Government response. The Contracting Officer shall promptly, within calendar days after receipt of notice, respond to the notice in writing. In responding, the Contracting Officer shall either--
Government response. (a) The Government may request further information which is reasonably necessary for clarification of the information provided by the Company under this Clause 5 and for the purposes of this Clause 5. The Company will provide such further information when so requested.
Government response. The Contracting Officer shall promptly, within 7 calendar days after receipt of notice, respond to the notice in writing. In responding, the Contracting Officer shall either -- (1) Confirm that the conduct of which the Contractor gave notice constitutes a change and when necessary direct the mode of further performance; (2) Countermand any communication regarded as a change; (3) Deny that the conduct of which the Contractor gave notice constitutes a change and when necessary direct the mode of further performance; or (4) In the event the Contractor’s notice information is inadequate to make a decision under subparagraphs (d)(1), (2), or (3) of this clause, advise the Contractor what additional information is required, and establish the date by which it should be furnished and the date thereafter by which the Government will respond. (e)
Government response. The correct attachment to submit questions related to the solicitation is Attachment 2, Question Template
Government response. The correct attachment for the Task Order Request and instructions is Attachment 3.
Government response. In accordance with the requirements denoted on DCAA website, contractors considering submitting a proposal in support of this requirement shall complete the “Pre-award Survey checklist, xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/Content/Documents/Preaward_Survey_of_Prospective_Contractor _Accounting_System_Checklist.pdf. to document how their accounting system is designed to meet the SF 1408 criteria. The completed checklist and SF-1408 shall be submitted to the local DCAA Branch Office before proposal submission. In addition, the contractor shall be in compliance with DFARS 252.215-7009 – Proposal Adequacy Checklist.
Government response a review, but no pause on negotiations As outlined in Xx Xxxxxxx’ evidence, Cabinet has agreed to conduct the review rec- ommended by the Trade for All Board; he anticipated ‘work on this review, which will involve a significant phase of engagement with Māori and wider public con- sultation, will begin as soon as possible’.121 The Minister’s response to the recom- mendation is appended to Xx Xxxxxxx’x brief of evidence, and reads: I agree in principle with the recommendation to review New Zealand’s wider policy settings that affect digital trade and support the digital economy. This will need to be assessed against ongoing negotiations and ongoing domestic development in this area.122 The response is categorised as agreeing ‘in principle’, with work on the recom- mendation ‘already under way or will be commenced immediately’.123 However, the second part of the Trade for All Board’s recommendation – to avoid Aotearoa New Zealand being locked into ‘fixed negotiating positions’ – has been interpreted by the claimants as recommending a pause on negotiations.124 The Crown stated this is incorrect, and highlighted that the recommendation’s opposition to ‘fixed nego- tiating positions’ implies ‘acceptance by the Trade for All Board of negotiations continuing in parallel with the review’.125 Nonetheless, the Minister’s response gave some insight into the prospect of pausing negotiations on e-commerce: ‘It is not in New Zealand’s interests to pause all negotiations on digital trade issues. I would expect, however, that the positions taken in ongoing negotiations would be informed by the review.’126 This aligns with the view advanced by Xx Xxxxxxx in his evidence. Xx Xxxxxxx argued that pausing negotiations would result in opportunity costs. First, he said, stepping away from important e-commerce negotiations with the European Union and United Kingdom while a review was undertaken would mean that there would be no guarantees Aotearoa New Zealand could ‘restart’ those negotiations; it would also suffer competitive disadvantages as other countries (for example, Australia) would have secured preferences into those markets.127 Xx Xxxxxxx also 120. Document b23, p 18 at [2] 121. Document c1, p 21 at [59]–[60] 122. Document c1(a), p 54 123. Ibid 124. Submission 3.3.63, pp 57–58 at [9.1], [9.5], [9.6] 125. Submission 3.3.61, pp 32–33 at [82] 126. Document c1(a), p 54 127. Transcript 4.1.9, p 285 Māori Interests in the Digital Domain
Government response. The Victorian and Commonwealth Governments jointly respond to the report prepared by the Independent Reviewer.
Government response. On 13 October, 2009, the State Emergency Committee issued Resolution # 5 and deployed a rapid response working group headed by Minister of Health. The Ministry of Health established four expert groups: Monitoring and evaluation of response activities, and rapid organization of medical emergency care; Clinical care; Epidemiology and virology teams; and the logistics, planning and coordination team. The Ministry of Health produced and distributed IEC materials for public, workplaces and all level health facilities. Clinical advisory team of MoH developed patient care advice that can be used in resource-limited settings. These include identification of early danger signs to help clinical diagnosis, early provision of supportive care, timely antiviral and antimicrobial therapy. Cabinet has approved a budget of
Government response. The Contracting Officer shall respond to the notice required by (b) above in writing. In such response, the Contracting Officer shall either;
