Future Challenges Sample Clauses

Future Challenges. Whilst Magenta Living’s current business plan is strong, there are a number of upcoming challenges to its revenue streams in the future including: • with the continued ‘right to buy’ and selective demolition of non-sustainable homes the organisation needs to be able to build more replacement homes to ensure it continues to have the economies of scale to continue to deliver high quality services. Magenta Living had 13,087 homes at transfer and this has reduced to 12,133 homes as at 31 March 2014. • reduced public subsidy to build new affordable housing will require housing associations to look at raising funding in other ways to provide the ‘subsidy’ for social and affordable rent schemes • with continuing reforms to welfare spending there will be reduced support to rent payers and potentially reduced income which will need to be offset with income from other sources in order for Magenta Living to carry on providing the services presently being delivered • working in more deprived neighbourhoods at a time when competing pressures have resulted in publicly funded services being withdrawn Magenta Living will have to identify new sources of funding in order to provide wider services to support its communities.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Future Challenges. As described above, in the thirty-some years since the Stockholm Conference in 1972, the international commu- nity has held many conferences to try to resolve global environmental issues. Numerous discussions have been held, covering differences dividing the northern and southern hemispheres. For example, in the discussion about a post-2013 framework at the 2002 Johannesburg Summit (attended by heads of States from 104 countries and representatives from over 190 countries), while the developed countries sought a framework that would require the participation of all countries, the Group of 77 (G77) and China (a group of developing states in the UN) were worried about missing out on their countries’ oppor- tunity for economic development and took an opposing stance, saying that until the developed countries could fully implement the Kyoto Protocol, they should not ask other countries for new commitments. The difference in position and opinion also exists within the camps of the developed countries and the developing countries. Among the developed countries, there were debates on how to formulate a post-2013 framework, including methods to determine the national emissions tar- gets and the base year. The developing countries, represent- ed by the G77 and China, are made up of many groups; namely, emerging economies such as China, India, and Brazil; OPEC countries that export oil to developed coun- tries and Arabian oil-producing countries; the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) that are most vulnerable to the impacts (rise in sea level) of global warming; and African countries that have low GHG emissions but are most sus- ceptible to the impacts of global warming. Thus, the groups advocated different claims based on their different positions. For example, the AOSIS, wary of the rise of the emerging economies, asserted that differentiated responsibilities among developing countries should be incorporated into the post-2013 framework. The position and opinion held by different countries are becoming increasingly complicated. As a result, interna- tional negotiations of global warming issues have also become extremely difficult. In order to reduce GHG emis- sions drastically on a global scale and find a solution to global warming issues, the post-2013 framework must
Sample 1
Future Challenges. It is desirable that new examples of Good Practices are added and accumulated continually and systematically. This will allow the final report of Annex VIII activities to cover a wider regional area and collect more cases covering the full range of issues. This will overcome the present deficiencies in some areas and enhance the value of this report to users. For example, although sand sedimentation into reservoirs is one of the most urgent issues that require prompt measures all over the world, the collection of cases includes only one example which is related to a small-scale reservoir in Asia. In addition, it is possible to collect cases on subjects and issues not already included in this report. This could include “change in river topography associated with flooding or sand sedimentation” and “outbreak of water- borne infectious diseases”, which have already been recognized widely, and cases dealing with contributions towards the reduction of global warming (for example, CDM using hydropower) as a contemporary case related to benefits brought about by hydropower development. Table 1: List of Good Practice Reports (1/2) Key Issue & Project Name (*1) Country Main Subject (GP) (*2) Project Type (*3) GP Phase (*4) Sub Key Issues Climate (*5) Major Reasons for Success KI-1: Biological Diversity 1 Okinawa Seawater PSPP Japan Ecosystem Conservation Measures PS CO Cf Consult Experts 2 Okutadami & Ohtori Expansion Hydropower Project Japan Ecosystem Conservation Measures R PC 11 Cf EMS, Proper Design, Adadptive Mnagement 3 Shin-Hannou Substation Japan Afforestation and Revegetation of Construction Site in Harmony with Surrounding Environments SS PCO 10 Cf Consult Experts 4 Tomura PP Japan Post-Project Investigation of River Ecosystem Recovery R O Df Consult Experts & Stakeholders, Proper Monitering 5 Palmiet PSPP South Africa Ecosystem Conservation by Environmental Management Plan PS PCO 14 Cs EIA & Proper Planning, Consult Experts & Stakeholders KI-2: Hydrological Regimes
Sample 1
Future Challenges. Fish Flow Releases‌ 5 The City has not yet finalized a flow agreement with state and federal fishery agencies. Two flow 6 regimes have been identified and are being used by the WSAC to assess water supply reliability 7 implications. The lower bound flow regime is called “City Proposal” and the upper bound flow regime 8 is called “DFG-5.” Both result in less water available for diversion than the natural flows discussed 9 above and both have different impacts on the long-term availability of water to meet City needs.
Sample 1
Future Challenges. Challenges center on Title 21 CFR Part 11. Title 21 CFR Part 11 is part of the code of federal regulation established by the FDA on electronic records and electronic signatures. It defines the regulations through which her, as well as electronic signatures, are considered trustworthy and equivalent to paper records (33,34). It particularly targets pharmaceutical industries, contract research organizations, and biotechnologies companies. It requires the implementation of auditing and validation on any software or IT system that deals with EHR (35-37). This regulation in particular can be challenging because of the costs associated and the possible impracticality due to the FDA’s statements regarding (enforcement discretion) in applying this regulation. Additionally, this regulation is currently under revision. These different factors have led to confusion on how and what exactly is required (37). We will comply with the regulations once the final revision is assigned. We will keep “hard copies” of EHR and use it as the authoritative document for regulation purposes.
Sample 1
Future Challenges. The sustainability strategies implemented by CSRA depend on securing Bolivian Government funds. This is a high-risk business. CSRA has been very successful to date, given the limited time frame during which decentralization and municipal financial management and decision- making processes have been in place in Bolivia. A key requirement for future success in shared management of health systems is to tighten formal agreements with municipal and regional governments and MOH Districts. Another requirement is on-going training of municipal authorities in the basics of health governance. This is essential given the frequent changes that take place among municipal leaders. Another key for success is for CSRA to reduce its commitment to municipal governments that do not provide the agreed upon counterpart funding. As CSRA enters into new geographical areas, clear conditions are now placed on municipal government partners, including a commitment for on-going operational expenses for local health systems.
Sample 1

