WILDLIFE PROTECTION. 1. The Purchaser is authorized to enter areas closed by gates, barricades or berms with motorized vehicles only for the purposes related to the performance of this contract. Motorized vehicle entry for purposes other than contract performance, such as hunting or transporting game animals will be considered trespass and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law (Montana Code Annotated § 45-6-203).
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. Wildlife management practices, including removal of non-native species and the restoration of extirpated native species, are in accordance with NPS legislation, the Code of Federal Regulations, and NPS Policies (NPS Management Policies 2006). Native predators, scavengers and prey are all integral to healthy native ecosystems and are protected by NPS Management Policies. The occasional damage that is caused by wildlife, to fences, ranching structures, agricultural animals and livestock forage, is to be expected on permitted lands. Lessee shall not engage in any activity that causes harm or destroys any wildlife. Conversely, Lessee shall not engage in any activity that purposely supports or increases populations of non-native or invasive animal species. On a case by case basis, the Lessor will evaluate incidences of depredation and choose a course of action. The nature of the course of action taken, if any, will be determined by the wildlife species, the extent and frequency of the damage and Reserve-wide management objectives. The use of noise making devices, such as “corn cannons” shall not be permitted as per 36 CFR 2.2(a) (2).
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. The ENGINEER agrees to comply with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as listed in 50 C.F.R. § 17.11 and 50 C.F.R. Part 402; the Lacey Act (16 U.S.C.A. 3371-3378 et seq., as amended); the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C.A. 703-12); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C.A. 661 et seq.); Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C.A. 1653(f)); the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.A. 1251 et seq.); the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C.A. 1451); and the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.A. 300f et seq., as amended), insofar as they apply to the performance of this Agreement.
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. The officer will have 15 calendar days from the date of notification to provide written notice of acceptance or rejection of the transfer/demotion offer. Upon acceptance or at the expiration of the 15 calendar day consideration period, the transfer/demotion becomes non- revocable by the officer. Officers who accept transfer/demotion utilizing this bidding process may not express interest in another vacant district for two (2) years from the date of their transfer. Vacant districts created by an officer utilizing this seniority bidding process will be filled by the Game Commission in its sole discretion. This system of posting will only be utilized up to 15 calendar days prior to the graduation of a Cadet Class. Officers placed in Districts upon graduation from the Xxxx Xxxxxxx School of Conservation may not utilize seniority for a transfer for two (2) years after their graduation date. Such officers may express an interest in transferring, but it is the Game Commission’s discretion to allow the transfer. Management will accept electronic bids (email) for all postings covered by this Agreement.
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. 2.10 Bird nesting season: Permittee shall not allow any vegetation removal within the site from February 1s to September 1st, the recognized breeding, nesting and fledging season for most bird species. If vegetation has to be removed within these dates, a qualified biologist shall conduct bird surveys for nesting birds prior to construction. If an endangered or threatened bird species is found, a qualified biologist shall conduct 8 bird surveys, 10 days apart, in compliance with Fish and Wildlife Service protocols. If an endangered or threatened bird species, such as least Xxxx’x vireo, is found, Permittee shall not allow any activity within the site from March 15th to September 15th. If no breeding/nesting birds are observed and concurrence has been received from CDFW, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If breeding activities and/or an active bird nest is located, and concurrence has been received from CDFW, Permittee shall do one of the following to avoid and minimize impacts to nesting birds;
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. 3.20.1 The Lessee shall coordinate with those federal, State and local agencies necessary to ensure protection of fish and wildlife and their habitat within the vicinity of the Pipeline during all Pipeline Activities. The Lessee shall maintain all required authorizations from these agencies during all Pipeline Activities.
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. 6.14 Tree and Vegetation Removal
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. An initial assessment of the Indonesian parks identified priority needs in peatland hydrologic restoration and management. USAID solicited support from the U.S. Department of Interior, International Technical Assistance Program (ITAP) to partner with Indonesia‘s Ministry of Environment and Forestry to implement the five-year program. Technical assistance and training will be accomplished through natural resource assessments, training workshops, technical consulting, U.S.-based training internships, and scientific exchanges between DOI experts and Indonesian protected area staff. The idea for the partnership began to take root in February 2015, when Great Dismal Swamp hydrologist, Xxxx Xxxxxxx, participated in a training and assessment team sent to Sebangau by ITAP. The team trained Sebangau park staff on basic peatland hydrology and hydrological restoration techniques. This workshop included case studies from Great Dismal Swamp and the Everglades National Park as well as exercises in water quality sampling. The team spent a few days in the field with workshop participants to demonstrate field techniques for analyzing soil pits, assessing peat cores, and installing shallow groundwater monitoring xxxxx (Figure 3). In addition, the team took time to visit the village of Habaring Huarung, to learn about the challenges of community development in villages surrounding the park. Engaging these local communities is an essential part of the protected area management strategy at Sebangau. In late March of 2015, DOI-ITAP staff invited several Indonesian colleagues to visit the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (Figure 4). A group of nine staff from two Indonesian National Parks, including Sebangau, and senior officials from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry made the trip to Suffolk, Virginia. The group undertook three days of classroom and field based activities to learn more about Great Dismal Swamp‘s restoration efforts, which were recently profiled in The Nature Conservancy magazine (http:/xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/xxx-xxxxx-xxxxxx- swamp.xml), and earned the 2013 National Environmental Leadership Award for "Refuge of the Year". The Indonesian delegation also studied wetland management techniques at nearby protected peatlands at Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge and Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge in northeast North Carolina. When the managers realized how similar their resources and challenges were, they agreed to pursue a ―S...
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. Any harassment or destruction of wildlife will result in immediate eviction from the park.
WILDLIFE PROTECTION. In the event that listed species have been determined to be residing on, or otherwise be significantly dependent on the Subject Property, the Developer shall obtain the necessary permits from the FWC or other applicable agencies. Activities associated with listed flora and fauna shall comply with the LDC.
