Impact and ambition. Short-term effects: Improved capacity of tax authorities through common working practices, collaborative inputs to policy development, and reinforced competences. Medium term effect: ⮚ Coherent tax policy and implementation of Union law relating to the field of taxation. ⮚ Fostered operational tax cooperation between national authorities. ⮚ Improved functioning and operations of tax authorities. Long-term effect: ⮚ Financial and economic interests of the Union and its MS protected. ⮚ Enhanced functioning of the single market. ⮚ Fostered Union competitiveness and fair competition in the Union. Target Groups: Tax administrations/authorities as defined by the Fiscalis Programme Regulation Impact and ambition Define the short, medium and long-term effects of the project. Who are the target groups? How will the target groups benefit concretely from the project and what would change for them? Does the project aim to trigger change/innovation? If so, describe them and the degree of ambition (progress beyond the status quo). The Fiscalis programme Regulation allows for the direct engagement of third (non-EU) countries. The countries becoming the beneficiaries of the programme will have a direct insight on the policy and legal evolutions of tax policy and gain knowledge of the EU Member States’ experience and the support of the Commission through participating in the programme activities and having direct access to the non- sensitive/confidential outputs/results of the activities. In case of the candidate countries and the potential candidates, these aspects contribute to the accession process and support the assimilation of the Union acquis. Third (non-EU) countries may benefit from the collaboration opportunities allowing for building trust and mutually increasing knowledge by sharing know- how and human network building. Impact on non-EU countries Please specify which country(ies) benefit from the project. Why is the project important for those country(ies)? How does it improve the situation the country(ies)?
Impact and ambition. Standards for Research Publications (SRP) will be a product or innovation of a project consortium. This will strongly influence the change of the existing market (product of market change) which has become a monopoly by Clarivate Analytics. Market changes and the orientation towards open access are in fact the initial short-term effect that, through their application and development, will become the final long- term effect. The scientific market imposed by Clarivate Analytics is limited, privileged, intended only for a certain number of researchers. There are also many inconsistencies in writing and quoting scientific publications, primarily related to economics. Clarivate Analytics standards have become a brake on the development of science, due to the closed approach it suffers criticism from important EU Impact and ambition Please address each guiding points presented in the Call document/Programme Guide under the award criterion ‘Impact’. Define the expected short, medium and long-term effects of the project. Who are the target groups? How will the target groups benefit concretely from the project and what would change for them?
Impact and ambition. Expected impacts as a result of this project: - Preparation of climate projections following IPCC AR6, more and improved climate services, tailor made guidelines on use of climate scenarios and other data as well as expert opinions (at least 6 in different areas) Impact and ambition Define the effects of the project (during the implementation and up to 5 years after its end). Be specific and provide information about impacts that are a result of your project, and separately, the impacts of the complementary measures and actions. In addition to the expected specific results, indicate the level or degree of implementation of the targeted plan/strategy/action plan that will be achieved through the SIP/SNAP project. Wherever possible, use quantified indicators and targets. Show the steps of your calculation and base yourself on the activities mentioned in your work plan. Justify and substantiate the baselines, benchmarks and assumptions you used, making reference to relevant publications, studies or statistics. Try to use the same methodologies for calculating impacts: (not different methodologies for each partner, region or country). Extrapolations should preferably be prepared by one partner. (n/a for concept note) Note: In addition to the description above, for stage 2 (full proposals) include quantified indicators in Part C of the application forms (both horizontal KPIs for the LIFE programme as well as any specific KPIs relevant to the proposal). Ensure correspondence between part B and part C. - Risk and vulnerability assessments for selected sectors (at least 6) - Established Climate Adaptation Center (CAC) at Slovenian Environment Agency - Working group on Adaptation in full operation at two levels of government - Established Local contact point for climate action in regions and municipalities (LCP) - More municipalities and regions joining Covenant of Mayors (at least 12) and Mission on Adaptation (at least 6), preparing, updating or implementing SECAPs - Setting up and maintaining an online Climate portal (CP) as a one-stop shop for a climate action related information, data and tools, with a forum for exchange, social media accounts and groups, and monthly newsletter - Implementation of measures (at least 3 per year, 18 overall) with multiple benefits across different SDGs and focus on increasing resilience - Preparation of NAP on the basis of sectoral risk and vulnerability assessments - Preparation and implementation of Communication strategy (1) ...
