Evaluation Categories. Evaluation of the competence of unit members (see Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Form - - Appendix I) shall include, but shall not be limited to, consideration of:
Evaluation Categories. 7 9.7.1 In each standard the evaluator will indicate whether the employee meets the standard, 8 partially meets the standard, or does not meet the standard 1 The overall evaluation “boxes” will be changed as follows: 2 Level I: Meets or exceeds standards Continue employment without 3 Xxxxxxxxxxx 0 Xxxxx XX: Needs improvement in one or Improvement plan to be and 6 more standards than two standards developed 7 and implemented at the school site 9 Level III: Does not meet standards Continue employment with an 10 improvement plan which specifically 11 addresses all standards which are not 12 fully met. The unit member must 13 participate in the District Peer 14 Assistance and Review Program as 15 defined in Article 10.4 of the collective 16 bargaining agreement if it is available, 17 or any other district identified 18 assistance program that may provide 19 support for the unit member to 20 improve their performance to meet the 21 identified standards for the position in 22 which they were evaluated. 24 Level IV: Unsatisfactory Referred to Assistant Superintendent, 25 Human Resources, for appropriate 26 Personnel action(s). The unit member 27 must participate in the District Peer 28 Assistance and Review Program as 29 defined in Article 10.4 of the collective 30 bargaining agreement if it is available, 31 or any other district identified 32 assistance program that may provide 33 support for the unit member to 34 improve their performance to meet the 35 identified standards for the position in 36 which they were evaluated. SANTA XXXX CITY SCHOOLS OPTION 1-A PROFESSIONAL GOAL (To be completed by the Unit Member by October 10th) NAME LOCATION GRADE-LEVEL/SUBJECT SCHOOL YEAR EVALUATOR DATE Directions: Prior to attending the Initial Evaluation Conference, complete Section 1 below. Selection of specific areas to focus your Professional Development is based on a self-analysis of your current teaching practice. You are highly encouraged to select areas that are meaningful to your growth as a Unit Member. Bring this form, unsigned, to your Initial Evaluation Conference.
Evaluation Categories. Unit members in temporary or probationary status shall be evaluated through the Tier I Evaluation Process. All other bargaining unit members with permanent, continuing status shall be evaluated through the Tier II Evaluation Process.
Evaluation Categories. Evaluation categories shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
Evaluation Categories. Evaluation of the competence of unit members under this program shall include, but shall not be limited to, consideration of knowledge of work, quality of work productivity, dependability, communication skills, inititative, interpersonal relations, professionalism and safety practices. Each rating other than Standard (below or above) requires an explanation in the Comments box beside the category. Each rating below Standard must be based on issues discussed with the employee prior to the evaluation, supported by a statement of facts in the Comments box, and accompanied by a separate Development Plan. The Supervisor should include information on staff member’s overall performance highlighting (1) areas of strengths; (2) areas for further development; (3) areas for improvements; and (4) areas where unique or extraordinary factors contribute to the evaluation. Subsequently, one or more conferences shall be held with the unit member to assist him/her in correcting deficiencies previously noted. A record of such conferences shall be prepared by the evaluator for the file on the unit member and a copy submitted to him/her. The District and Federation agree that this article may be reopened during annual negotiations without either party using one of its designated re-openers.
Evaluation Categories. Each Unit member’s evaluation process will include the form in Appendix B of the Agreement. The Unit member shall also be given the opportunity to complete and submit the form in Appendix B, as a self-assessment tool, to be given consideration in their overall evaluation. The categories of the evaluation shall include the following based on the classification:
Evaluation Categories. 1) Evaluation of the competence of unit members under this program shall include, but shall not be limited to, consideration of knowledge of work, quality of work productivity, dependability, communication skills, initiative, interpersonal relations, professionalism and safety practices.
Evaluation Categories. Evaluation of the competence of unit members under this program shall include, but shall not be limited to, consideration of quality of work, work habits, working relations, demonstration of initiative, meeting work commitments, dependability and reliability, punctuality, safety, and communication skills. Written evaluations and the summary assessment report of unit member shall include descriptions of unsatisfactory performance, if any, with specific recommendations for means of improvement and suggestions of available sources of assistance. Subsequently, one or more conferences shall be held with the unit member to assist him/her in correcting deficiencies previously noted. A record of such conferences shall be prepared by the evaluator for the file on the unit member and a copy submitted to him/her. The District and Federation agree that this article may be reopened during annual negotiations without either party using one of its designated re-openers.
Evaluation Categories. 23.5.1 Five qualitative categories will be used for evaluation. The categories shall be Excellent, Very Good, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement, and Unsatisfactory. The same category system will be used for annual evaluations, promotion applications, tenure applications and post-tenure review.
Evaluation Categories. Unit members in temporary or probationary status shall be evaluated through the Tier I Evaluation Process. All other bargaining unit members with permanent, continuing status shall be evaluated through the Tier II Evaluation Process unless the unit member chooses the Tier I Process. Evaluation documents are incorporated into Appendix “A,” which includes job-specific forms for Counselors and School Psychologists as well as global forms for all other unit members. Permanent unit members who have been employed by the District for at least ten (10) years and whose evaluations meet the District’s expectations shall, by mutual agreement of the administrator and unit member, be evaluated up to every five (5) years (pursuant to terms of Education Code Section 44664). (Per section 9.4.1)
