Addressed. The Professional School Counselor Observation Report is used by the administrator/supervisor during observation and shared at the post observation conference. During observation, the administrator/supervisor takes notes regarding audience and PSC behavior. It is not necessary to script the entire oral discourse of the PSC; however, the administrator/supervisor should record specific audience behaviors and comments as well as specific PSC behaviors and comments. These notes can be taken separately and then transferred to the PSC Observation Report form.
Addressed competent institution
Addressed. The response and corresponding FS revisions are partially acceptable. See EPA’s evaluation of the CPG’s response to comment #52 above. 57. Appendix D, Section 5.2, Bulleted list after Paragraph 2 Specific 5-2 to 5-3 Delete the bulleted list. This assessment to ranges of PRGs is not a basis to evaluate the recovery of the river. Addressed. The response and corresponding FS revisions are acceptable. 58. Appendix D, Section 5.2, Paragraph 3 Specific 5-3 The text indicates that a diagnostic evaluation will be performed if recovery is not at an acceptable rate. Specify what an acceptable rate is or provide further information as to how this will ultimately be determined. The approach for determining an acceptable rate has been added. The response and corresponding FS revisions are not acceptable. No additional information appears to have been added to further define an acceptable rate. Clarify where this information is or revise the appendix to include it as initially requested. No. Section General or Specific Page No. EPA Region 2 Comment on Draft FS Appendix D CPG Response dated May 21, 2020 EPA Region 2 Evaluation of CPG Response June 26, 2020 59. Appendix D, Section 5.2, Paragraph 4, Sentence 1 Specific 5-3 The text indicates that data analyses may include statistical and graphical representations of recovery. Revise the text to indicate that statistical representations will be given greater weight, as a graphical representation is at best qualitative and may not reveal the true trend. Addressed. The response and corresponding FS revisions are acceptable. 60. Appendix D, Section 5.2, Paragraph 5 Specific 5-3 Include in the text a condition where the models may be assigned a secondary role to the actual empirical data if the models cannot be brought into agreement with observations despite ample data and attempts to refine the models. Specifically, in the second bullet under this paragraph, explain why in the condition where there is an inability to identify agreement between observed conditions and the FWM, a diagnostic evaluation would not be triggered. Addressed. The response and corresponding FS revisions are acceptable. 61. Appendix D, Section 5.3, Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 Specific 5-4 Describe the (or provide examples of what types of) further evaluations of existing data would be conducted at this stage. Addressed. The response and corresponding FS revisions are acceptable. 62. Appendix D, Section 5.3, Paragraph 1 Specific 5-4 In the bulleted list, the...
Addressed. 6.2.2 addressed to the recipient at its address or facsimile number as provided:
Addressed. The response and corresponding FS revisions are partially acceptable. Include in the bulleted list of data collection events under paragraph 2 in Section 2.4 of Appendix D that data would ultimately be collected to verify attainment of RGs and risk- protective conditions. Bullet on long term monitoring added The response and corresponding FS revisions are acceptable. 26. Appendix D, Section 3, Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 Specific 3-1 This sentence implies that PRGs have not been developed simply because the action being considered is an interim action. PRGs have not been developed because risk mitigation is not an explicit goal of the IR. Revise this sentence to convey this concept (e.g., “PRGs are not developed in the IR FS because the goal of the IR is to address higher contaminant concentrations representative of source areas and not specific risks; to this end, and the IR FS develops and compares sediment source control alternatives”).
Addressed. The response and corresponding FS revisions are partially acceptable. Include in the bulleted list of data collection events under paragraph 2 in Section 2.4 of Appendix D that data would ultimately be collected to verify attainment of RGs and risk-protective conditions. No. Section General or Specific Page No. EPA Region 2 Comment on Draft FS Appendix D CPG Response dated May 21, 2020 EPA Region 2 Evaluation of CPG Response June 26, 2020 25. Appendix D, Section 3 Specific 3-1 to 3-4 As noted in Comment #2, revise the Adaptive Management Plan to restructure it around the primary adaptive elements of 1) IR Design and Implementation, 2) System Response, and 3) System Recovery. Also move the information associated with Development of PRGs and Final RGs to instead be a component of the System Recovery adaptive element. When revised, Section 3 should contain discussion of (and tables and figures supporting, as relevant) the IR Design and Implementation adaptive element, centered around the hypotheses/decision questions associated with adequately capturing sediment sources in the IR design and demonstrating attainment of IR RAOs and success/completion of the IR. It should also contain all other related discussion of uncertainties, data needs, potential outcomes, diagnostic assessments, and adaptive responses. Other specific comments below on Section 3 convey revisions that should be made to the information currently contained in Section 3 upon relocating this information to be a component of the System Recovery adaptive element. Addressed. The response and corresponding FS revisions are acceptable. 26. Appendix D, Section 3, Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 Specific 3-1 This sentence implies that PRGs have not been developed simply because the action being considered is an interim action. PRGs have not been developed because risk mitigation is not an explicit goal of the IR. Revise this sentence to convey this concept (e.g., “PRGs are not developed in the IR FS because the goal of the IR is to address higher contaminant concentrations representative of source areas and not specific risks; to this end, and the IR FS develops and compares sediment source control alternatives”).
Addressed. 1.1 3c Double overall Higher Education research income derived from industry to €48m (Innovation 2020 target - €24m in 2014) Addressed:1.2 3d Increase research projects between enterprise and the public research system by 20% by 2020 (2014 Baseline is 878) Addressed: 1.2, 2.1, 2.2
Addressed. 1.1,1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 2.1, 2.2 4d 2.1 2.2 Priority 2 Support CAO entry by students with FETAC awards (11.3% of new entrants in 2016/17) through strong engagement with FE colleges and Education and Training Boards (ETB’s) Increase the number of advanced entry students from Further Education (FE) colleges and other HEIs, focusing on progression opportunities for Level 6 graduates
Addressed. 2.1, 2.2 1.2 Support the education and training needs of professional services staff, including in the context of TU designation
Addressed. If to Scudder Kemper Investments, Inc., to: Scudxxx Xxxxxx Xxxestments, Inc. 345 Park Avxxxx New York, NY 10154 Xxxxxxxxx: Xxxxxxxxx (Facsimile No. 212-319-7813) If to Scudder Investments Singapore Limited, to: Xxxxxer Kemper Singapore Limited 30 Cecil Stxxxx #24-01 Prudential Tower Xxxxxxxxx 049712 Attention: (Facsimile No. ) --------------------- or to such other address as to which the recipient shall have informed the other party. Notice given as provided above shall be deemed to have been given, if by personal delivery, on the day of such delivery, and if by facsimile and mail, the date on which such facsimile and confirmatory letter are sent.
