Qualifications of Bidders; Evaluation and Selection Process Sample Clauses

Qualifications of Bidders; Evaluation and Selection Process. The objective of this request for bids process is to select a Bidder whose proposal is judged through the evaluation process outlined in this section, to be in the best interests of the Town of Manlius. All proposals will be evaluated according to the requirements of XXX XXX §000, information submitted, including, in addition to having the lowest responsive bid relevant Unit Pricing, and being deemed responsible, as legally permitted and applicable under the additional criteria set forth at NYS GML §120-w, including: (a) evaluation and verification of the Bidder’s qualifications, experiences and references; (b) evaluation of technical information; (c) evaluation of past experience the Town has with the Contractor; (d) analysis of financial and economic information; or (e) any outstanding violations of the Contractor of federal, state or local rules, regulations, laws or civil/criminal suits that would affect the Contractors ability to permform the Work. The Town, as its option, will select the proposal most advantageous and suitable to the needs of the Town. Each proposal will be evaluated for completeness and responsiveness. The determination of responsibility may also include consideration of, as legally permitted, the criteria described under GML §120-w, but if the lowest responsive bid is rejected in favor of another bid/bidder, such rejected bidder shall be provided notice of the particulars and if controverted in writing within five (5) days thereof, an opportunity to be heard by the Town in executive session, if permitted by law and so directed by the Town. At the Town’s discretion during the evaluation process, it may either reject any proposal deemed incomplete or nonconforming with instructions or request further information or clarification from Bidders. Proposals of non-qualifying Bidders will not be considered for further evaluation. Each proposal will also be evaluated to determine if the minimum financial and technical requirements are met. While the overall cost to the Town District residents will constitute a major criterion for the evaluation of the proposals, the Town reserves the right to assess the entire proposal for each of the evaluation categories described. The Bidder must demonstrate sufficient financial resources to meet all contract requirements. The proposal will be evaluated relative to the Bidder’s creditworthiness, annual report, financial statements, and bonding ability. Contractor experience, in general, project experienc...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Qualifications of Bidders; Evaluation and Selection Process

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Selection of projects and financial parameters 4.1 Open calls and availability of funds (including number of calls, duration of calls, and estimated size):

  • Application and Selection (1) Application for professional development leave shall contain an appropriate outline of the project or work to be accomplished during the leave.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Committee Composition and Selection 1. The committee shall be comprised of eight members as follows: • five Teachers • three administrators

  • Modifications and Updates to the Wire Center List and Subsequent Transition Periods 2.1.4.12.1 In the event BellSouth identifies additional wire centers that meet the criteria set forth in Section 2.1.4.5, but that were not included in the Initial Wire Center List, BellSouth shall include such additional wire centers in a carrier notification letter (CNL). Each such list of additional wire centers shall be considered a “Subsequent Wire Center List”.

  • Accessibility of Web-Based Information and Applications For State Agency Authorized User Acquisitions: Any web-based information and applications development, or programming delivered pursuant to the contract or procurement, will comply with New York State Enterprise IT Policy NYS-P08-005, Accessibility of Web-Based Information and Applications as follows: Any web-based information and applications development, or programming delivered pursuant to the contract or procurement, will comply with New York State Enterprise IT Policy NYS-P08- 005, Accessibility of Web-Based Information and Applications as such policy may be amended, modified or superseded, which requires that state agency web-based information and applications are accessible to persons with disabilities. Web-based information and applications must conform to New York State Enterprise IT Policy NYS-P08-005 as determined by quality assurance testing. Such quality assurance testing will be conducted by the State Agency Authorized User and the results of such testing must be satisfactory to the Authorized User before web-based information and applications will be considered a qualified deliverable under the contract or procurement.

  • Forecasting Requirements for Trunk Provisioning Within ninety (90) days of executing this Agreement, Reconex shall provide Verizon a two (2) year traffic forecast. This initial forecast will provide the amount of traffic to be delivered to and from Verizon over each of the Local Interconnection Trunk groups over the next eight (8) quarters. The forecast shall be updated and provided to Verizon on an as-needed basis but no less frequently than semiannually. All forecasts shall comply with the Verizon CLEC Interconnection Trunking Forecast Guide and shall include, at a minimum, Access Carrier Terminal Location (“ACTL”), traffic type (Local Traffic/Toll Traffic, Operator Services, 911, etc.), code (identifies trunk group), A location/Z location (CLLI codes for Reconex-IPs and Verizon-IPs), interface type (e.g., DS1), and trunks in service each year (cumulative).

  • Demographic, Classification and Wage Information XXXXXX agrees to coordinate the accumulation and distribution of demographic, classification and wage data, as specified in the Letter of Understanding dated December 14, 2011, to CUPE on behalf of Boards of Education. The data currently housed in the Employment Data and Analysis Systems (EDAS) will be the source of the requested information.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.