School Improvement Planning. 1. The school district will establish a $20,000 fund for summer school improvement planning projects.
School Improvement Planning. It is recognized by the parties that school improvement is best facilitated at the local school building level through the participation and involvement of staff and community. The parties further recognize the following:
School Improvement Planning. Site Based Decision Making
School Improvement Planning. Site Based Decision Making is a collaborative process which seeks to improve both the quality of education and the quality of work life within the school.
School Improvement Planning. Process 12.12 During the school improvement planning process, affected staff shall meet to:
School Improvement Planning. 24-1-1 The district has engaged a process to improve the level of student learning based on the state’s accountability system and best practice defined in educational research. To that end, each school shall establish a School Improvement Process (SIP) Core Team according to its own local governance procedures. Members may be elected or appointed, but should represent a wide cross section of opinions and perspectives. Members will serve at the discretion of the principal. The purpose of the team is to facilitate the development of the school’s improvement plan in accordance with the process and function defined by the LCSD’s School Improvement Process. Each school must adopt its plan through a method for determining consensus that has been proven to be effective by research. The plan must represent the well-informed will of the entire local school community of stakeholders.
School Improvement Planning. Four (4) days annually shall be used for school improvement planning. On these scheduled days, students will have a modified school day. Any additional school improvement planning or early release days shall be mutually agreed upon between the Board and Association.
School Improvement Planning. Separate from the leadership program, AMIDEAST attempted to engage the principals in a school improvement planning process. The initial sessions were given by the MSN Deputy Chief of Party, Dr. Xxxx Xxxxx, from Ramallah via digital video conferencing. Two consultants were hired locally in Gaza to follow up on the planning process for each school. A manual was produced for the accredited Leadership Diploma Program in the West Bank and used with the private school principals in Gaza. The school improvement planning process focused on five areas.
School Improvement Planning. To assist schools and systems to strategically enhance their school improvement planning efforts, the DOE and SACS CASI encourage Georgia schools and systems to use a variety of resources including the Georgia School Keys – Unlocking Excellence Through the Georgia School Standards, the Georgia Assessment of Performance on School Standards: Closing the Gap (GAPSS Analysis), and DOE related tools such as the School Improvement Fieldbook, and the Implementation Resource: Building Capacity Through Best Practices, as well as the research- based school improvement process, BreakThrough School Improvement, and related SACS CASI tools, such as Practitioners’ Guides, self-assessments and rubrics. Learning Network of Georgia Districts The Partners agree to use the SACS CASI district accreditation protocol to establish a learning network among and between districts approved to pursue this protocol. The DOE/SACS CASI Work Team will explore ways and create opportunities for said districts to share best practices, provide input regarding ways to further reduce duplication of effort at the school level, and systemically strengthen district leadership for quality improvement. Training Reciprocity • The Department will invite SACS CASI State Directors to attend Department sponsored school improvement training, including that related to the roll-out of standards for school performance, the DOE/SACS CASI process, and regional support team meetings. • On an annual basis SACS CASI will provide assistance for up to three Department members of the Work Team to attend the SACS CASI Annual Conference on School Improvement. External Review Team Reciprocity DOE/SACS CASI Process • If a SACS accredited school is within one year of its regularly scheduled SACS CASI review and the school is required to undergo a mandatory Georgia Assessment of Performance on School Standards (GAPSS) Analysis, the school’s preparation for the GAPSS Analysis will include completion of the SACS CASI Online Standards Assessment Report in addition to materials required by the GAPSS Analysis protocols. These materials will be reviewed and validated by the joint review team during the GAPSS Analysis visit and the results of the review will be addressed by the team in its recommendations. The GAPSS Analysis team will consist of a balanced representation of DOE and SACS CASI representatives. • If a SACS accredited school voluntarily uses the Georgia School Keys and the Georgia Assessment of Performance on Schoo...
