Xxx et al Sample Clauses

Xxx et al. Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-00328-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “Xxxxxxx Litigation”; the Rostain Litigation, the Xxxxxxx Litigation, and the Xxxxx Litigation are referred to collectively herein as the “Litigation”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this order shall have the meaning assigned to them in the settlement agreement attached to the Motion (the “Settlement Agreement”). In the Motion, the Movants seek the Court’s approval of the terms of the Settlement, including entry of a bar order in the SEC Action (the “Bar Order”) and a final judgment and bar order in the Xxxxxxx Litigation (the “Judgment and Bar Order”). After reviewing the terms of the Settlement and considering the arguments presented in the Motion, the Court preliminarily approves the Settlement as adequate, fair, reasonable, and equitable. Accordingly, the Court enters this scheduling order to: (i) provide for notice of the terms of the Settlement, including the proposed Bar Order in the SEC Action and the proposed Judgment and Bar Order in the Xxxxxxx Litigation; (ii) set the deadline for filing objections to the Settlement, the Bar Order, the Judgment and Bar Order, or Movants’ request for approval of Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees; (iii) set the deadline for responding to any objection so filed; and (iv) set the date of the final approval hearing regarding the Settlement, the Bar Order in the SEC Action, the Judgment and Bar Order in the Xxxxxxx Litigation, and Xxxxxxx’ request for approval of Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees (the “Final Approval Hearing”), as follows: 1 Xxxx X. Xxxxxx signed the Settlement Agreement as chair of the Committee. Xx. Xxxxxx, the Court-appointed Examiner (the “Examiner”), also signed the Settlement Agreement in his capacity as Examiner solely to evidence his support and approval of the Settlement and to confirm his obligation to post the Notice on his website, but Xx. Xxxxxx as Examiner is not otherwise individually a party to the Settlement Agreement or any of the above-referenced litigation.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxx et al. (2018) estimated that there were 425 million cases of diabetes (8.8%) among adults aged 20–79 years in 2017. When the age range was extended to 18–99 years, this figure increased to 451 million (8.4%). However, by 2045, it is estimated that diabetes will affect 629 million people in the age group 20–79 years (9.9%), and 693 million in the age range 18–99 years (9.9%). Diabetes prevalence varies by age group, gender, World Bank income group, and geographical region. Xxx et al.,(2018) found that diabetes prevalence peaks at 22% in the 75–79 age group in high-income countries, at 19% in the 60–74 age group in middle-income countries and at 8% among the 55–64 age group in low-income countries. Diabetes prevalence is threefold greater in high-income countries than in low-income countries among 65–69-year-olds.
Sample 1Sample 2
Xxx et al. Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-0328 (N.D. Tex.) (the “Xxxxxxx Litigation” brought by individual plaintiffs herein referred to collectively as the “Xxxxxxx Investor Plaintiffs”) arise from a series of events leading to the collapse of Stanford International Bank, Ltd. (“SIBL”) and other companies owned or controlled by Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx (with SIBL, the “Stanford Entities”).2 On February 16, 2009, this Court appointed Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx to be the Receiver for the Stanford Entities. (ECF No. 10). After years of investigation, the Plaintiffs believe that they have identified claims against a number of third parties, including Trustmark, which Plaintiffs allege enabled the Stanford Ponzi scheme. In the Rotstain Litigation, the plaintiffs assert claims against Trustmark and other defendants for (1) aiding, abetting, or participation in violations of the Texas Securities Act (“TSA”) and (2) aiding, abetting, or participation in breach of fiduciary _________________________________
Sample 1
Xxx et al presented a novel approach to model and understand the relationships between customers and some web service providers [12].They attached a clear and concise definition of SLA in a highly competitive business environment where service providers are interested in gaining a good understanding of the relationship between what they could promise in an SLA and what their IT infrastructure is capable of delivering. This paper also mentioned some components of SLA such as purpose, parties, validity period, scope, SLA objectives, penalties, optional services, exclusions and administration. Finally, their research ends up with some web service composition with SLA modeling. Furthermore, they focused on information collection and analysis at the creation stages of SLAs and their result suggested that having information of impact of various service levels on business process would give SLA negotiators, human managers or automatic components, a clear picture of pros and cons of various SLOs in an SLA. This paper also introduced Dynamic service ranking concepts, which means that service providers rank its services based on customer’s real time needs. Also this ranking is done and available only for the customer who needs to sort out a web service from same service provider.
Sample 1
Xxx et al. 2007]. The generally enhanced availability of remote sensing data after major events may thereby provide a good starting point for sustainable, well planned image acquisition campaigns.
Sample 1
Xxx et al. DIV. ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------ DOMINION OKLAHOMA TEXAS PARTNERSHIP V. 02-02049 U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT, OPEN ENRON NORTH AMERICA, ET AL S.D. OF NEW YORK, MANHATTAN ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------ XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, ON BEHALF OF THE ENRON H-01-4128 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, OPEN CORP. SAVINGS PLAN AND ITS PARTICIPANTS, S.D. OF TEXAS, HOUSTON PLAINTIFF, V. ENRON CORPORATION, AN DIV. OREGON CORPORATION, XXXXXX X. XXXXXX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS # ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------ XXXXXXX XXXXX, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF 2001-54069 151ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OPEN ENRON CORP., PLAINTIFF X. XXXXXX X. COURT, XXXXXX COUNTY, BELFER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND ENRON TEXAS CORP., NOMINAL DEFENDANT # ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------ In re: ENRON CORP. Debtor, Case No. 01-16034 Entity # 2 SOFA EXHIBIT
Sample 1
Xxx et al. (Fed Ct. No. T-867-05) and Canada has appealed that judgment;
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Xxx et al

