Review Schedule. Information Resource access must be reviewed and updated to reflect changes to operational, business, or IT requirements, based on the following schedules:
Review Schedule. 6.17.2.1 The City Liaison shall notify the School District Liaison by telephone or email within 5 working days of site development plan submittal If the submitted site development plan and reports do not meet the minimum submittal requirements of this Agreement and applicable City Code. If the site development plan is insufficient for review, then the City Liaison shall provide written explanation of the application’s deficiencies. After the submittal of a sufficient and complete application, the City shall have 15 working days to review a site development plan, each subsequent phase of an approved phased site development plan, and accompanying reports, if any, and respond with complete comments from all reviewing city departments to the School District Liaison regarding the site development plan’s compliance with this Agreement. Should complete comments not be returned within said 15 working days, then the City Liaison shall give a written response to the School District with a copy to the City Manager. Said response shall contain a detailed explanation of the reasons for the delay and an accurate timetable for when complete comments regarding the Site Development Plan will be issued.
Review Schedule. 7.2.1.1 The City Liaison shall notify the School District Liaison by telephone or email within 5 working days of receiving a building permit submittal (“Building Permit Application”) if the building permit Application does not meet the minimum submittal requirements of this Agreement and applicable City Code. If the Building Permit Application is insufficient for review, then the City Liaison shall provide written explanation of the application’s deficiencies. After the submittal of a sufficient and complete Building Permit Application, the City shall have 15 working days to review the Building Permit Application and accompanying reports, if any, and respond with complete comments from all reviewing City departments to the School District Liaison regarding the Building Permit Application’s compliance with this Agreement. Should complete comments not be returned within said 15 working days, then the City Liaison shall give a written response to the School District with a copy to the City Manager. Said response shall contain a detailed explanation of the reasons for the delay and an accurate timetable for when complete comments regarding the Building Permit Application will be issued.
Review Schedule. This IPA together with the Care Plan and any other relevant documentation shall be reviewed in accordance with the below review schedule. Date of Initial Assessment: Date of Care Plan: Date of Contract: Date of One Month Review: Date of 6 Month Review: Date of 12 Month Review:
Review Schedule. NAIAO will review each region generally every 3 years but not less than once during any 5-year period. The Pub. L. 93-638 IC Plan will identify the specific regional reviews that will be performed during the current or forthcoming fiscal year, as applicable. NAIAO and the regions shall coordinate the scheduling of reviews.
Review Schedule. 38 Schedule 13E-3......................................................31
Review Schedule. K-H will determine when to communicate completion of physical completion (“PC”) items 1-4 and/or declare PC of items 1-7, based upon its own strategic and business considerations.
Review Schedule. Periodic reviews of the flexible work schedule relating to an employee's work performance must be conducted initially after 3 months and every 6 months thereafter. This documentation should be used in completing the employee's annual performance review. Flexible Work Schedule Agreement Start Date: Flexible Work Schedule Agreement 3 months Review Date: Flexible Work Schedule Agreement 6 months Review Date: Review for work performed outside standard work schedule: Tasks Comments Add 6 month comments on additional sheets.
Review Schedule. Beginning in the Fall term of the 2020 - 2021 Academic Year, new Adjuncts will begin the mini-portfolio review process in the first semester in which they teach. This process will include a classroom observation or observations to be conducted by the appropriate Associate Xxxx or designee. The Pathway Academic Xxxx will finalize the mini-portfolio review for the academic year. The next review cycle will occur every three (3) years after the conclusion of the first-year evaluation. During the review cycle classroom observations will be conducted. The appropriate Academic Pathway Xxxx may determine that an Adjunct must be evaluated in as many consecutive years as necessary and will inform the Adjunct that a mini-portfolio Review must be completed. Adjuncts will receive information about the requirements of the mini-portfolio from the appropriate Associate Xxxx or designee via email correspondence. If an Adjunct wishes to have guidance in constructing the mini-portfolio, he/she may attend a workshop set up for this purpose through the College’s CTEL (Center for Teaching Excellence and Learning) and/or consult with a discipline colleague or mentor or appropriate administrator. An Adjunct will submit the mini-portfolio to his/her immediate supervisor by the scheduled deadline. The Associate Xxxx or designee will review each mini-portfolio, make written comments, and sign off on the mini-portfolio. A copy of the mini-portfolio review form will be kept by the Associate Xxxx or designee, and a copy will be sent to the appropriate Academic Pathway Xxxx. The original form will be added to the mini-portfolio for return to the Adjunct Faculty. The mini-portfolios will be returned to the Adjunct by the designated deadline. Adjuncts teaching online will follow the same process, but their mini-portfolios will be submitted electronically to their BC Online supervisor. Those teaching both online and ground courses may choose which type of mini-portfolio to submit.
Review Schedule. This action plan will be reviewed if: • The relevant legislation and regulation changes • The HBP enters a new SGA • On request of the EC or its reviewers • On receipt of information that substantially alters the way in which the issues are identified or addressed.
