Review Team Conference Clause Samples
Review Team Conference. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. All team members meet to discuss the results of the syllabi, self- study, workstation observations (if conducted), the review of professional responsibilities, administrative documentation, and the student review forms, and use the same Procedures as in A.
Review Team Conference. The review team will meet to jointly determine the performance rating of the adjunct faculty member under review using the syllabi, self-study, student review forms, workstation observations, administrative documentation, and the review of professional responsibilities. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. Performance review forms, including written recommendations, will be completed at this time. The team must justify, in writing, any less than satisfactory rating and any recommendation for a regular review in less than three (3) years. If the Area ▇▇▇▇ and the faculty member fail to reach an agreement on the faculty member’s overall performance in the review, an additional faculty member shall be appointed by the Academic Senate President (or designee). The additional faculty member appointed to the team will review all written material, discuss relevant issues with the review team and faculty member under review, and has the option of conducting a workstation observation if time permits before the end of the semester. The newly appointed faculty member to the team shall be the deciding vote in the review. The majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached.
Review Team Conference. All team members meet to discuss the results of the syllabi, self-study, workstation observations, the review of professional responsibilities, administrative documentation, and the student review forms. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. Performance review forms including written recommendations will be completed at this time. The team decides whether to recommend continuation of the tenure-track contract (for first and second year tenure-track faculty). The team meets in the fall semester for fourth-year tenure-track faculty to consider whether or not to recommend to the College President that tenure be granted. While the team will meet at the end of year three, no specific tenure recommendation may be made. If the team members do not agree on the review, the majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached. The Area ▇▇▇▇ or appropriate administrator will be responsible for enforcing timelines. Failure on the part of the team to meet its obligations will invoke the provisions of paragraph 8.6.1.2.6.
Review Team Conference. The review team will meet to jointly determine the performance rating as in Procedure A. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference.
Review Team Conference. All team members meet to discuss the results of the syllabi, workstation observations, the review of professional responsibilities, administrative documentation, and the student review forms. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. Performance review forms, including written recommendations, will be completed at this time. If the team members do not agree on the review, the majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached. A majority
Review Team Conference. All team members meet to discuss the results of the syllabi, workstation observations, the review of professional responsibilities, administrative documentation, and the student review forms. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. Performance review forms, including written recommendations, will be completed at this time. If the team members do not agree on the review, the majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached. A majority of the team must justify, in writing, any recommendation for a review in less than three (3) years. Failure on the part of the team to meet its obligation will invoke the provisions of Section 8.7.
Review Team Conference. All team members meet to discuss the results of the syllabi, self-study, workstation observations (if conducted), the review of professional responsibilities, administrative documentation, and the student review forms, and use the same Procedures as in A.
Review Team Conference. All team members meet to discuss the results of the syllabi, workstation observations, the review of professional responsibilities, administrative documentation, and the student review forms. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. Performance review forms, including written recommendations, will be completed at this time. If the team members do not agree on the review, the majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached. A majority of the team must justify, in writing, any recommendation for a review in less than three (3) years. Failure on the part of the team to meet its obligation will invoke Deleted: This reflection is intended to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ a conversation and to facilitate discussion among colleagues that reflects on how faculty can individually and collectively work to improve student outcomes for historically under- represented groups and disproportionately impacted populations. The reflection should be used to help advance individual professional development and institutional dialogue on change.¶ c The reflection document must not be used as evidence to support a less than satisfactory rating; however, nothing in the reflection process shall limit a performance review team's ability to address a faculty member's less than satisfactory performance issues utilizing evidence or information consistent with Section 8.15.1.2. Deleted: 8.7.3.1.c.1c Effective July 1, 2023, equity reflection will be incorporated as part of the 2023-2026 collective bargaining agreement, unless either party indicates, in writing, its desire to modify or eliminate the statement. ¶ However, the return of student reviews will be collected throughout the overall timeline and used for the performance review. Original individual student review forms will be returned to the faculty after grades have been submitted; the District may maintain copies no longer than one (1) semester or until a grievance has been resolved. the provisions of Section 8.7.2.2.4. A majority of the team must justify, in writing, any less than satisfactory rating and any recommendation for a Procedure A review in three (3) years or less.
Review Team Conference. The review team will meet to jointly determine the performance rating of the adjunct faculty member under review using the syllabi, self-study, student review forms, workstation observations, administrative documentation, and the review of professional responsibilities. Performance review forms, including written recommendations, will be completed at this time. The team must justify, in writing, any less than satisfactory rating and any recommendation for a regular review in less than three (3) years. If the Area ▇▇▇▇ and the faculty member fail to reach an agreement on the faculty member’s overall performance in the review, an additional faculty member shall be appointed by the Academic Senate President (or designee). The additional faculty member appointed to the team will review all written material, discuss relevant issues with the review team and faculty member under review, and has the option of conducting a workstation observation if time permits before the end of the semester. The newly appointed faculty member to the team shall be the deciding vote in the review. The majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached.