Audits or reviews Sample Clauses

Audits or reviews.  The results of any audits or reviews of Ore Reserve estimates.  No audits carried out.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Audits or reviews. In addition to the independent audit contemplated by Section 4(i), below, upon not less than 10 days’ notice from the AF-CH-HH Group to the Management Company, and at the sole cost and expense of the AF-CH-HH Group, the Management Company shall cooperate and furnish the AF-CH-HH Group or its designees with any and all information necessary to perform and complete any and all audits or review procedures deemed necessary by the AF-CH-HH Group, in the AF-CH-HH Group’s reasonable discretion, to determine the accuracy and correctness of the accounting and internal controls performed and maintained by the Management Company; provided, however that any such designee of the AF-CH-HH Group shall not be a direct or substantial competitor of the Management Company or any of its member AF-CH-HH Groups. Any such audit or review shall be conducted at such time and in such fashion so as to avoid undue disruption of the Management Company’s business operations.
Sample 1
Audits or reviews. The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No independent audit or review has been undertaken.
Sample 1
Audits or reviews. Review work undertaken in relation to the mineral resource estimate has included visual review of cross-sections comparing blocks to down hole grades. Populations of grades, composites and blocks and their general distribution have been reviewed to ensure no bias in estimation. In addition, confirmatory drilling has been conducted which reasonably supports the predictions made by the block model. Third party auditors have also inspected the cross-sections and mineral resource findings without issue. Discussion of relative • Accuracy and variability have been assessed through visual review of cross-sections, accuracy/confidence comparing blocks to drill hole grades. • This mineral resource estimation has reasonable global reliability but local variability is subject to the nugget effect observed in variography. It is the Competent Person’s opinion that indicated and inferred mineral resources are of sufficient reliability to support scoping level economic analysis and make preliminary mining plans. • No production data are available. In Solid Kriging Error Search Radius Min Points Anisotropy Primary: Tertiary High Park Deposit Measured Yes <1.3 160 4 3:1 Indicated Yes <1.3 320 8 3:1 Inferred A Yes >1.3 500 8 3:1 Xxxxxx and Picnic Tree Deposit Indicated Yes <2.1 300 4 16:1 Inferred A Yes >2.1 500 4 16:1 Xxxxxx Ranch and Xxxxx Deposit Indicated Yes <1.3 320 8 3:1 Inferred A Yes >1.3 500 8 3:1 Competent Person’s Consent Form Pursuant to the requirements of ASX Listing Rules 5.6, 5.22 and 5.24 and Clause 9 of the JORC Code 2012 Edition (Written Consent Statement)
Sample 1
Audits or reviews.  The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. None completed. JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status  Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.  The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Private surface and mineral ownership exist at Xxxxxx Ridge. Metals of Americas, LLC has entered into mineral leases over the surface and mineral rights to the Xxxxxx Ridge Zinc Project. The Company has entered into a Binding Exclusivity Agreement to potentially to acquire 100% of issued capital in Metals of Americas, LLC. There are no known material issues affecting the mineral leases. All tenements have been legally validated by a land manager to confirm title to the relevant surface and mineral rights. Exploration done by other parties  Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Cominco American Resources Incorporated initially conducted exploration at Xxxxxx Ridge. Cominco discovered the prospect in 1983 during a grass-roots exploration program. They drilled 8 holes on the property, but terminated their lease agreements by the end of 1986. 6 of those drill holes were collared within 250m of the summit of Xxxxxx Xxxx, on the downdip extent of the gossan. Between 1994-1996, Xxxxxx Dodge drilled an additional 13 holes in the Xxxxxx Ridge vicinity. This work was followed by exploration and minimal drilling conducted by Xxxxxx Ridge, LLC (2 holes) and MMG (2 holes) between 2013-2016. While only limited exploration has been conducted at Xxxxxx Ridge, significant Pb, Zn, and Ag intercepts have resulted. Furthermore, significant mineralized drill intercepts confirm the sedex model at Xxxxxx Ridge. Geology  Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. The Xxxxxx Ridge prospect shows similarities to the Xxxxxxxx Deposit (> 160 Mt of ore grading 12% combined Pb and Zn, and +2 ounce Ag), in its tectonic and time- stratigraphic settings. The Xxxxxxxx deposit in British Columbia is hosted by Proterozoic clastic sediments of the Xxxxxxxx/Xxxxxxxx Formation, the basal portion of the Bel...
Sample 1
Audits or reviews. The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • The recent drilling has not been independently reviewed except by Mining One who are responsible for the resource estimation process.
Sample 1
Audits or reviews. The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • Not Applicable
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Audits or reviews

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Prior Review (a) With respect to each contract for the employment of consulting firms estimated to cost the equivalent of $100,000 or more, the procedures set forth in paragraphs 2, 3 and 5 of Appendix 1 to the Consultant Guidelines shall apply.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Vendor must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS We may provide you areas on the Site to leave reviews or ratings. When posting a review, you must comply with the following criteria:

  • Annual Reviews The Recipient shall:

  • Audits No more than once a year, or following unauthorized access, upon receipt of a written request from the LEA with at least ten (10) business days’ notice and upon the execution of an appropriate confidentiality agreement, the Provider will allow the LEA to audit the security and privacy measures that are in place to ensure protection of Student Data or any portion thereof as it pertains to the delivery of services to the LEA . The Provider will cooperate reasonably with the LEA and any local, state, or federal agency with oversight authority or jurisdiction in connection with any audit or investigation of the Provider and/or delivery of Services to students and/or LEA, and shall provide reasonable access to the Provider’s facilities, staff, agents and XXX’s Student Data and all records pertaining to the Provider, LEA and delivery of Services to the LEA. Failure to reasonably cooperate shall be deemed a material breach of the DPA.

  • Audit Notwithstanding any other audit requirement, H-GAC reserves the right to conduct or cause to be conducted an independent audit of any transaction under this Agreement, such audit may be performed by the H-GAC local government audit staff, a certified public accountant firm, or other auditors designated by H-GAC and will be conducted in accordance with applicable professional standards and practices. The Contractor understands and agrees that the Contractor shall be liable to the H-GAC for any findings that result in monetary obligations to H-GAC.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.