  • Xxxxxx et al Case No. 2:16-cv-10277. The Complaint, ECF No. 1, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the citizen-suit provision of the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-8(a);

  • Year 2000 Issues Each of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries has made a full and complete assessment of the Year 2000 Issues and has a realistic and achievable program for remediating the Year 2000 Issues on a timely basis. Based on such assessment and program, the Borrower does not reasonably anticipate that Year 2000 Issues will have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Adjustment of Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target Distribution Levels (a) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution, Third Target Distribution, Common Unit Arrearages and Cumulative Common Unit Arrearages shall be proportionately adjusted in the event of any distribution, combination or subdivision (whether effected by a distribution payable in Units or otherwise) of Units or other Partnership Securities in accordance with Section 5.10. In the event of a distribution of Available Cash that is deemed to be from Capital Surplus, the then applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall be adjusted proportionately downward to equal the product obtained by multiplying the otherwise applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, as the case may be, by a fraction of which the numerator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately after giving effect to such distribution and of which the denominator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately prior to giving effect to such distribution.

  • Commercial Price List Reductions Where NYS Net Prices are based on a discount from Contractor’s list prices, price decreases shall take effect automatically during the Contract term and apply to Purchase Orders submitted on or after the date Contractor lowers its pricing to its customers generally or to similarly situated government customers during the Contract term; or

  • Xxxxx, Esq Sher & Xxxxxxxxx LLP; 0000 X Xxxxxx, XX.; Xxxxx 000; Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000.

  • Xxxx X Xxxx, Chief Corporate Counsel of the Company, shall have furnished to the Representatives a written opinion or opinions, dated the Time of Delivery for such Designated Securities, in form and substance satisfactory to the Representatives, to the effect that:

  • Minimum Customer Support Requirements for TIPS Sales Vendor shall provide timely and commercially reasonable support for TIPS Sales or as agreed to in the applicable Supplemental Agreement.

  • XXXXEAS Employer is engaged in the telephone and telecommunication installation and service, and manufacture sale and installation of highway signs and traffic control products.

  • Xxx X XXXXXXX ---------------------------------- XXX X. XXXXXXX Notary Public, State of New York No. 02F14788741 Qualified in New York County Commission Expires August 31, 0000 XXXXX XX XXX XXXX : ss. COUNTY OF NEW YORK : BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 1 day of November, 1999, before me, the subscriber, personally appeared Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, who I am satisfied is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of XXXX CORPORATION OF CONNECTICUT, the corporation named in and subscribing to the foregoing instrument; and he, being by me duly sworn, acknowledged, deposed and said that such instrument was made by such corporation, and that he signed and delivered the same as such officer of such corporation as its voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein expressed.

  • Distribution of UDP and TCP queries DNS probes will send UDP or TCP “DNS test” approximating the distribution of these queries.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.