Drug Utilization Review Sample Clauses

Drug Utilization Review. Compliance with Formularies and Provider ----------------------------------------------------------------- Manual. Provider shall (1) cooperate with ESI's procedures for drug ------ utilization review and generic substitution, as set forth from time to time in the Provider Manual; (2) comply with ESI's procedures for calling prescribers to facilitate generic substitution and Formulary compliance, and other programs established by a Sponsor; and (3) comply with the Provider Manual. Provider shall use commercially reasonable efforts to comply with the applicable Formulary when dispensing Covered Medications to Members. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in no event will Provider (i) attempt to switch a Member's prescription to a drug that is not a Formulary drug on the applicable Formulary, except for generic substitution opportunities or where required by medical necessity. Provider agrees that ESI's manufacturer agreements, therapeutic programs and formularies take precedence with the manufacturers over any such agreements or programs to which Provider is a party with respect to Covered Medications dispensed to Members. Provider will not implement any substitution program for Members of Prescription Drug Programs that is inconsistent with such Prescription Drug Program, including the applicable Formulary.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Drug Utilization Review. The Health Plan shall design and implement a drug utilization review (DUR) program designed to encourage coordination between an enrollee’s primary care physician and a prescriber of a psychotropic or similar prescription drug for behavioral health problems. The Health Plan’s DUR program shall identify those medications for other serious medical conditions (such as hypertension, diabetes, neurological disorders, or cardiac problems), where this is a significant risk to the enrollee posed by potential drug interactions between drugs for these conditions and behavioral-related drugs. After the Health Plan identifies the potential for such problems, the Health Plan’s DUR program shall notify all related prescribers that certain drugs may be contra-indicated due to the potential for drug interactions and shall encourage the prescribers to coordinate their care. Notice may be provided electronically or via mail, or by telephonic or direct consultation, as the Health Plan deems appropriate. AHCA Contract No. FA905, Attachment II, Page 88 of 186 HealthEase of Florida, Inc. Medicaid HMO Non-Reform Contract
Drug Utilization Review. The Health Plan shall design and implement a drug utilization review (DUR) program designed to encourage coordination between an enrollee’s primary care physician and a prescriber of a psychotropic or similar prescription drug for behavioral health problems. The Health Plan’s DUR program shall identify those medications for other serious medical conditions (such as hypertension, diabetes, neurological disorders, or cardiac problems), where this is a significant risk to the enrollee posed by potential drug interactions between drugs for these conditions and behavioral-related drugs. After the AHCA Contract No. FA971, Attachment II, Page 98 of 285 WellCare of Florida, Inc., Medicaid HMO Non-Reform Contract d/b/a Staywell Health Plan of Florida Health Plan identifies the potential for such problems, the Health Plan’s DUR program shall notify all related prescribers that certain drugs may be contra-indicated due to the potential for drug interactions and shall encourage the prescribers to coordinate their care. Notice may be provided electronically or via mail, or by telephonic or direct consultation, as the Health Plan deems appropriate.
Drug Utilization Review. For all populations eligible for covered services under this Contract, the Contractor shall:
Drug Utilization Review. Benecard will review both concurrently and retrospectively Claims for potential fraud, waste, abuse, and clinical appropriateness. Claims are reviewed daily from the previous day to ensure such Claims are being prescribed based on clinically appropriate and FDA approved guidelines, including but not limited to, duplicate therapy, refill too soon, gender appropriate, age appropriate, cost and quantities. Fraud, waste and abuse Claims are also reviewed retrospectively each calendar quarter, reported and tracked until resolution of the case is completed and when applicable, notified to the Group.
Drug Utilization Review. CHLIC shall perform a concurrent Drug Utilization Review (“DUR”) analysis of each prescription submitted for processing, which may include: (1) prescribed dosage within a safe range; (2) drug-to-drug interaction; (3) drug-to- allergy interaction; (4) age-to-drug interaction; (5) duplicate therapy; (6) quantity limitations; and (7) days' supply.CHLIC's DUR processes shall not override or substitute for the prescriber's, the pharmacist's or other health care provider's professional judgment. 4.
Drug Utilization Review. Both parties agree to maintain and participate in, the Drug Utilization Management Program. This program shall be administered in accordance with applicable Benefit Program requirements and shall include medication therapy management programs.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Drug Utilization Review. Xxxxx will provide concurrent drug utilization review services through edits applied during Claims Processing in order to assist the dispensing pharmacist and prescribing physician in identifying potential drug interactions, incorrect prescriptions or dosages, and certain other circumstances that may be indicative of inappropriate prescription drug usage. Xxxxx’x utilization review services are not intended to substitute for the professional judgment of the prescriber, the dispensing pharmacist or any other health care professional providing services to the Member. Client or its third party designee (as applicable) will have the final responsibility for all decisions with respect to coverage of a Claim and the benefits allowable under the Plan, including determining whether any rejected or disputed claim will be allowed.

Related to Drug Utilization Review

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Design Review Consumer shall provide Holy Cross an electrical one-line diagram and a relaying and metering one-line diagram prior to completion of detailed designs, unless the Consumer is installing a packaged system that is pre-certified to IEEE 1547.1 and UL 1741 standards. Packaged systems pre-certified under IEEE Standard 1547.1 and UL Standard 1741 will not require a relaying and metering one-line diagram. The submitted application and diagrams will be processed, reviewed, and acted upon in accordance with the Holy Cross Interconnection Policy.

  • Midterm Review The Recipient shall:

  • Random Drug Testing All employees covered by this Agreement shall be subject to random drug testing in accordance with Appendix D.

  • Compliance Review During the Term, Developer agrees to permit the GLO, HUD, and/or a designated representative of the GLO or HUD to access the Property for the purpose of performing Compliance-Monitoring Procedures. In accordance with GLO Compliance-Monitoring Procedures, the GLO or HUD will periodically monitor and audit Developer’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, the CDBG-DR Regulations, the CDBG Multifamily Rental Housing Guidelines, and any and all other Governmental Requirements during the Term. In conducting any compliance reviews, the GLO or HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from Developer’s records and reports, on-site monitoring, and audit reports. The GLO or HUD may also consider other relevant information gained from other sources, including litigation and citizen complaints. Attachment G GLO Contract No. 20-063-039-C547 5.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: INDEMNIFICATION

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.