Budget Overview Sample Clauses

The Budget Overview clause outlines the total financial allocation and spending plan for a project or agreement. It typically details the overall budget amount, major cost categories, and any key assumptions or limitations regarding expenditures. By providing a clear summary of the financial framework, this clause ensures all parties have a shared understanding of the project's funding parameters and helps prevent misunderstandings or disputes over costs.
Budget Overview. The QSA JPA Commission adopts an annual budget for the payment of environmental costs for QSA water transfer mitigation projects in the Imperial Valley. The budget is developed by IID in coordination with the QSA Implementation Team (IT), which consists of CDFW, IID, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The annual budget provides revenues generated from agency contributions and interest earnings to meet anticipated fiscal year (FY) mitigation expenditures. Mitigation projects are implemented by IID under direction from the IT. Specific mitigation measures are implemented per environmental permitting requirements and involve various timeframes for completion. Detailed QSA JPA annual spending through FY 2020 by mitigation task is provided in Appendix 1. The JPA Agreement provides a schedule of annual agency contributions that are due on December 31 of each calendar year. As a means of managing cash flow requirements for future mitigation activities, the JPA Agreement permits agencies to adjust their payment schedules by rescheduling future payments from outer years to the near term. Under the Modification of Payment Schedules Pursuant to the QSA JPA Agreement (Advanced Funding Agreement), advanced payments by the agencies are due on July 1 and are discounted at six percent from the date of the scheduled payment to the date of the advance. The QSA JPA has advanced payments from the original JPA Agreement payment schedules to cover expected environmental mitigation expenses. In 2007, the water agencies modified their payment schedules to advance $13.2 million in FYs 2007 and 2008 to cover mitigation requirements through 2013. In 2015, the Board of Directors of the individual water agencies authorized advanced payments to the QSA JPA totaling $40.5 million, consisting of $10 million from the Water Authority, $5 million from CVWD, and $25.5 million from IID, scheduled over six years beginning in FY 2016. The remaining payments per the 2015 Advanced Funding Agreement are shown in Table 1. 2021 $2,697,555 $2,885,115 $1,500,000 $3,801,632 $10,884,302 $7,191,051 2022 $2,706,745 $3,309,240 $1,517,597 $7,533,582 $10,884,302 2023 $2,733,006 $4,746,284 $1,221,837 $8,701,127 $7,533,582 2024 $151,876 $4,888,673 $1,345,439 $6,385,989 $8,701,127 2025 $565,131 $5,035,333 $1,047,693 $6,648,157 $6,385,989 2026 $5,186,393 $5,186,393 $6,648,157 2027 $5,341,985 $5,341,985 $5,186,393 2028 $5,502,244 $5,502,244 $5,341,985 2029 $5,130,911 $5,130,911 $5,502,244 2030 $5,308...
Budget Overview. Briefly outline how Learning Lab funds (approximately $1 million to $1.5 million) will be used and how other resources may be leveraged including any outside funds or institutional funds. How will you maximize existing structures or resources? Will your innovations place any costs on users? If so, how will these be minimized? (1 page, with more detail allowed as Appendix B, template to be provided by March 1. Please see ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/learninglab/) Note: Learning Lab funds are intended to be used exclusively in California. If the project necessitates the use of Learning Lab funds outside of California, provide a brief justification and estimate of the funding that will leave the state. The amount of funds that can leave the state will be subject to the final award agreement.
Budget Overview. Briefly outline how Learning Lab funds (approximately $1 million to $1.5 million) will be used and how other resources may be leveraged including any outside funds or institutional funds. How will you maximize existing structures or resources? Will your innovations place any costs on users? If so, how will these be minimized? Note: Learning Lab funds are intended to be used exclusively in California. If the project necessitates the use of Learning Lab funds outside of California, provide a brief justification and estimate of the funding that will leave the state. The amount of funds that can leave the state will be subject to the final award agreement.
Budget Overview. As provided above, the Stadium Operation and Maintenance Plan, including the Annual Stadium Operating Budget and a Capital Expenditure Plan, will be adopted annually by the Stadium Authority, provided that, each year, 49ers Stadium Company will have the right to reasonably identify the costs and expenses in the Annual Stadium Operating Budget that will be included in Reimbursable Expenses and, therefore, be subject to 49ers Stadium Company reimbursement. The Annual Stadium Operating Budget will include a projection of the Stadium Operating Revenue (as defined in Article 10 below) and overall Stadium expenses for that year, and will itemize those costs and expenses that will constitute Reimbursable Expenses (i.e., costs and expenses subject to 49ers Stadium Company reimbursement) and those that will constitute Stadium Authority Discretionary Expenses (i.e., costs and expenses not subject to 49ers Stadium Company reimbursement). The Stadium Authority Discretionary Expenses will be paid for by another funding source, such as the Stadium Authority Discretionary Fund, or will not be incurred.
Budget Overview a. Contractor shall use all payments solely in support of the program budget, set forth in the table below. Item No. Line Item Description Flat Fee Rate per Services 1 Evaluation/Intake $450 2 Reassessment $150 2 Group Therapy $56 3 Individual Therapy $129 4 Polygraph $495 6 Administrative Costs (20% of total program costs) $36,280 b. The line item description shall be defined as: (1) Evaluation/Intake: The intake process should be completed within the first 30 days of referral acceptance. The intake should include collecting Client demographic information, conducting comprehensive risk assessments (e.g., Static-99R, STABLE-2007, and clinical evaluations), reviewing criminal history, assessing the Client’s willingness to participate, and gathering information on funding sources and fees. This process is essential for determining the Client’s initial treatment plan. The cost should reflect personnel time for interviews, assessment administration, data entry, and administrative processing.
Budget Overview. Line Item versus Category Changing an Expenditure from a Line Item to a Category Level
Budget Overview. Introduction
Budget Overview. A. Income 1. Donations and Fundraising: SHE IS HOPE LA aims to raise funds through online campaigns, donor contributions, and fundraising events. We anticipate a minimum income of $30,000 from these sources. 2. Corporate Sponsorships: Building partnerships with local businesses and corporations is a priority, with a goal of securing $100,000 in corporate sponsorships.
Budget Overview. Breakdown of Expenses Estimated Costs ($) Estimated Program Reimbursement ($) Expected Costs to Recipient ($)

