Peer Evaluations Sample Clauses

Peer Evaluations a. Peer evaluations shall be conducted by a faculty member from the candidate’s department, chosen by the faculty member with the approval of the chairperson. The faculty member to be evaluated and the faculty member to do the evaluation shall agree upon a time for the evaluation. Within one week of the evaluation, the evaluator shall submit a written report to the faculty member evaluated and the Department Chairperson. If the faculty member evaluated wishes, s/he may append a written response to the report before placing it in his/her record file.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Peer Evaluations. A probationary faculty member may, during any academic year solicit three confidential peer evaluations. The peer evaluations shall be sought from tenured faculty members mutually agreed upon by the probationary faculty member and the appropriate Academic Xxxx or administrative designee. The participation of tenured faculty in peer evaluations shall be voluntary. Peer evaluations shall be sent to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs not later than 90 days prior to the end of the academic year.
Peer Evaluations. Evaluative materials, or summaries thereof, prepared by peer(s) as part of a regular evaluation system, may be placed in an evaluation file when signed by the evaluator or a representative of a peer committee, with a copy provided to the employee. The employee being evaluated shall have the opportunity to review and sign the evaluation prior to it being placed in the evaluation file.
Peer Evaluations. 11.7.1 Peer evaluations will be conducted annually by each member of the Tenure Review Committee in the form of observations. Faculty should refer to Appendix M: “In-Person Classroom Observation Reporting Form” and Appendix N: “On-Line Classroom Observation Reporting Form.”
Peer Evaluations. In the event that another associate faculty member is appointed to serve as a peer evaluator by the evaluating administrator or the faculty member’s department, then they shall be paid for their time at the Other Professional Assignment Rate.
Peer Evaluations. The Member may choose a fellow faculty Member, who visits a class, interviews the individual, examines student evaluations and annual reports of professional activities (if the individual under review has chosen to provide copies of these materials), and writes an appraisal of the Member's performance according to the criteria established by GFC from time to time. Copies of the written reports are distributed to the Member, both administrative evaluators, and the appropriate Xxxx'x office and the Human Resources Office.
Peer Evaluations. AV values the benefit that employees can gain from peer feedback, and may in its discretion hold a 360 peer evaluation process. Regardless of whether AV exercises its discretion to institute an AV-administered peer evaluation process, it will make a peer evaluation form available to employees to use at their discretion. AV will not require that results of a 360 peer evaluation be shared with supervisors, will not be used as part of the formal performance evaluation, and will not be saved in employees’ personnel files. While all employees are strongly encouraged to participate in any 360 evaluation process, employees can elect to opt out of such process at any stage.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Peer Evaluations. Peer evaluation will be completed during the first year of employment. When possible, one peer evaluation of a class, library orientation session, library reference shift, or individual counseling session will be completed during the first quarter of employment with Olympic College. One peer evaluation of a class, library orientation session, library reference shift, or individual counseling session will be completed at least once each year for the next two years of employment. The peer will be assigned by the Division Xxxx. Adjunct Faculty may request a specific quarter to be evaluated. The peer evaluator will communicate with the adjunct faculty member before the evaluation to discuss the evaluation criteria (Section 4.5), and communicate again after the evaluation to discuss the results. The adjunct faculty member will receive a copy of the peer evaluation.
Peer Evaluations. Each peer will make a scheduled visit and evaluate at least one classroom presentation. Most or all of the sections taught by the faculty member should be evaluated by the FEC. Peers shall also review and evaluate instructional materials, which may include but are not limited to, course syllabi, example tests, and any major assignments, projects, or reports. Conclusions regarding the evaluations will be reported to the immediate administrator using the Faculty Evaluation Form (Schedule F-2).
Peer Evaluations. Counselors, librarians, and other nonteaching faculty will be evaluated using the standard approved faculty evaluation form (Schedule F-2). However, where specific job descriptions exist, they should be reviewed by the faculty member’s peers and administrator performing the evaluations and used where appropriate in their assessment of the faculty member’s performance.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.