Criteria for evaluation definition

Criteria for evaluation means the National Register criteria for evaluation described in 36 CFR §
Sample 1Sample 2
Criteria for evaluation. Efficacy: Primary Efficacy Variable: Duration of diarrhea (hours) between the start of treatment until last diarrheal/watery stool before recovery or end of study treatment (treatment duration maximal 5 days). Duration of diarrhea is defined by date and time of the evacuation of the final diarrheal stool derived from the daily diary. Secondary Efficacy Variables: • Number of recovered subjects per treatment group in total and until each individual treatment day. Mean and median time until recovery per treatment group. • Time until recovery, defined by date and time of the evacuation of the first of two consecutive normal stools. • Global Physician Assessment at the end of treatment: o 1 = Complete relief of acute diarrhea, o 2 = marked improvement of acute diarrhea, o 3 = moderate improvement of acute diarrhea, o 4 =slight improvement of acute diarrhea, o 5 = no change in acute diarrhea, o 6 =worsening of acute diarrhea. (Treatment success = GPA score of 1 or 2). Name of Sponsor: Xxxxxx Laboratories GmbH Name of Finished Product: Hidrasec Infants: Granules for Oral Suspension 10 mg Hidrasec Children: Granules for Oral Suspension 30 mg Hidrasec: 100 mg capsules Name of Active Ingredient(s): Racecadotril • For toilet trained children and adolescents: number of stools per day as well as number of watery stools per day from start of treatment and until end of study treatment. Safety: Adverse events, xxxxx xxxxx, physical examination in both treatment arms.
Sample 1
Criteria for evaluation. Primary Endpoints: [**] Secondary Endpoints: [**] Exploratory Endpoints: [**] • Reference Section J-List Attachments Please see the attached - Revised Attachment 9: Milestone Table – Major Deliverables. Attachment 9 – Revised Modification 0001 HHSO100201500018C ATTACHMENT 9 - Milestone Table - Major Deliverables Area WBS Short Description Milestone Estimated Completion Timeframe (Calendar days) PM 1.1.1.1 [**] Development Plan 42 days after contract award
Sample 1

Examples of Criteria for evaluation in a sentence

  • Criteria for evaluation of performance of bidders for pre-eligibility: S.

  • Criteria for evaluation is included in FAP-220-14-00 which is located at the following link: http://finance.ky.gov/services/eprocurement/Pages/LawsPrefRegsPolicies.aspx An evaluation form is included herein for your review.

  • Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

  • Criteria for evaluation of water status are an important step forward.

  • Criteria for evaluation of the Individual Directors including Independent Directors;i.

  • The Selection Committee will receive and evaluate the Statements of Qualifications submitted in response to this Request for Qualifications (RFQ), using the following criteria: Criteria for evaluation of Statements of Qualifications The Statements of Qualifications will be evaluated with respect to the following evaluation criteria: 20% Factor: Stability.

  • Criteria for evaluation of individual Directors include aspects such as attendance and contribution at Board/ Committee Meetings and guidance/ support to the management outside Board/ Committee Meetings.

  • Criteria for evaluation of performance of Independent Directors:1.

  • Criteria for evaluation of such requests are discussed in Clark v.

  • Criteria for evaluation consist of: attendance, conduct, applied effort and knowledge of the subjects both theoretical and practical as demonstrated by exam scores/grades.PERSONAL DATA CHANGEStudents will keep the school informed of any change in telephone number, address or name change in case of an emergency.PRE APPLICATION FOR STATE BOARD EXAMThe pre-application process significantly expedites the State Board testing process.


More Definitions of Criteria for evaluation

Criteria for evaluation. Efficacy: Primary composite endpoint: • Proportion of patients with an increase of 25% over Baseline MAP (without an increase in sum XXX from baseline) at 2 hours after the initiation of LJPC-501 OR a 25% reduction in sum XXX (without a decrease in MAP from baseline) at 2 hours after the initiation of LJPC-501 Secondary endpoints: • Adverse events, BP, HR, and routine clinical safety laboratory testing including blood chemistry, hematology, and urine output • Change in MAP from baseline to 24 hours • Change in concentration of serum lactate from baseline to 2 hours and to 24 hours • Change in PELOD score from Screening to 24 hours Exploratory endpoints: • Change in tissue oxygenation from baseline to 2 hours and to 24 hours • Change in HR from baseline to 2 hours • Change in sum XXX from baseline to 24 hours • 28-day all-cause mortality • Number of ventilator days • Number of days on a vasopressor • Change in PRISM and PIM2 scores from Screening to 24 hours Statistical methods: Data will be summarized and reported in a descriptive fashion. All patients who receive any amount of LJPC-501 will be included in the safety evaluation.
Sample 1

Related to Criteria for evaluation

  • Performance evaluation means evaluation of work and program participation as well as other areas of behavior.

