $70,000 Summary of key goals and objectives, and high-level timeline and reporting mechanisms to track progress for each participating community July 15, 2016 Provide community facilitation services Ongoing Monthly reports to the State on facilitation activities and community progress Monthly until March 31, 2017 Task 6: Develop a Final Report: $24,000 Final report (draft and final) Draft: 45 days prior to March 31, 2017 Final: 7 days prior to March 31, 2017 Final high-level curriculum 7 days prior to Xxxxx 00, 0000 Xxxx 7: Ongoing Reporting: $5,000 Monthly progress reports (submitted with invoices) Monthly to March 31, 2017 INVOICE TOTAL Remittance Address: Xxxx to Address: Xxxxx Xxxxx Department of Vermont Health Access (DVHA) NOB 1 South, 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 XxxxxXxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx DVHA BO USE: *INVOICE PAYMENTS ARE NET30 TERMS, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. STATE OF VERMONT, CONTRACT FOR SERVICES PAGE 17 OF 17 DEPARTMENT OF VERMONT HEALTH ACCESS CONTRACT #31145 PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE AMENDMENT 2 This amendment consists of 16 pages. Except as modified by this amendment and any previous amendments, all provisions of this contract, #31145, dated April 1, 2016 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Task 4. 3: Prepare Tracings & Bidding Documents Upon completion of over-the-shoulder review and final approval of the Final Plans, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCYthe final tracings plan submission in 22” x 34” format, contract documents for bidding. Assumptions: • Only three (3) plan submittals will be made to LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY: Preliminary Plans, Final Plans, Final Tracings and they will be made with the Road/Pavement set of plans. • Over-the-shoulder reviews will be completed by the LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY to accelerate review and revisions. • Conduit, handholes, pedestals, poles, cabinets are anticipated. • Connection is expected at IoT lab. • Existing drainage system will be retained and re-used. • Modular add-on of proprietary technology components may require additional design scope or fee. • Utility conflicts will be avoided, and no utility relocation will be required. • Any utility potholing will be completed by LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY. Items Specifically Not Included: • Final Field Check Meeting. • Subsurface Utility Engineering (XXX) to determine existing utility locations at a quality level A, which would include test holes to determine horizontal and vertical location of utilities. • In-pavement charging technology equipment. • In-pavement materials performance monitoring equipment.
Task 4. Re-Evaluation Our team is aware of the many additional activities that may arise from the Environmental Review Process. In addition to these identified activities, sometimes new circumstances may be made known during site construction activities. In these instances, MPACT will assess the changes and will utilize HUD Environmental Regulations at §58.47 to re-evaluate the original environmental findings and coordinate any additional need for republication and/or further consultation with appropriate regulatory agencies. Most importantly, any identified environmental concerns that are identified will be forwarded to appropriate Fort Bend County staff to assure that potential mitigation requirements are incorporated into the construction build plans.
Task 4. The contractor shall ensure that all eligibility requirements have been met by the applicant prior to evaluation. Evaluation of each application should be based on all available evidence of merit, including, but not limited to: Graduate Record Examinations (GRE), undergraduate transcripts, personal statements, and reference evaluation forms. Applications that are incomplete and/or do not meet minimum eligibility requirements should not be made available to panel members for evaluation. The contractor shall successfully solicit the willing participation of high caliber evaluators from academia, government (DoD and other federal agencies), and industry who have doctoral degrees from the science and engineering disciplines (S&E). The contractor shall make all reasonable efforts to ensure that evaluation panels include a minimum of three (3) DoD (AF, Army, & Navy) S&Es per research discipline area. Selection of qualified evaluators is a vital component in the successful operation of the program. While the ARL relies on the contractor to identify and convene appropriate panels of technical experts, the agencies reserve the right to review and approve recommended panelists. The contractor shall arrange and coordinate discipline-specific panel meetings to review and evaluate applications. After a rank order listing of the applicants is submitted per discipline, ARL will make final selections for bestowal of Student recipient awards.
Task 4. Setting up a Help Centre & Deployment of Manpower
Task 4. Provide Data Analysis & Dashboards. Consultant will perform data analysis and develop integrated dashboards using ArcGIS Online and business analytics platform. This task may include, without limitation, the following work:
Task 4. Quality Assurance (QA)‌ In general, the Quality Assurance Task focuses on the Project’s quality management of its processes. Through such Task the QMS Consultant should provide overall Project quality review; periodically examine Quality Control review results, Quality Checklists, change requests and tracking; and summarize the results of such review and analysis for executive review and oversight throughout the life of the Project. For this purpose, the OSCIO will obligate Authorized Purchasers to require the QMS Consultant to create and deliver quarterly Quality Assurance Status and Improvements Reports and Presentations summarizing the overall Project status, performance, risks and recommendations for process improvement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Task 4. Software development (implementation of change requests and development, technical support to stakeholders for new connections and any ad-hoc corrective software maintenance resulting from the above 21
Task 4. 2 – Public Meetings. Consultant will prepare or assist in the preparation of draft staff reports, exhibits, and presentations to Planning Commission and City Council. Consultant’s project manager and task leads will be prepared to attend, in total, a minimum of three (3) public hearings held by the Planning Commission and/or City Council.
Task 4. 5.4 In vivo genotoxicity of MNM. Task has been integrated into task 4.5.5.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.