Ethics Statement Sample Clauses

Ethics Statement. The Fund will provide the Investment Manager with a copy of its policy relating to ethics and conflicts of interest which shall be adopted and incorporated by reference as Exhibit E

Ethics Statement. An ethics statement should be provided by the institute supporting the research proposed.

Ethics Statement. This project was reviewed and approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board (approval #: IRB00018856) under the Expedited review process per 45 CFR 46.110(3), Title 45 CFR Subpart D section 46.404, one parent consent, and 21 CFR 56.110 and the Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, which approved oral consent due to low literacy rates. All adult subjects provided informed consent, and a parent or guardian of any child participant provided informed consent on their behalf. Oral informed consent was obtained by trained local field assistants and documented by witnessed notation on IRB-approved enrollment forms. All animal use followed the guidelines of the Weatherall Report and the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals on the use of nonhuman primates in research, and was approved by the Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute and Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (permit number 2009-279-NA- 2009-184), and the Emory University Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol ID 087- 2009). Approval was also obtained from Tanzania National Parks (Permit number TNP/HQ/C10/13) to collect samples from wild chimpanzees. The researchers did not have any interactions with the chimpanzees in the park.

Ethics Statement. The use of data on this project strictly adhered to ethical standards required by the National Institute of Health (NIH). In addition to upholding ethical principles in con- ducting this work, we believe this work contributes to professional standards for rigor in the field. In particular, we expect that this paper will facilitate fair comparison of various annotation tasks or sys- tems and reduce random chance agreement caused by different annotation styles and metrics. Chance agreement can also be used as a quantitative aid to measure the difficulty of annotation task. This provides a new perspective for evaluating different annotation tasks. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computa- tional Linguistics, 34(4):555–596. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and et al. 2014. Developing lan- guage processing components with gate version 8. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇. 2018. Recognizing complex entity mentions: A review and future directions. In Proceedings of ACL 2018, Student Research Workshop, pages 37–44. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2010. Evaluating information extraction. In International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for Euro- pean Languages, pages 100–111. Springer.

Ethics Statement. The Investment Consultant acknowledges that the Board and the Fund are subject to the Illinois State Officials and Employees Ethics Act, 5 ILCS 430/1-1, et seq., and the Illinois Governmental Ethics Act, 5 ILCS 420/1- 101, et seq. (collectively, “Ethics Acts”). The Investment Consultant further acknowledges that the Fund has adopted an Ethics Policy, which is available on the Fund’s website (▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/investments/policies/) and is incorporated by reference. Investment Consultant shall, at all times, comply with all applicable provisions of the Ethics Acts and the Fund’s Ethics Policy, and shall promptly notify the Fund in the event that it believes that it has violated the Ethics Acts or the Ethics Policy.

Ethics Statement. The CoLaus Study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University of Lausanne.

Ethics Statement. The Harvard School of Medicine Institutional Review Board initially reviewed the methods for data collection in this study and found them exempt from a human subjects review; all data collection was performed by a separate entity, the Madagascar Institute of Statistics (INSTAT), and provided to the investigators with all individual identifiers removed from the dataset. All adult participants (≥ 15 years) provided verbal and written consent for themselves and their children, and all children 6-14 years of age additionally provided assent for study participation.

Ethics Statement. The use of data on this project strictly adhered to ethical standards required by the National Institute of Health (NIH). In addition to upholding ethical principles in con- ducting this work, we believe this work contributes to professional standards for rigor in the field. In particular, we expect that this paper will facilitate fair comparison of various annotation tasks or sys- tems and reduce random chance agreement caused by different annotation styles and metrics. Chance agreement can also be used as a quantitative aid to measure the difficulty of annotation task. This provides a new perspective for evaluating different annotation tasks.

Ethics Statement. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Dong-A University (IRB approval no., 2-1040709-AB-N-01- 202101-HR-003-02). The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived because participants took part in the activity as part of their educational curriculum. This was a retrospective exploratory study aiming to determine the interrater reliability of peer assessment.