Common use of Review Team Conference Clause in Contracts

Review Team Conference. The review team will meet to jointly determine the performance rating of the adjunct faculty member under review using the syllabi, self-study, student review forms, workstation observations, administrative documentation, and the review of professional responsibilities. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. Performance review forms, including written recommendations, will be completed at this time. The team must justify, in writing, any less than satisfactory rating and any recommendation for a regular review in less than three (3) years. If the Area Xxxx and the faculty member fail to reach an agreement on the faculty member’s overall performance in the review, an additional faculty member shall be appointed by the Academic Senate President (or designee). The additional faculty member appointed to the team will review all written material, discuss relevant issues with the review team and faculty member under review, and has the option of conducting a workstation observation if time permits before the end of the semester. The newly appointed faculty member to the team shall be the deciding vote in the review. The majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached.

Review Team Conference. The review team will meet to jointly determine the performance rating of the adjunct faculty member under review using the syllabi, self-study, student review forms, workstation observations, administrative documentation, and the review of professional responsibilities. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. Performance review forms, including written recommendations, will be completed at this time. The team must justify, in writing, any less than satisfactory rating and any recommendation for a regular review in less than three (3) years. If the Area Xxxx and the faculty member fail to reach an agreement on the faculty member’s overall performance in the review, an additional faculty member shall be appointed by the Academic Senate President (or designee). The additional faculty member appointed to the team will review all written material, discuss relevant issues with the review team and faculty member under review, and has the option of conducting a workstation observation if time permits before the end of the semester. The newly appointed faculty member to the team shall be the deciding vote in the review. The majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached.

Review Team Conference. The review team will meet to jointly determine the performance rating of the adjunct faculty member under review using the syllabi, self-studystudy if required, student review forms, workstation observations, administrative documentation, and the review of professional responsibilities. All elements of the performance review must be completed prior to the review team conference. Performance review forms, including written recommendations, will be completed at this time. The team must justify, in writing, any less than satisfactory rating and any recommendation for a regular review in less than three (3) years. If the Area Xxxx and the faculty member fail to reach an agreement on the faculty member’s overall performance in the review, an additional faculty member shall be appointed by the Academic Senate President (or designee). The additional faculty member appointed to the team will review all written material, discuss relevant issues with the review team and faculty member under review, and has the option of conducting a workstation observation if time permits before the end of the semester. The newly appointed faculty member to the team shall be the deciding vote in the review. The majority recommendation will prevail; however, a minority opinion may be attached.