Related to Future Challenges

  • Challenges The Experts may be challenged by either Party if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to any of their impartiality or independence. In such circumstances the challenge shall be brought by written notice to the ICC copied to the other Party within fourteen (14) calendar days of the appointment of the relevant Expert or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenging Party becoming aware of the circumstances giving rise to the challenge. Unless the challenged Expert withdraws. or whichever of the Parties that has not brought the challenge agrees to the challenge, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenge, the ICC shall decide the challenge and, if appropriate, shall appoint a replacement Expert in accordance with the criteria set out herein.

  • No Challenges Each Shareholder agrees not to commence, join in, facilitate, assist or encourage, and agrees to take all actions necessary to opt out of any class in any class action with respect to, any claim, derivative or otherwise, against Parent, Merger Sub, the Company or any of their respective successors or directors (a) challenging the validity of, or seeking to enjoin the operation of, any provision of this Agreement or the Merger Agreement or (b) alleging a breach of any fiduciary duty of any person in connection with the evaluation, negotiation or entry into the Merger Agreement.

  • Legal Action If you are dissatisfied with the determination of your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law. Under state law, you may not begin court proceedings prior to the expiration of sixty (60) days after the date you filed your claim. In no event may legal action be taken against us later than three (3) years from the date you were required to file the claim. For members covered by a group (employer sponsored) health plan, your plan may be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended. Under federal law, if your plan is subject to ERISA you may have the right to bring legal action under section 502(a) of ERISA after you have exhausted all appeals available under the plan. That means, for both medical and administrative appeals, federal law requires that you pursue a final decision from the plan, prior to filing suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. For a medical appeal, that final decision is the determination of the appeal. You are not required to submit your claim to external review prior to filing a suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. Consult your employer to determine whether this applies to you and what your rights and obligations may be. If you are dissatisfied with the decision on your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law.

  • Legal Actions A Receiver may bring, prosecute, enforce, defend and abandon any action, suit or proceedings in relation to any Security Asset which he thinks fit.

  • Infringement Proceedings Each Party agrees to promptly notify the other Party of any unauthorized use of the other Party's Marks of which it has actual knowledge. Each Party will have the sole right and discretion to bring proceedings alleging infringement of its Marks or unfair competition related thereto; provided, however, that each Party agrees to provide the other Party with its reasonable cooperation and assistance with respect to any such infringement proceedings.

  • Challenge If Executive violates or challenges the enforceability of any provisions of the Restrictive Covenants or this Release, no further payments, rights or benefits under Section 5 of the Agreement will be due to Executive (except where such provision would be prohibited by applicable law, rule or regulation).

  • Infringement Controlled Affiliate shall promptly notify Plan and Plan shall promptly notify BCBSA of any suspected acts of infringement, unfair competition or passing off that may occur in relation to the Licensed Marks and Name. Controlled Affiliate shall not be entitled to require Plan or BCBSA to take any actions or institute any proceedings to prevent infringement, unfair competition or passing off by third parties. Controlled Affiliate agrees to render to Plan and BCBSA, without charge, all reasonable assistance in connection with any matter pertaining to the protection of the Licensed Marks and Name by BCBSA.

  • No Challenge Stockholder agrees not to commence, join in, facilitate, assist or encourage, and agrees to take all actions necessary to opt out of any class in any class action with respect to, any claim, derivative or otherwise, against Parent, Merger Sub, the Company or any of their respective successors or directors (a) challenging the validity of, or seeking to enjoin the operation of, any provision of this Parent Support Agreement or (b) alleging a breach of any fiduciary duty of any Person in connection with the evaluation, negotiation or entry into the Merger Agreement.

  • Legal Action Notice A prompt report of any legal actions pending or threatened in writing against Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries that could result in damages or costs to Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries of, individually or in the aggregate, One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or more; and

  • Litigation There is no action, suit, inquiry, notice of violation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against or affecting the Company, any Subsidiary or any of their respective properties before or by any court, arbitrator, governmental or administrative agency or regulatory authority (federal, state, county, local or foreign) (collectively, an “Action”) which (i) adversely affects or challenges the legality, validity or enforceability of any of the Transaction Documents or the Securities or (ii) could, if there were an unfavorable decision, have or reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary, nor any director or officer thereof, is or has been the subject of any Action involving a claim of violation of or liability under federal or state securities laws or a claim of breach of fiduciary duty. There has not been, and to the knowledge of the Company, there is not pending or contemplated, any investigation by the Commission involving the Company or any current or former director or officer of the Company. The Commission has not issued any stop order or other order suspending the effectiveness of any registration statement filed by the Company or any Subsidiary under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.