Administrative Evaluations Clause Samples
The Administrative Evaluations clause establishes procedures for reviewing and assessing the performance or compliance of a party with administrative requirements under an agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria, frequency, and methods for conducting such evaluations, which may include audits, progress reports, or compliance checks. Its core function is to ensure ongoing oversight and accountability, helping to identify and address issues early and maintain standards throughout the contractual relationship.
Administrative Evaluations. Administrative evaluations conducted by the supervising administrator or their designee will be conducted every three years. Written comments will be shared with the professor within 30 working days of the initial observation.
Administrative Evaluations. In addition to the above-described procedures, other evaluations may be initiated by the responsible ▇▇▇▇/Area Manager at any time. These administrative evaluations may include, but are not limited to classroom/worksite observations, student evaluations, student interviews, and other evaluative techniques.
Administrative Evaluations a. Probationary Employees will be evaluated in writing once during each semester by the Chief Academic Officer.
b. The evaluation will be conducted openly and only with the knowledge of the Employee. An administrative evaluation will be based on direct observation of Employee and student interaction in the classroom, laboratory, services and other assigned duties of the Employee. Course syllabi, examinations, quizzes and other appropriate materials used in performance of the Employee’s assignment, including participation in committee meetings, curriculum development, student advising, and when relevant academic counseling, may be reviewed in the process based on predetermined criteria for review in Appendix AR, Administrative Review/Conference.
c. A written administrative report in the form of a completed Appendix AR shall describe the Employee’s strengths and areas for growth within two (2) weeks following each evaluation. The Employee will be given a copy of the report for review and opportunity to discuss the report with the Chief Academic Officer. Faculty Council representatives may be present at this meeting if the Employee chooses. Each administrative report will be signed and dated by the Employee indicating that he/she has read the report; it does not indicate concurrence with the report or its conclusions or recommendations. The filed report shall not contain material not previously discussed with the Employee.
d. An Employee has the right to attach a written reply to the administrative report. Evaluation proceedings, resultant observations, reports and any Employee response will be retained in the Employee’s personnel file and will be disclosed to third parties only as permitted or required by law unless the affected Employee chooses to disclose the results to others.
Administrative Evaluations. The Superintendent is charged with the responsibility for developing and implementing a method of evaluating all Administrators, not less than annually. The Superintendent shall designate those Administrators who shall be responsible for the evaluation of those who report to them. Evaluations shall, at a minimum, measure the Administrator’s performance and/or job goals, which are developed jointly by the Administrator and his/her evaluator.
Administrative Evaluations. Evaluations of A.P.S.A. members shall be made in accordance with Board pol- icy and administrative procedures.
Administrative Evaluations. If a personnel decision involves two or more employees and all other factors distinguishing them from other are equal, then length of service MAY be considered as a tie-breaker
Administrative Evaluations. An effective working relationship between the Governing Body and the Head Administrator is essential to the successful operation of the school. The development and maintenance of such relationship will be assisted by annual performance reviews. The Head Administrators contract and SPLC Performance Framework, per NMSA § 22-8B-9.1, will be used to evaluate the overall performance.
Administrative Evaluations. The teachers of the District shall have the opportunity to give feedback to the Superintendent about their school Administrator(s) in written form in the following way:
9.2.1 A “Teacher Feedback Survey” facilitated by the Human Resources Department. The intent of this survey is to meet our statutory parameters related to the evaluation of Principals and to provide valuable feedback to Principals from their staff regarding his/her performance. This survey will be completed in February/March of each year, will be anonymous, will align with the State Evaluation System for Principals, and will be reviewed based on any updates/changes in State Statute.
Administrative Evaluations. (1) The appropriate supervising administrator shall conduct an evaluation of each tenured faculty member in writing every year (note possible exception for Distinguished Professor in 9.3.C.). This evaluation shall include a classroom observation (performed at least once every three years), a response to the faculty member's self-evaluation and any supporting materials attached, a response to the faculty member's goals for the following academic year, a review of the student evaluations, when administered as per 9.3.B. and an overall summary of the faculty member's performance.
(2) The period under review shall be the preceding academic year (SU, FA and SP terms).
(3) The classroom observation shall be conducted on a date, class and timeframe agreed to by the faculty member and supervising administrator. Unless otherwise agreed to by the faculty member and the supervising administrator, the faculty member will receive formal feedback within 14 calendar days of the observation.
(4) Upon the request of a faculty member, a peer review may be substituted for the classroom observation. Such peer review shall be conducted by another tenured faculty member selected by the faculty member being evaluated. The peer observation shall be conducted, documented, and entered into the faculty member's overall administrative evaluation without prejudice.
(5) In the event a pending grievance or other legal proceeding relates to an observation of a faculty member, then the faculty member may request that an alternative administrator conduct subsequent observations until such time as the grievance or legal proceeding is resolved. The alternative administrator shall be selected by mutual agreement of the faculty member and the Personnel Administrator.
Administrative Evaluations. The College shall conduct evaluations of distance education courses in accordance with Article VII of the Faculty Association contract. It is understood that "classroom observations" may be conducted by the appropriate administrator(s) by logging into Internet or Online courses. The College administrator conducting the classroom observation shall provide the faculty member with the advanced notice of the observation in accordance with Article VII, C.2, of the Faculty Association contract. The administrator shall have access to course material or communications transmitted via the Internet and any other material distributed to students. The College will publish an appropriate advisory notifying students that their Internet communications are subject to monitoring by the administration. Should the College conduct a "classroom observation" of an Online course, a written report will be produced in accordance with Article VII, Section C, of the Faculty Association contract.