Proposed targets for FY2 Sample Clauses

Proposed targets for FY2. LLIN Distribution in the remaining 9 (nine) provinces will be divided in 2 phases: o Phase 2: Oct-Nov 2017: Namibe and Cunene o Phase 3: Mai-Jul 2018 (after the rainy season): Cabinda, Bie, Bengo, Lunda Norte, Lunda Sul, Moxico and Cuando Cubango. Huambo might be included later.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed targets for FY2. Implementing Mechanism 18347_HFA Indicator Code Frequency of Reporting COP17 Target HTC_TST Quarterly 43,845 HTC_TST_POS Quarterly 5,843 TX_NEW Quarterly 7,543 TX_CURR Quarterly 22,003 TX_TB Num Semi-Annual 918 TX_TB Den Semi-Annual 18,615 TB_Prev Num Semi-Annual 1,954 TB_Prev Den Semi-Annual 2,836 TB_STAT Num Semi-Annual 4,005 TB_STAT Den Semi-Annual 4,682 TB_ART Num Semi-Annual 673 TB_ART Den Semi-Annual 750 TX_RET Num Annual 4,027 TX_RET Den Annual 5,035 TX_PVLS Den Annual 11,513 To achieve the targets for FY2 (2018), MSH designed the Process Model (below), which includes five strategic processes and five transversal support processes. This model covers the entire set of activities of the Continuum of Care (COC) in the seven HUs assigned to HFA. They are: Testing, Linking to Care and treatment, Retention and Adherence to ART, Viral Load Suppression, and TB Screening and Diagnosis (New & relapsed). It also includes five processes of support to COC activities. They are: Improve the health HIV/AIDS quality services; Surveillance of data quality; Patients referral and response system; Visibility and Communication and Supervision. In addition to the Process Model, HFA/MSH is scaling up Index Case Testing and Tracing from three Health Units (Viana, Rangel y Divina) to all seven HUs assigned to HFA (new sites include Kilamba, Dispensario, Xxxxxxxxx, and Pediatrico). This will increase the numbers of HIV+ persons identified and consequently will increase the entire cascade of care.
Sample 1
Proposed targets for FY2. Finance and Governance Strengthening In FY2, HFA will start the implementation of cross-cutting activities at the local level to support specific interventions related with malaria, HIV and family planning/reproductive health at provincial and municipal levels. USAID Angola has recommended the involvement of the provincial and municipal health authorities DPS (Provincial Directory of Health) and DMS (Municipal Directory of Health). HFA has defined four big processes to be implemented in FY2, but the most important will be to focus on the outputs or deliverables expected: 10 municipal annual plans and budgets, 2 provincial annual plans and budgets, M&E plans and management capacities of NMCP improved. • Annual operating plans capacities improved at selected DMS (Municipal Directory of Health) As per MOH–GEPE (Studies, Planning and Statistic Cabinet) request to USAID, HFA will provide training and technical assistance with the planning tools currently used by other partners, like the Europe Union and The World Bank Projects. The municipal AOPs will incorporate HFA’s focus areas to provide sustainability and continuous support to all selected areas, like malaria, HIV, and FP services. • Strengthening budget capacities at selected DMS HFA will provide technical assistance to strengthen budget management capacities at the municipal and provincial level. Since budget ceilings probably will not be increased and may potentially be reduced, the best thing that can be done at the municipal and provincial level is to improve the control of the resources allocated to each entity. HFA will conduct provincial workshops (in Zaire and Lunda Sul) with the ten municipalities and two provinces to carry out budgets. In the process of development of municipal and provincial budgets, HFA will guarantee involvement of at least four municipal technicians from each RMS, totaling 48 officials to be trained on budget formulation and implementation of financial best practices. This training process and technical assistance will help prepare the municipal teams for the development of the Public Budget for Year 2019. HFA will implement, at the end of the process, a session to share the Municipal Budget results with provincial, municipal, and MOH– GEPE authorities. • Strengthening monitoring capacities at selected DMS In FY2, HFA will develop tools to oversee both municipal Annual Operational Plans (AOPs) and budgets to implement a process of strengthening local capabilities at municipa...
Sample 1

Related to Proposed targets for FY2

  • Table 7b - Other milestones and targets Reference Number Select stage of the lifecycle Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum)

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving IDLC 2.16.1 Where TWTC has requested an Unbundled Loop and AT&T uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the customer and AT&T has a suitable alternate facility available, AT&T will make such alternative facilities available to TWTC. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, AT&T will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for TWTC (e.g., hairpinning):

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones:

  • Desirable Selection Criteria 1. Possession of, or significant progression toward the attainment of a post graduate qualification in area of specialty.

  • Promotional Criteria Subject to the utilisation of the skills, as required by the Employer, an employee remains at this level until he/she has developed the skills to allow the employee to effectively perform the tasks required of this function and is assessed to be competent to perform effectively at a higher level or has successfully completed appropriate training to ASF level 1 and has the demonstrated skills to perform at a higher level. An employee must be prepared to undertake appropriate training. LEVEL 3

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.