The Respondent Sample Clauses

The Respondent has cooperated fully with Staff during the course of the investigation, and by agreeing to this settlement, has avoided the need for a contested hearing on the merits. V. CONTRAVENTIONS

The Respondent. The Respondent requests that the Tribunal render an award as follows:

The Respondent. 29. The Respondent filed the following prayers for relief: 1. to reject all the requests and claims of the Appellant, 2. to confirm the decision of the Single Judge of the FIFA Players’ Status Committee on 22.04.2015, 3. to order the costs of the arbitration to be borne by ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ SFC, 4. to order ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ SFC to pay all the legal costs of the Trabzonspor A.Ş in connection with this arbitration”. 30. The Respondent’s submissions, in essence, may be summarized as follows: - According to the jurisprudence of the CAS (e.g. 2012/A/2707), there is no legal obstacle which prevents the clubs from agreeing that the new club, apart from paying the transfer fee, additionally bears the solidarity contribution. Therefore, the Agreement shall be considered valid. - The Agreement clearly states that the payment is a “net” payment. Furthermore, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ is an experienced club regarding international transfers and shall be considered sufficiently professional to negotiate a transfer fee. - The principle of “in dubio contra stipulatorem” will only apply if a contract is not clearly drafted. In the case at hand the clause regarding the transfer fee does not leave any room for interpretation, the principle of “in dubio contra stipulatorem” should not apply. - With respect to the payment in the amount of EUR 500,000 and EUR 50,000 per month, the Respondent pointed out that, by rejecting its claim for payment in the amount of EUR 50,000 per month, the penalty aspect of the fee has already been reduced in the Appealed Decision.

The Respondent s Lucky Play logo which brands all the Respondent’s promotional material has the same colour scheme as the Supreme Ventures logo used by the Applicant in its marketing of Cash Pot;

The Respondent. The Republic of Sylvania is Member of the UN, WTO, and ICSID and is party to numerous treaties and conventions. It entered into a Bilateral Investment Treaty with the Republic of Freedonia.4

The Respondent has also relied upon the following Clause of “Tariff Order for Procurement of Power from Wind Electric Generator 2016”:

The Respondent. Since January 2014, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ has been an IIROC Registrant and a Portfolio Manager with Cumberland Wealth Management Inc. (“Cumberland”), an IIROC Dealer Member Firm.

The Respondent. IG is registered in Ontario and Manitoba as an investment counsel and portfolio manager and is responsible for the management of in excess of 140 mutual funds (“IG Funds”) with assets under management of approximately $42.5 billion (as of June 30, 2004). The distributor of IG Funds is Investor Group Financial Services Inc., except in Quebec where the distributor is Les Services Investors Limitée, (collectively, the “Distributor”). IG and the Distributor are affiliated through their common ownership by Investors Group Inc., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of IGM Financial Inc. (“IGMFI”). The shares of IGMFI are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “IGI”. The companies comprising Investors Group have an integrated management structure and many of the sales, compliance, and operational staff provide services to both IG and the Distributor. In this Settlement Agreement, “Investors Group” means, collectively, IGMFI, IG and the Distributor.

The Respondent. In its letter of 10 June 2024, the Respondent wrote that “an indefinite suspension of the proceedings would not be appropriate and the Tribunal should instead issue an order terminating the arbitration” pursuant to Article 41(4) of the 1976 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.