Table 3 definition

Table 3. Average active subscriber base in a month in the target market Type of STB Active Subscriber base count on the 7th day of the month Active Subscriber base count on the 14th day of the month Active Subscriber base count on the 21st day of the month Active Subscriber base count on the 28th day of the month Average Active Subscriber base in the month (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) = [(2+3+4+5)]/4 Standard Definition STB High Definition STB
Table 3 means Table 3: Disciplinary Actions and Disciplinary Authorities, which follows the Bylaw.
Table 3. VORTEX output data from the baseline model of the Grey Crowned Crane population in KZN, South Africa Parameter Scenario Deterministic growth rate - r‌ Stochastic growth rate - r SD r N-extant SD N-extant Baseline Base -0.0010 0.0380 0.0820 5681.46 345.90 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Year KZN_Base KZN aerial counts Population size Figure 3: A comparison of the output of the baseline model (100 iterations) of the Crey Crowned Crane population in KZN and actual field observations from aerial counts (Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx 2012). Year 01 represents 2001.

Examples of Table 3 in a sentence

  • Each participating state has their own CAB, and the composition of these boards is shown in Table 3.

  • For the measurement of K1 and K2, the correlation coefficients between the IOLMaster 700 and Colombo IOL are 0.99 and 0.98, respectively, as indicated in Table 3.

  • Micro-nutri- ents may also become limiting after N addition as the seem to become diluted by increased biomass production in the NP- treatment (Table 3).

  • The Xxxxxxx’x correlation coefficients between the IOLMaster 700 and Colombo IOL for AL, CCT, K1, and K2 were found to be 0.99, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.98, respectively, indicating a high correlation, as shown in Table 3.

  • At the time of preparing the present participatory methodology, the consortium has already made some plans for the realization of co-creation workshops, as presented in Table 3.


More Definitions of Table 3

Table 3. Material Confirmation Sheet (sample) Date: To: JOGMEC XYZ Company Subject: Material Confirmation SheetPrinting material Used Recyclability ranking Category Manufacturer, product name Note Paper Text X A High quality paper xx paper manufacturing Front cover X A Construction paper xx paper manufacturing Back cover X A High quality paper xx paper manufacturing Covering material Ink X A Flat printing ink xx ink company Processing Binding processing X A PUR Hot melt Surface processing X A OP varnish xx chemicals Other processing Others ↓ Recycling procedures Evaluation Only material from rank A is used May be recycled into printing paper X Only material from ranks A and B are used May be recycled into cardboard Material from ranks C or D are used Unsuitable materials to recycling are used Note:
Table 3. Means of how African Americans compared themselves to “members of the majority race in similar positions” Some items were included in the questionnaire to better understand specific comments that were made during the focus group. For example, respondents were asked, “Do you feel that minorities in the field commu- nicate effectively with each other?” More than half (54.8%) responded “no.” Additionally, 43.3% indicated that they feel that they are treated differently by members of the majority race because of their affiliation with organizations that represent minorities (i.e., Ethnic Minority Society). The majority of the respondents, 83.9%, indicated that they do not feel that minorities are being adequately prepared for management-related posi- tions. Conversely, when asked, “Do you currently feel prepared for a promotion in the field of recreation and parks,” 86.2% indicated yes. Similarly, 83.3% indicated that they did desire another promotion during their career. For those who indicated that they did not want another promotion, the most common reasons were “satisfied with current posi-
Table 3. The information required in respect of: (i) Annex 1A (List of Parties) is provided at Part 2(A) of this Exhibit; (ii) Annex 1B (Description of Transfer) is provided at Part 2(B) of this Exhibit, including by reference to the DPA; (iii) Xxxxx XX (Technical and Organisational Measures) is provided at Part 2(C) of this Exhibit; and
Table 3. Material Confirmation Sheet (sample) Date: To: JOGMEC XYZ Company Subject: Material Confirmation SheetPrinting material Used Recyclability ranking Category Manufacturer, product name Note Paper Text X A High quality paper xx paper manufacturing Front cover X A Construction paper xx paper manufacturing Back cover X A High quality paper xx paper manufacturing Covering material Ink X A Flat printing ink xx ink company Processing Binding processing X A PUR Hot melt Surface processing X A OP varnish xx chemicals Other processing Others ↓ Recycling procedures Evaluation Only material from rank A is used May be recycled into printing paper X Only material from ranks A and B are used May be recycled into cardboard Material from ranks C or D are used Unsuitable materials to recycling are used Notes: Refer to latest “Guidelines for Producing Recyclable Printed Matter, published in Producing Recyclable Printed Matter,” when filled in Material Confirmation Sheet about the printing material. In case of using materials such as paper and ink that recyclability ranking test for used paper is not provided, fill out "Outside the rank" in the column of recyclability ranking.
Table 3. Means of constructs (by project types and geographical locations). By project types
Table 3. Fixed Recovery Charges for Period Ending [________________] FRC Consumer Class ¢ /kWh Residential Domestic Non-CARE Residential Domestic FERA Res/Dom Income Qualified CARE Small C&I (<20kW) GS-1 Traffic Control TC-1 Medium C&I (20 kW – 200 kW) GS-2 Medium C&I (200 kW – 500 kW) XX-0 Xxxxx X&X (Sec) includes standby customers Tou-8-Sec Large C&I (Pri) includes standby customers Tou-8-Pri Large C&I (Sub) includes standby customers Tou-8-Sub Small AG& Pump (< 200 kw) AG&P < 200 KW Large Ag& Pump (≥ 200 kw) AG&P >= 000 XX Xxxxxx/Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Light System
Table 3. Reported o: m: p ratios in reactions of phenyl cation precursors from various precursors with anisole. Reported ratio Precursor Reference 68:13:19 Phenyldiazonium-BF - (hν)a This work 65: 13: 22 1,4-Ditritiobenzene, (β-decay) Ref24 4 56.0: 12.5: 31.5 59:10:31 Phenyldiazonium-BF - (Δ)b 4 Phenyldiazonium-BF - (Δ)c Ref21 4 55.2: 13.4: 31.6 Phenyldiazonium-BF - (Δ)d Ref25