  • Evaluation means an appraisal of an individual’s professional performance in relation to his or her job description and professional standards and based on, when applicable, the individual’s evaluation rubric.

  • Medical evaluation means the process of assessing an individual's health status that includes a medical history and a physical examination of an individual conducted by a licensed medical practitioner operating within the scope of his license.

  • Independent educational evaluation means an evaluation conducted by a qualified examiner who is not employed by the public agency responsible for the education of the child in question.

  • Evaluation Criteria means the criteria set out under the clause 27 (Evaluation Process) of this Part C, which includes the Qualifying Criteria, Functional Criteria and Price and Preferential Points Assessment.

  • Criteria means one of the eight (8) state defined categories to be scored.

  • Clinical evaluation means a systematic and planned process to continuously generate, collect, analyse and assess the clinical data pertaining to a device in order to verify the safety and performance, including clinical benefits, of the device when used as intended by the manufacturer;

  • Evaluation Team means the team appointed by the City; “Information Meeting” has the meaning set out in section 2.2;

  • Peer review means evaluation of professional services rendered by a professional practitioner.

  • Benchmark Review means a review of the Services carried out in accordance with paragraphs 2.1 to 2.3 of Schedule 7 (Value for Money) of this Framework Agreement to determine whether those Services represent Good Value;

  • Evaluation Committee means a body appointed to perform the evaluation of Offerors’ proposals.

  • Criterion means a definite numerical value or narrative statement promulgated by the water pollution control board to maintain or enhance water quality to provide for and fully protect designated uses of the waters of the state.

  • Site evaluation means a comprehensive analysis of soil and site conditions for an OWTS.

  • Clinical review criteria means the written screening procedures, decision abstracts, clinical protocols, and practice guidelines used by a health carrier to determine the necessity and appropriateness of health care services.

  • Methodology means the process used by the Steward to determine its calculation of its Supplied quantity of Designated Printed Paper and Packaging, including, but not limited to, data sources, percentage allocation of data reported, data collection systems, and the use of calculators, worksheets, commercial software, or mathematical formulae.

  • Performance Review means a summative evaluation of a teacher other than a beginning teacher and used to determine whether the teacher’s practice meets school district expectations and the Iowa teaching standards, and to determine whether the teacher’s practice meets school district expectations for career advancement in accordance with Iowa Code section 284.7.

  • Peer review committee means one or more persons acting in a peer review capacity who also serve as an officer, director, trustee, agent, or member of any of the following:

  • Nomination Criteria means the criteria made up of the Over-Riding Nomination Criteria andthe Specific Nomination Factors, and is also referred to as “this Criteria”.

  • Benchmarks mean the performance milestones that are set forth in Appendix D.

  • Over-Riding Nomination Criteria means the criteria set out in clause 4.2.

  • Scope of Services or “Scope of Work” means the work to be performed by the Proposer or Consultant as described in Section 2.0 of this RFP, as amended thereto.

  • Evaluation rubric means a set of criteria, measures, and processes used to evaluate all teaching staff members in a specific school district or local education agency. Evaluation rubrics consist of measures of professional practice, based on educator practice instruments and student outcomes. Each Board of Education will have an evaluation rubric specifically for teachers, another specifically for Principals, Vice Principals, and Assistant Principals, and evaluation rubrics for other categories of teaching staff members.

  • Valuation means an estimate of the value of real estate or real property.

  • Benchmarking Report means the report produced by the Supplier following the Benchmark Review and as further described in this Framework Schedule 7;

  • Review Criteria has the meaning assigned to that term in Section 12.02(b)(i).

  • District Evaluation Advisory Committee means a group created to oversee and guide the planning and implementation of the Board of Education's evaluation policies and procedures as set forth in N.J.A.C. 6A:10-2.3.