Timeline for Evaluation and Reappointment Review Sample Clauses

Timeline for Evaluation and Reappointment Review. Each faculty member shall submit to the Chair, three (3) weeks after the beginning of the Fall semester, a Report of Faculty Activities applicable to their rank. The Report shall present the faculty member's activities in the areas of teaching and advising, scholarship, and service over the past academic year. While documentation of these activities is not required in the report, the faculty member is responsible for maintaining such documentation in his or her office and supplying the documentation upon request. In addition, faculty members shall submit updated current curriculum vitae to the Chair, who shall forward it to the Xxxx, VPAA, and Human Resources.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Timeline for Evaluation and Reappointment Review. Each faculty member shall submit to the Chair, three (3) weeks after the beginning of the Fall semester, a Report of Faculty Activities applicable to their rank. The Report shall present the faculty member's activities in the areas of teaching and advising, scholarship, and service over the past academic year. While documentation of these activities is not required in the report, the faculty member is responsible for maintaining such documentation in his or her office and supplying the documentation upon request. In addition, faculty members shall submit updated current curriculum vitae to the Chair, who shall forward it to the Xxxx, VPAA, and Human Resources. The faculty member, by the end of the third week of the Fall semester, will submit a Report of Activities for consideration first by the faculty peers in his or her academic unit, then by the Chair, and finally, by the Xxxx. Tenure-track faculty may decline to evaluate their peers. Tenured faculty members are required to evaluate their colleagues, except in cases of a clear conflict of interest. If a non-tenured faculty member declines to review a colleague or it is determined that a tenured faculty member has a conflict of interest, that faculty member is not to provide a review and is to abstain from any vote regarding reappointment, promotion, or tenure. Peers are to perform both a categorical and narrative evaluation of the faculty member. This means that all faculty members are required to provide written comments supporting their categorical evaluation. Peer evaluations take place between the third and fifth week of the Fall semester. At the end of the fifth week of the Fall semester the peer evaluations are forwarded to the Chair. During weeks six (6) and seven (7) of the Fall semester the Chair performs his or her evaluation. If there are wide discrepancies in the peer evaluations, the Chair will note these and describe how (if at all) these discrepancies were reflected in his or her own evaluation. By the end of week seven (7) of the Fall semester, the transcribed evaluations, including the Chair’s evaluation, shall be sent to the faculty member and discussed in a meeting with the Chair. This meeting takes place during weeks eight (8) and nine (9) of the Fall semester. By the end of week ten (10), the faculty member submits to the Chair any material he wishes to include in response to the evaluation materials discussed in Step 4. At the end of week ten (10), in cases in which the faculty mem...

Related to Timeline for Evaluation and Reappointment Review

  • Criteria for Evaluation Criteria for employee performance review shall be made available to the employee before the start of the evaluation period and shall remain unchanged during the evaluation period unless the employee is made aware of the changes.

  • Responsibility for Evaluation Within each school the Principal will be responsible for the evaluation of employees assigned to that school. Evaluation will be made by the Principal or a qualified administrator. An employee assigned to more than one school will be evaluated by the Principal of the school in which the employee is assigned for the greater amount of time, with input provided by the Principal of the other school. Any Principal or person charged with the responsibility of evaluation of employees may involve other staff and students in the process if acceptable to the certificated teacher being evaluated.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION A. The evaluations of school year employees covered by this agreement shall be completed no later than May 30 of each school year for 9-month employees and by June 30 for 10/12-month employees. The evaluation shall be reviewed with the employee, with a copy given to the employee at the conclusion of the review. An employee may present written comments, which shall be attached to the written evaluation document. The evaluator and employee shall sign the evaluation document. The employee’s signature does not constitute approval or disapproval, but only that the evaluation has been reviewed with the employee.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Implementation and Review The Parties shall consult annually, or as otherwise agreed, to review the implementation of this Chapter and consider other matters of mutual interest affecting trade in services. (10) 10 Such consultations will be addressed under Article 170 (Free Trade Commission) of Chapter 14 (Administration of the Agreement).

  • Medical Appointments Medical appointments may be charged to sick leave, provided the minimum time charged is not less than one-half (1/2) hour. Each absence shall be reported separately and authorized in advance by the employee's immediate supervisor.

  • Scope of Services and Term Member Agency has requested WRCOG to provide certain professional service (“Services”) offered under the Program

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

  • EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS 30.1 The Employer will carry out evaluation of details and information provided in post- Qualification Questionnaire and any bidder who does not qualify shall not have his/her bid evaluated further.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.