Portfolio Evaluation Sample Clauses

Portfolio Evaluation. All prices and values used for the purpose of calculating the unit value of any Fund are obtained from the Custodian or from a fund administrator, and/or such other third party as reasonably selected by the Manager. The Custodian or Fund administrator shall, if applicable, in good faith determine the market value of assets in the Investment Portfolio.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Portfolio Evaluation. The Bank shall compute and, unless otherwise directed by the Board, determine as of the close of business on the New York Stock Exchange on each day on which said Exchange is open for unrestricted trading and as of such other hours, if any, as may be authorized by the Board the net asset value and the public offering price of a share of capital stock of each Portfolio of the Trust, such determination to be made in accordance with the provisions of the Articles and By-laws of the Trust and Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information relating to each Portfolio and the Trust, as they may from time to time be amended, and any applicable resolutions of the Board at the time in force and applicable; and promptly to notify the Trust and the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") or such other persons as the Trust may request of the results of such computation and determination. In computing the net asset value hereunder, the Bank may rely in good faith upon information furnished to it by any Authorized Person in respect of (i) the manner of accrual of the liabilities of each Portfolio of the Trust and in respect of liabilities of any Portfolio of the Trust not appearing on its books of account kept by the Bank, (ii) reserves, if any, authorized by the Board or that no such reserves have been authorized, (iii) the source of the quotations to be used in computing the net asset value, (iv) the value to be assigned to any security for which no price quotations are available, and (v) the method of computation of the public offering price on the basis of the net asset value of the shares, and the Bank shall not be responsible for any loss occasioned by such reliance on any quotations received from a source pursuant to (iii) above.
Sample 1Sample 2
Portfolio Evaluation. Not earlier than twenty-four (24) months prior to the expiration of this Agreement, Co-Brand Partner may notify FNBO in writing of Co-Brand Partner’s intent to evaluate the Card portfolio (the “Evaluation Notice”). An Evaluation Notice may also be delivered by Co-Brand Partner within thirty (30) days following a notice by either FNBO or Co-Brand Partner of a termination which will trigger the Purchase Option pursuant to Section 3.7. Within fifteen (15) business days following the timely issuance of an Evaluation Notice, FNBO shall provide Co-Brand Partner with aggregate portfolio level information for Co-Brand Partner to include in an RFP for the purpose of permitting Networks to evaluate, and potential purchasers to adequately determine their interest in bidding upon, the Card portfolio (the “RFP Data”). Such RFP Data shall include aggregate portfolio level information and KPI’s for the previous two (2) years broken out by year. If more than one potential purchaser requests additional information regarding the Card portfolio customary for this type of transaction, FNBO will provide to Co-Brand Partner such additional information in a timely manner. Prior to any RFP Data or other information being provided pursuant to this Section 2, FNBO shall be entitled to require any potential purchaser and such potential purchaser’s advisors and representatives to enter into commercially reasonable confidentiality arrangements with FNBO that covers the RFP Data and other information supplied by FNBO under this Section 2. Such confidentiality arrangements shall be substantially as protective as the confidentiality provisions set forth in Section 7 of the Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Portfolio Evaluation. 20 13. Concerning the Bank...............................................20 13.1 Performance of Duties; Standard of Care.....................20 13.2 Agents and Subcustodians....................................22 13.3 Insurance...................................................22 13.4 Fees and Expenses of Bank...................................22 13.5 Advances by Bank............................................23 14. Termination.......................................................23 15. Confidentiality...................................................24 16. Notices...........................................................25
Sample 1
Portfolio Evaluation. The Bank shall compute and determine as of such days and hours, as may be authorized by the Board, the net asset value and the offering price of shares of each Portfolio, such determination to be made in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Declaration and By-Laws and Registration Statement of the Trust relating to the Portfolios, as it may from time to time be amended, and any applicable resolutions of the Board at the time in force and applicable; and promptly to notify the Trust, any applicable exchange, the NASD or such other persons as the Trust may request of the results of such computation and determination. In computing the net asset value hereunder, the Bank may rely in good faith upon information that the Bank reasonably believes to be accurate and reliable furnished to it by any Authorized Person in respect of (i) the manner of accrual of the liabilities of each Portfolio and in respect of liabilities of a Portfolio not appearing on its books of account kept by the Bank, (ii) reserves, if any, authorized by the Board or that no such reserves have been authorized, (iii) the source of the quotations to be used in computing the net asset value, (iv) the value to be assigned to any security for which no price quotations are available, and (v) the method of computation of the offering price on the basis of the net asset value of the shares, and the Bank shall not be responsible for any loss occasioned by its reasonable and good faith reliance on any quotations received from a source pursuant to (iii) above.
Sample 1
Portfolio Evaluation. A stipend of $75 shall be provided for each portfolio evaluated by faculty.
Sample 1

Related to Portfolio Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Trust Evaluation As of the Evaluation Time (a) on the last Business Day of each year, (b) on the day on which any Unit is tendered for redemption and (c) on any other day desired by the Trustee or requested by the Depositor, the Trustee shall: Add (i) all moneys on deposit in a Trust (excluding (1) cash, cash equivalents or Letters of Credit deposited pursuant to Section 2.01 hereof for the purchase of Contract Securities, unless such cash or Letters of Credit have been deposited in the Interest and Principal Accounts because of failure to apply such moneys to the purchase of Contract Securities pursuant to the provisions of Sections 2.01, 3.03 and 3.04 hereof and (2) moneys credited to the Reserve Account pursuant to Section 3.05 hereof), plus (ii) the aggregate Evaluation of all Securities (including Contract Securities and Reinvestment Securities) on deposit in such Trust as is determined by the Evaluator (such evaluations shall take into account and itemize separately (i) the cash on hand in the Trust or moneys in the process of being collected from matured interest coupons or bonds matured or called for redemption prior to maturity, (ii) the value of each issue of the Securities in the Trust on the bid side of the market as determined by the Evaluator pursuant to Section 4.01, and (iii) interest accrued thereon not subject to collection and distribution). For each such Evaluation there shall be deducted from the sum of the above (i) amounts representing any applicable taxes or governmental charges payable out of the respective Trust and for which no deductions shall have previously been made for the purpose of addition to the Reserve Account, (ii) amounts representing estimated accrued fees of the Trust and expenses of such Trust including but not limited to unpaid fees and expenses of the Trustee, the Evaluator, the Supervisor, the Depositor and bond counsel, in each case as reported by the Trustee to the Evaluator on or prior to the date of evaluation, (iii) any moneys identified by the Trustee, as of the date of the Evaluation, as held for distribution to Unitholders of record as of a Record Date or for payment of the Redemption Value of Units tendered prior to such date and (iv) unpaid organization costs in the estimated amount per Unit set forth in the Prospectus. The resulting figure is herein called a "Trust Fund Evaluation." The value of the pro rata share of each Unit of the respective Trust determined on the basis of any such evaluation shall be referred to herein as the "Unit Value."

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.