Xxxxx and Messrs Sample Clauses

Xxxxx and Messrs. Xxx Xxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx (Chief Executive Officer), Xxxx Xxxx Xxx and Xxx Xxx Xxx, Xxxxxx; two Non-executive Directors, namely Madam U Po Chu and Xx. Xxxxxx X. Yan; and four
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxxxx and Messrs. Lxxxxxxxx and Small: Purchaser hereby requests an extension of the Approval Period, as such term is defined in Section 17(A) of the Agreement, from August 19, 1996 until 5:00 p.m. CDT on August 26, 1996. Please acknowledge Seller's acceptance of this modification to the Agreement by executing this letter in the space provided below and returning it via facsimile mail to Purchaser. ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois limited partnership By: Equity Residential Properties Trust, a Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust, its general partner By: /s/ Lxxxx X. Xxxxxx -------------------------------- Lxxxx X. Xxxxxx Assistant Vice President Approved and Accepted this day of August, 1996 SONG I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois limited partnership By: Song I of Illinois, Inc., an Illinois corporation, its general partner By: /s/ Jxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------ Name: Jxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------ Title: Authorized Representative ------------------------------------ August 20, 1996 Song I Limited Partnership The Balcor Company Dxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Esq. c/o The Balcor Company 2000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx & Zxxxx 2000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx X000 Xxxxx 0000 Xxxxx X000 Xxxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 500 X. Xxxxxx Street Bannockburn, IL 60015 Attn: Ax Xxxxxxxxx Cxxxxxx, XX 00000 Attn: Ixxxx Xxxxx Re: Agreement of Sale, dated as of the 19th day of July, 1996 (the "Agreement") between Song I Limited Partnership, as Seller, and ERP Operating Limited Partnership, as Purchaser, for the purchase of Songbird Apartments, San Antonio, Texas (the "Property").
Sample 1
Xxxxx and Messrs. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxxxxxx The Claimant alleges that, in July 2023, there were several attempts by “persons unknown” to access the Microsoft Accounts of Xx. Xxxxx and Messrs. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxxxxxx (“Counsel”).160 The Claimant asserts that all Counsel received notifications from Microsoft nearly at the same time, each indicating a request for a “single-use code”, despite none of the Counsel having made such a request and having seldom, if ever, previously received such notifications.161 157 R-18, Letter from Xx Xxxxxx to the Respondent, 19 April 2023; R-19, Letter from Xx Xxxxxx to the Respondent, 8 May 2023. 158 See generally Xxxxxx XX. 159 R-18, Letter from Xx Xxxxxx to the Respondent, 19 April 2023. 160 IMA, ¶ 64. 161 IMA, ¶ 136; IMA Reply, ¶ 20. See also witness statements and evidence referred to at IMA, ¶ 64. According to the Claimant, the receipt of single-use codes indicates that “someone” has attempted to access the corresponding Microsoft account.162 Therefore, referring to the Timor-Leste case,163 the Claimant submits “that the communications of its representative and those assisting its representative […] may be [being] monitored by Australian intelligence agencies”,164 which if so would irreparably prejudice the Claimant’s due process rights and the integrity of the proceedings.165 The record shows that Xx. Xxxxx received a single-use code notification on 9, 16, and 22 July 2023 from “xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx”.166 Each time the signatory was identified as “The Microsoft account team”.167 Xx. Xxxxx’x Microsoft Security Page also indicates that, on 25 July 2023, an “[u]nsuccessful sync” with her account took place from Poland as an “approximate location”, despite her being in Australia at the time.168 In turn, in their witness statements, Messrs. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx affirm having received single-use code notices from Microsoft also in July 2023.169 Similarly, an email from Mr. Sophocles to Xx. Xxxxxx shows that, on 21 July 2023, the former too received a single-use code notification from the same sender as Xx. Xxxxx, and equally signed by “The Microsoft account team”.170 As a threshold point, the Tribunal recalls that whatever conduct Australia may or may not have displayed in the context of the Timor-Leste case appears to say little to nothing about the Respondent’s conduct in the instant case.171 However, having no reason to doubt Messrs. Xxxxxx’x and Xxxxxxxx’x statements that they received single...
Sample 1
Xxxxx and Messrs. Xxxxx and Xxxxx, who represent half of the membership of the Novavax Board of Directors, are affiliates of IGI. The Certificate of Incorporation contains certain provisions permitted under the General Corporation Law of Delaware relating to the liability of directors. The provisions eliminate a director's liability for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty, except in certain circumstances involving wrongful acts, such as the breach of a director's duty of loyalty or acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing 58
Sample 1
Xxxxx and Messrs. Orr, Chandler, Copeland, Watjen, and Crispin and may include certain other officers of the Surviving Corporation
Sample 1
Xxxxx and Messrs. Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx-xx Xxx and Xxxxxxx Xxxx, for the respondents. B e n n e t and H a r r ie s ,, JJ. ; — This is a first appeal by the Secretary of State for India in Council against a- decree of the Allahabad Improvement T rust T ribunal. T h e Tribunal had an application before them against the award of the then acquisition officer for compensa­ tion for certain premises. T h e amount of comj)ens3- tion was increased by the T ribunal by Rs.4,600. T h e objection which has been taken is that the T ribunal was not properly constituted during the course of the trial of the case and therefore its award was without jurisdic­ tion. T he order sheet for the 25th August, 1932, one- of the dates of the hearing, states that two members o f the Tribunal, out of three, w^ere present and one member Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxx was absent on that date. T h e Government Xxxxxxx took an objection that the case should not be taken up as one of the assessors was 'ibsent. T h e two members present, however, decided to proceed with the hearing of witnesses and on that date three witnesses ■were heard, one on behalf of the plaintiif and two on behalf of the defendant. On a latei' date the three members of the Tribunal were present and the case was argued and a judgment was given in w4 iich the three m em bers of the Tribunal agreed. T he point, before us is whether the trial was one within the jurisdic­ tion of the court below when the court acted contrary to the provisions of the Act on a certain date. The: provisions of the U. P. Town Improvement Act., A ct V III of 19 rg, are particularly clear on the point. For a. V O L . L V IIl] A LL A H A B A D S E R IE S IO 8 1 compulsory acquisition there are several sections begin- ning with section 56. In section 57 it is provideci that ‘‘A 7 'ribiinal shall be constituted, as provided in section roKlm>li' 59, tor the purpose of performing the functions oF the court in reference to the acquisition of latid for the Trust, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894/’ In section 59 it is laid down that the T ribunal shall consist of a President and two assessors- In sub-section (6) it is provided: “ W hen any person ceases for any reason to be a member of the T ribim al, or when any member is tem­ porarily absent in consequence of illness or any unavoid­ able cause, the authority which appointed him shall forthwith appoint a fit person to be a member iu his place.” Therefore the A ct contemplates that when one member becomes unavoidably absent...
Sample 1

