Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 377 (2019). 65 Xxxxxxxx, E. A., Xxxxx, G., Xxxxxxx, X. X. & Xx, X. Lithium-Ion Battery Supply Chain Considerations: Analysis of Potential Bottlenecks in Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. Joule 1, 229-243 (2017). 66 Xxx xxx Xxxxx, S., Xxxxxx, R., Xxxxxxxx, B. & Xxxxxx, X. Identifying supply risks by mapping the cobalt supply chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 156 (2020). 67 Banza Xxxxxx Xxxxx, X. et al. Sustainability of artisanal mining of cobalt in DR Congo. Nat. Sustain. 1, 495-504 (2018). 68 Xxxxx, C., Kieckhäfer, X., Xxxxxxxx, X. X. & Xxxxx, M. S. Assessment of social sustainability hotspots in the supply chain of lithium-ion batteries. in Procedia CIRP 292-297. 69 Xxxxxx, X. X. Xxxxx dynamics for forecasting material flows—Case study for housing in The Netherlands. Ecol. Econ. 59, 142-156 (2006). 70 Modeling the Performance and Cost of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric-Drive Vehicles, Third Edition (Argonne National Lab, 2019). xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/servlets/purl/1503280 71 Global EV Outlook 2019: Scaling-up the transition to electric mobility (International Energy Agency, 2019). xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/reports/global-ev-outlook-2019 72 Xxxxx, X. & Xxxx, N. What Will the Global Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet Look like through 2050? (2016). 73 World Energy Outlook 2020 (IEA, 2020). xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/reports/world-energy-outlook- 2020 74 Vehicle Size Classes Used in the Fuel Economy Guide (EPA, 2019).
Soc. Sci Med. and UK index values for ICECAP-O are reported in Coast et al. (2008) Soc. Sci Med. . Full references for these studies can be found at xxx.xxxxxx.xxxx.xx.xx. Research on the instrument’s validity, reliability, feasibility of use and sensitivity to change are still ongoing. References relating to the development of the instrument can be found at xxx.xxxxxx.xxxx.xx.xx. The developers of ICECAP-O are, in principle, happy for the instrument to be used by other researchers, particularly if this contributes to the study of the instrument’s properties in particular patient and client groups. Agreement to use the instrument is on the basis that: the instrument is not altered in any way, in terms of the nature of attributes, the wording of attributes, the levels of attributes, or the values provided by the research team. information resulting from research studies is made available (upon request) for the purposes of assessing validity, feasibility of use and sensitivity to change, if this is not the primary aim of the study (i.e. if the information will not be published by the user). use of the instrument is registered and is not for commercial gain If you would like to use the instrument, please return a signed copy of this agreement, giving details of your study, and indicating that you wish to use the ICECAP-O instrument. We will contact you indicating our agreement for you to use the ICECAP-O instrument in the named study. If your needs go beyond those outlined here – for example, if you wish to use the ICECAP-O instrument in a country outside the UK and thus are unsure about the applicability of wording in your country or if you need to develop a new translation of the instrument, please contact the developers of ICECAP-O to explore the possibility of conducting further developmental research collaboratively. Details of study Name of study: Principal Investigator: PI’s Institution: Contact name: Contact address: Contact telephone: Contact e-mail: Other applicants: Date study begins: Date study ends: Funding body: Brief abstract (please include: patient/client group and/or disease area, sample size, intervention (if applicable), length of follow-up, nature of follow-up (postal or interviewer administered), other instruments to be administered alongside ICECAP-O): We would like to use the ICECAP-O instrument for the purposes outlined in the agreement above and agree to the conditions of use as specified. Completion of this form constitutes agreement to ...
