Abstract. 10. The month at which the participant joined the consortium, month 1 marking the start date of the project, and all other start dates being relative to this start date.
Abstract. Seller agrees to deliver to Buyer for its examination an abstract of title covering the above described real estate continued to the date of this Agreement and showing marketable title in Seller in accordance with Iowa Title Standards, subject only to the matters permitted by this Agreement. Upon receipt of the continued abstract Buyer shall have 14 days within which to notify Seller in writing of any objections to title. If no written objections are made within this time then title shall be deemed approved for all purposes under this Agreement. Seller will make reasonable efforts to cure any title exceptions caused by its acts or omissions but will not be obligated to cure any other exceptions.
Abstract. This is a survey of the historical development of the Spectral Xxxx- dard Model and beyond, starting with the ground breaking paper of Xxxxx Xxxxxx in 1988 where he observed that there is a link between Xxxxx fields and finite noncommutative spaces. We present the impor- tant contributions that helped in the search and identification of the noncommutative space that characterizes the fine structure of space- time. The nature and properties of the noncommutative space are arrived at by independent routes and show the uniqueness of the Spec- tral Standard Model at low energies and the Pati–Salam unification model at high energies. 1 Introduction 2 2 Early days of the spectral Standard Model 4
Abstract. At the time of the execution of this Contract, Purchaser acknowledges that the Broker(s) (defined below) have advised and hereby advise Purchaser, by this writing, that Purchaser should have the abstract covering the Property examined by an attorney of Purchaser's own selection or that Purchaser should be furnished with or obtain a policy of title insurance.
Abstract. INTRODUCTION: The development of fully automated immunoassay platforms has improved the technical reliability of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. METHODS: We quantified Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, tTau and pTau levels using the Lumipulse G System in 94 CSF samples from participants of the SPIN cohort with available 18F- Florbetapir imaging. Amyloid scans were assessed visually and through automated quantification. We determined the cutoffs of CSF biomarkers that optimized their agreement with 18F-Florbetapir PET and evaluated concordance between markers of the amyloid category. RESULTS: Aβ1-42, tTau and pTau (but not Aβ1-40) and the ratios with Aβ1-42 had good diagnostic agreement with 18F-Florbetapir PET. As a marker of amyloid pathology, the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio had higher agreement and better correlation with amyloid PET than Aβ1-42 alone. DISCUSSION: CSF biomarkers measured with the Lumipulse G System show good agreement with amyloid imaging. Combination of Aβ1-42 with Aβ1-40 increases the agreement between markers of amyloid pathology.
Abstract. As soon as reasonably possible following the full execution of this Agreement, Seller at its sole cost and expense shall cause to be issued and delivered to Purchaser, abstract of title, or Registered Abstract certified to date to include proper searches covering bankruptcies, and State and Federal judgments and liens. After making that delivery, Seller shall not be obligated for any further updating of the abstracts of title, such further cost to be the sole obligation of the Purchaser.
Abstract. At the time of the execution of this Agreement, Buyer acknowledges that Agent has advised and hereby advises Buyer, by this writing, that Buyer should have the abstract covering the Property examined by an attorney of Buyer's own selection or that Buyer should be furnished with or obtain a policy of title insurance.
Abstract. The information collection is necessary to assess the need for adult education programs in accordance with 25 CFR 46, subpart A, sections 46.20 Program Requirements and 46.30
Abstract. A study of Thomson-Scientific ISI ranked Library and Information Science (LIS) journals (n=52) is reported. The study examined the stances of publishers as expressed in the Copyright Transfer Agreements (CTAs) of the journals, towards self-archiving, the practice of depositing digital copies of one's works in an OAI-compliant open access repository. 62 % (32) do not make their CTAs available on the open web; 38 % (20) do. Of the 38 % that do make CTAs available, two are open access journals. Of the 62 % that do not have a publicly available CTA, 40 % are silent about self- archiving. Even among the 20 journal CTAs publicly available there is a high level of ambiguity. Closer examination augmented by publisher policy documents on copyright, self-archiving, and instructions to authors, reveal that only five, 10% of the ISI-ranked LIS journals in the study, actually prohibit self-archiving by publisher rule. Copyright is a moving target but publishers appear to be acknowledging that copyright and open access can co-exist in scholarly journal publishing. The ambivalence of LIS journal publishers provides unique opportunities to members of the community. Authors can self-archive in open access archives. A society-led global scholarly communication consortium can engage in the strategic building of the LIS information commons. Aggregating OAI- compliant archives and developing disciplinary-specific library services for an LIS commons has the potential to increase the field's research impact and visibility. It may also ameliorate its own scholarly communication and publishing systems and serve as a model for others.
Abstract. The sacred and profane construct is perennial, its allure intuitive, and its reasoning apparently persuasive. The construct evokes an ontological rift between the divine and the mortal, where transfer from one state of being to the other effectively terminates one’s status with the former. Since god is a priori holy (sacred) in being, and the profane is the sphere diametrically and antagonistically against the holy, then the sacred and profane are two contrasted spheres of being. The profane is contrary to the holy—hence, the profane is opposed to god. The construct, however, is contested by the Hebrew Bible. God is the agent and object of the holy, and the agent and object of the profane; god is the one who sanctifies and is sanctified, and the one who profanes and is profaned. The standard semantic and systematic approaches cannot accommodate such evidence in a coherent way; for this would mean god is profaned and thus removed from the state of being holy, and god is sanctified and transferred into the state of being holy. This dissertation challenges the sacred and profane by interrogating the underlying premises in two parts. Part 1 forensically explores the textual and logical challenges by focusing on Leviticus 10:10, the syntax of four continuous ן (“between”) in the versions, and related conceptual issues. Part 2 proposes a categorical shift from ontology to the epistemology of jurisprudence, a hypothesis on the semantic meaning of the four nominals in Leviticus 10:10 and their corresponding verbs in the piel, and a detailed exegesis of two passages where god is the agent of profanation: Psalm 89:31–46 and Isaiah 43:22–28. The study concludes by formulating a coherent proposition on the sanctifying god and the profaning god in the Hebrew Bible. Table of Contents List of Tables vi Abbreviations vii Text-critical Sigla vii Grammatical Abbreviations and Symbols viii Bibles, Dictionaries, and Related Resources viii Series, Journals, etc. xiii
