Determination of Responsibility. During bid evaluation, the college reserves the right to make reasonable inquiry to determine the responsibility of any bidder. Requests may include, but not be limited to, financial statements, credit ratings, references, record of past performance, on-site inspection of bidder's, or bidder's subcontractor's facilities. Failure to respond to said request(s) will be sufficient reason to consider the bid non-responsive. During the contract term, should the contractor be determined to be in violation of federal, state, or local laws or regulations, the state reserves the right to modify its initial determination of responsibility at the time of award and to take other action as determined appropriate, including but not limited to termination of the contract.
Determination of Responsibility. A decisionmaker, who is not the Title IX coordinator or the investigator, will apply (a preponderance of the evidence standard) or (a clear and convincing evidence standard) to determine responsibility, and will issue a written determination of responsibility that:
Determination of Responsibility. In order to be considered responsible, an Offeror must demonstrate that it meets the requirements of FAR 9.104-1. The Contracting Officer's determination of an Offeror's responsibility or non-responsibility may be based upon any information obtained by the Contracting Officer, and is independent of the evaluation of offers set forth herein.
Determination of Responsibility. (JAN 2003) A determination of responsibility will be made on the apparent successful offeror prior to contract award. If the prospective contractor is found non-responsible, that offeror will be rejected and will receive no further consideration for award. In the event a contractor is rejected based on a determination of non- responsibility, a determination will be made on the next apparent successful offeror. (end) Provision 3-85, Explanation to Prospective Offerors Include the following provision as prescribed in § 330.10.30(m) (Provisions and Clauses).
Determination of Responsibility. The State may review the highest-ranking Suppliers or its key team members to ensure that the Supplier is responsible. The Contract may not be awarded to a Supplier that is determined to be not responsible. The State’s determination of a Supplier’s responsibility may include the following factors: the Supplier’s and its key team members’ experience, past conduct on previous Contracts, past performance on previous Contracts, ability to execute this contract properly and management skill. The State will make such determination of responsibility based on the Supplier’s quotation, reference evaluations and any other information the State requests or determines to be relevant. Changing Candidates The major criterion on which the State bases the award of the contract is the quality of the Supplier's candidate(s). Changing personnel after the award may be a basis for termination of the contract.
Determination of Responsibility. A. During bid evaluation, the state reserves the right to make reasonable inquiry to determine the responsibility of any bidder. Requests may include, but not be limited to, financial statements, credit ratings, references, record of past performance, on-site inspection of bidder's, or bidder's subcontractor's facilities. Failure to respond to said request(s) will be sufficient reason to consider the bid nonresponsive.
Determination of Responsibility. [Note: The decision maker cannot be the investigator or Title IX Coordinator, and must receive specific training. If appeals are to be heard by the Superintendent, the Board should determine if they wish to use particular upper-level administrators as decision makers.]
Determination of Responsibility. The District reserves the right to make reasonable inquiry to determine the responsibility of any Contractor. Requests may include, but not be limited to, financial statements, credit ratings, references, record of past performance, on-site inspection of Contractor's or Contractor's subcontractor's facilities. Failure to comply with said request(s) would be sufficient reason to consider the proposal in noncompliance. AWARD FACTORS
Determination of Responsibility. During the contract term, should the Contractor be determined to be in violation of federal, state, or local laws or regulations, the Purchaser reserves the right to modify its initial determination of responsibility at the time of award and to take other action as determined appropriate, including but not limited to termination of the contract/field order.
Determination of Responsibility. (1) Responses will only be considered from entities who are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods/equipment/services required by the Formal Solicitation. Bidder/Proposer must be able to demonstrate a satisfactory record of performance and integrity; and have sufficient financial, material, equipment, facility, personnel resources, and expertise to meet all Contractual requirements. The terms “equipment and organization” as used herein shall be construed to mean a fully equipped and well-established entity in line with the best industry practices in the industry as determined by the MPA.