Related to Xxxxx and Messrs

  • Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act There is and has been no failure on the part of the Company or any of the Company’s directors or officers, in their capacities as such, to comply with any provision of the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated in connection therewith (the “Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act”), including Section 402 related to loans and Sections 302 and 906 related to certifications.

  • Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act There is and has been no failure on the part of the Company or any of the Company’s directors or officers, in their capacities as such, to comply with any provision of the Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated in connection therewith (the “Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act”), including Section 402 related to loans and Sections 302 and 906 related to certifications.

  • Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxxxxx “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or Subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

  • Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx/Market Abuse Laws You acknowledge that, depending on your country or broker’s country, or the country in which Common Stock is listed, you may be subject to xxxxxxx xxxxxxx restrictions and/or market abuse laws in applicable jurisdictions, which may affect your ability to accept, acquire, sell or attempt to sell, or otherwise dispose of the shares of Common Stock, rights to shares of Common Stock (e.g., RSUs) or rights linked to the value of Common Stock, during such times as you are considered to have “inside information” regarding the Company (as defined by the laws or regulations in applicable jurisdictions, including the United States and your country). Local xxxxxxx xxxxxxx laws and regulations may prohibit the cancellation or amendment of orders you placed before possessing inside information. Furthermore, you may be prohibited from (i) disclosing insider information to any third party, including fellow employees and (ii) “tipping” third parties or causing them to otherwise buy or sell securities. Any restrictions under these laws or regulations are separate from and in addition to any restrictions that may be imposed under any applicable Company xxxxxxx xxxxxxx policy. You acknowledge that it is your responsibility to comply with any applicable restrictions, and you should speak to your personal advisor on this matter.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.