Soc. Sec. or E.I. No. ___________________________________________ # ____________________________ ___________________________________________ Telephone Number _____________ EACH UNDERSIGNED HEREBY REPRESENTS AND WARRANTS THAT He/she has read and reviewed carefully the Prospectus. EACH UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES THAT All Securities purchased hereby, whether Term Notes or DCA's, are subject to all the terms and conditions including, without limitation, subordination of the indebtedness evidenced thereby, as set forth in the Prospectus and the Indenture dated as of May 15, 1992 between the Company and Northern Central Bank, as Trustee. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS SECURITY IS NOT A SAVINGS ACCOUNT OR AN OBLIGATION OF AN INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION AND IS NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By executing this ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER, I (we), under penalty of perjury, certify that: (1) the number shown on this form is my (our) correct taxpayer number (T.I.N.) and (2) I (we) am (are) not subject to backup withholding either because of (a) I (we) am (are) exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I (we) have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that I (we) am (are) subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me (us) that I (we) am (are) no longer subject to backup withholding. (If you have been notified by the IRS that you are subject to backup withholding, delete the language in (2) above.)
Soc. Stu. goal: Ensure students attend face-to-face instruction on a daily basis and that students complete and submit assignments. Student Responsibilities: As a student, I agree to:
Soc. Sec. No./EIN: ___________________ IF A PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, TRUST OR OTHER BUSINESS ENTITY: By:___________________________________ Name: Title: IF AN INDIVIDUAL: ______________________________________ Signature
Soc. Sec. or Tax ID: ----------------------
Soc. Sorelec.74 In Germany, the jurisdiction of German courts was based on the provisions of Zivilprozessordnung on territorial competence; there was no special rule concerning disputes with an international element.75 Already in 1877 Article 38 of Zivilprozessordnung expressly allowed the rule on the choice-of-court agreements on territorial competence.76 In Italy, in contrast with France or Germany, international selection agreement, but, the oral evidence was excluded in the certain cases, see Article 7 of Code of Civil Procedure requiring signature (and as a consequence the written form): «Thus, the judge will proceed although he is not the natural judge of the parties; for neither the defendant’s domicile nor the situs of the object of the litigation is within his district. The parties’ declaration demanding judgment must be signed by them, or, if they are unable to sign, this must be noted.» and Article 1341 of the Civil Code: «An act must be made before notaries or under private signature, respecting all things exceeding the sum or value of one hundred and fifty francs, even in the case of voluntary deposits; and no proof can be received by witnesses against or beyond what is contained in such acts, nor touching what shall be alleged to have been said before, at the time of or subsequently to such acts, although there may be question of a sum or value less than 150 francs; The whole without prejudice to what is prescribed in the laws relative to commerce.». The case law of the French court was very progressive – the prorogation stipulations could form part of the bylaws of stock companies and general terms and conditions, the explicit acceptance was often required, but no waiver of French jurisdiction was permitted in case of immovable property situated in France, rectification of national Registers of Civil Status, or letters of patent or trademarks issued or registered by domestic authorities, see (also translation) X. XXXXXXX, The Parties’ Choice of a Forum: “Prorogation Agreements”, op. cit., p. 421, 441, 443, 444, 445, 448, 477, 479;
Soc. A, volume 472, page 20150607. The Royal Society, 2016. doi:10.1098/rspa.2015.0607. [55] X. Xxx, X. X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxx. One-dof superimposed rigid origami with multiple states. Sci. Rep., 6:36883, 2016. doi:10.1038/srep36883. [56] K. Song, X. Xxxx, X. Xxxx, X. Xxxx, and X. You. Design of rigid- foldable doubly curved origami tessellations based on trapezoidal crease patterns. Proc. R. Soc. A, 473(2200):20170016, 2017. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2017.0016. [57] X. X. Xxxxx, X. X. Xxxx, X.X. Xxxxxxx, and X. X. Xxxxxx. Rigidly foldable origami gadgets and tessellations. Xxx. Soc. Open Sci., 2(9):150067, 2015. doi:10.1098/rsos.150067. [58] X. Xxxxxxxxxxx and X. xxx Xxxxx. Origami building blocks: Generic and special four-vertices. Phys. Rev. E, 93(2):023003, Feb 2016. doi: 10.1103/physreve.93.023003.