Related to Budget Overview

  • Project Overview The Developer of this Project is Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., the local electric utility serving the five (5) boroughs of New York City. The Project responds to a Reliability Issue that arose during December of 2011, and February 2012, when Astoria Generating Company, L.P. gave formal notice to the NYS PSC and NYISO of its intent to mothball both Astoria Unit 2 and Astoria Unit #4, respectively. In order to mitigate the Reliability Issue beginning the summer of 2012, the Developer has embarked on an aggressive project schedule to implement the Project. All of the work required will not be completed by summer of 2012, so a two (2) phase approach is being utilized. The Project consists of a transmission connection between the Con Edison 138kV Astoria East Substation and the New York Power Authority’s (NYPA) 345kV Astoria Annex GIS Substation (the “Astoria Annex”). NYPA is the Connecting Transmission Owner, as it is the owner of the Astoria Annex Substation, the Q 35L and Q 35M transmission feeders, and associated shunt reactors, breakers, grounding equipment, fencing and other equipment. The Point of Interconnection for Phase 1 (POI-Phase 1”) of the Project will be at the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Astoria Annex 345 kilovolt (“kV”) Gas Insulated Switchgear (“GIS”) substation (“the Astoria Annex”) between existing circuit breaker R2 and Reactor 2. As part of Phase 1, new relay protection panels and associated equipment, as indicated in figure A-1 are being installed in the Astoria Annex relay rooms, designated as the Line 1 and Line 2 relay panels in their respective relay rooms. The Point of Interconnection for Phase 2 (“POI-Phase 2”) of the Project will be on a permanent basis at the air to GIS bushing on the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Astoria Annex 345 kilovolt (“kV”) GIS, which is between existing circuit breaker 3 and circuit breaker 5, as indicated in figure A-2. Phase 2 includes additional relay protection panels and associated equipment. Upon completion of Phase 2, the relay protection system will be moved to bus section 3-5, and the relay panels installed during Phase 1 will be retired, removed, and replaced by Developer at no cost to the Connecting Transmission Owner. Upon completion of Phase 2, three wood poles, with their cross arms and guide wires will also be removed at no cost to the Connecting Transmission Owner. The Astoria Annex 345kV Substation is an existing indoor GIS design and is configured as a ring bus as shown on Figures A-1 and A-2.

  • Budget Revisions Grantee shall obtain Prior Approval from Grantor whenever a Budget revision is necessary for one or more of the reasons enumerated in 2 CFR 200.308 or 44 Ill. Admin. Code 7000.370(b). All requests for Budget revisions that require Grantor approval shall be signed by Grantee’s authorized representative and submitted to Grantor for approval. Expenditure of funds under a requested revision is prohibited and will not be reimbursed if expended before Grantor gives written approval.