Number of Items. Boeing and Buyer have mutually agreed on a list of specific equipment (the SPE Item) for which Buyer shall negotiate directly with the vendors to establish the price for each SPE Item. The SPE Item list includes seats, galleys, and interior furnishings. Buyer shall provide the price of the SPE Item when Buyer notifies Boeing of the SPE Item vendor.
Number of Items. Collection notice Xxxxx-bek City Council is committed to protecting your privacy in accordance with the Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014 (Vic) and the Health Records Act 2001 (Vic). The personal information requested on this form is being collected by Xxxxx-bek City Council for the purpose of assessing your eligibility for a footpath trading permit or any other directly related purpose under the Local Government Act 1989 or other relevant legislation and may also be used to update your personal information otherwise held by Council (for example, contact details including email address, phone number). It will not be disclosed to any other external party without your consent, unless required or authorised by law. If the personal information is not provided your application cannot be processed or a permit issued. You can gain access to your personal information you have provided to Xxxxx-bek City Council and if you wish to alter it, please contact Council’s Privacy Officer via telephone on 0000 0000 or e-mail at Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx-xxx.xxx.xxx.xx. I (please print) understand that the information provided above will be used in accordance with relevant legislation and declare that this information is correct to the best of my knowledge. Date Signed by applicant PART B – Extension to Footpath Trading area Fill in Part B if in addition to your immediate footpath trading area, you would like to apply to trade on the footpath outside an adjoining business. Note: Written consent from the tenant or operator of the adjoining business must be obtained. Where the adjoining building is vacant, consent is required from the managing agent. Where the adjoining building is residential, consent is required from the body corporate. Is your business in a residential area? Do you have a disabled parking bay in front of your premises? Do you have a loading zone bay in front of your premises? Y Y Y N N YOU MUST PROVIDE COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS (YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION) Updated site plan showing placement of items on footway (a site plan template is included in this application). The site plan must show where the items will be placed, specific measurements of the trading zone, walkway zone and kerbside zone and any council infrastructure such as rubbish bins or bike hoops. Written consent from the tenant or operator of the adjoining property. Where the adjoining building is vacant, consent is required from the managing...
Number of Items. The second part of the study attempted to understand whether poor inter-rater agreement could be ascribed to any one or two raters. The different professional experiences of the raters could have led to different perceptions of difficulty. Since the category “invalid question” was rarely used, its results are omitted from this analysis. For each rater, the number of items assigned to each level of difficulty was totalled for each of the four papers. The mean ±SD was then calculated for all four papers. Figure 4 shows the results. Figure 4 Mean ± SD number of items assigned to levels of difficulty 1–4 by each rater (n = 4 examination papers) Figure 4 shows that all four raters rated more items as level 1 (easy) than any other category. The second-highest level was 2 (moderately challeng- ing). Level 4 (very difficult) was rarely used by any of the raters. Rater UA rated more questions as difficult and very difficult than the other three raters. Rater TI rated more questions as easy or moderately challenging than all other raters. The small standard deviations indicate that there was little variation in each raters’ ratings among the four papers. A chi-squared test yielded a value of 15.61, which is not large enough to be significant (p = 0.16). Xxxxxx’x V measures the strength of association between two categorical variables, in this case, rater and use of levels of difficulty. Xxxxxx’x V confirmed the results of the chi-squared test and showed that the effect size was small (V = 0.154, p = 0.134). Table 2 summarizes the percentage of items assigned to levels 1 and 2, 3 and 4 and invalid items by each rater. Table 2 points to a possible source of unreliability. Since most of the items were rated 1 or 2 by all four raters, unreliability could result from disagreement in distinguishing easy from moderately challenging. This could be a flaw in the task, which had too many levels of difficulty. Table 2 Summary of mean percentage of items assigned to invalid, easier (1 & 2) and more difficult (3 & 4) levels Rater Invalid Levels 1 + 2 Levels 3 + 4 UA 6.6% 62.3% 31.2% TD 0% 80.4% 19.7% SA 4.9% 77.0% 18.0% TI 1.6% 85.2% 13.1% Discussion This study provides empirical evidence that, despite intensive practice and discussion, a team of four expert raters achieved low inter-rater agreement in evaluating the level of difficulty of Life Sciences examination papers using a 5-level rating. This is in agreement with Xxxxxxx et al. (2012), who found that expert rating was th...
