Stanford Entities means Robert Allen Stanford; James M. Davis; Laura Pendergest-Holt; Gilbert Lopez; Mark Kuhrt; SIB; Stanford Group Company; Stanford Capital Management, LLC; Stanford Financial Group; the Stanford Financial Bldg Inc.; the entities listed in Exhibit D to the Settlement Agreement [ECF No. ]; and any entity of any type that was owned, controlled by, or affiliated with Robert Allen Stanford, James M. Davis, Laura Pendergest-Holt, Gilbert Lopez, Mark Kuhrt, SIB, Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management, LLC, Stanford Financial Group, or the Stanford Financial Bldg Inc., on or before February 16, 2009.
Stanford Entities means Xxxxxx Xxxxx Stanford; Xxxxx X. Xxxxx; Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxx; Xxxxxxx Xxxxx; Xxxx Xxxxx; SIB; Stanford Group Company; Stanford Capital Management, LLC; Stanford Financial Group; the Stanford Financial Bldg Inc.; the entities listed in Exhibit D to this Agreement; and any entity of any type that was owned, controlled by, or affiliated with Xxxxxx Xxxxx Stanford, Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxx, SIB, Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management, LLC, Stanford Financial Group, or the Stanford Financial Bldg Inc., on or before February 16, 2009.
Stanford Entities means Robert Allen Stanford; James M. Davis; Laura
Examples of Stanford Entities in a sentence
The Receiver’s investigation to date reveals that revenue from the sale of fraudulent certificates of deposit (“CD Proceeds”) generated substantially all of the income for the Stanford Defendants and the many related Stanford Entities (collectively, the “Stanford Parties”).
According to Van Tassel, FTI “perform[ed] a variety of services, including assisting in the capture and safeguarding of electronic accounting and other records of the Stanford Entities, and forensic accounting analyses of those records, including cash tracing.”6 Van Tassel and FTI engaged in 18 months of detailed forensic investigation.
Accordingly, the Court finds that the Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of all Persons claiming an interest in, having authority over, or asserting a claim against Proskauer, the Stanford Entities, or the Receivership Estate, including but not limited to Plaintiffs and the Interested Parties.
Accordingly, the Court finds that the BMB Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of all Persons claiming an interest in, having authority over, or asserting a claim against any of the BMB Defendants and any of the BMB Released Parties, the Stanford Entities or the Receivership Estate, including but not limited to the Plaintiffs, the Claimants, and all other Interested Parties.
The BMB Defendants expressly deny any liability or wrongdoing with respect to the matters alleged in the complaints in the Troice Litigation, the Janvey Litigation, the Other BMB Litigation and any other claims related to the Stanford Entities.
More Definitions of Stanford Entities
Stanford Entities means Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx; Xxxxx X. Xxxxx; Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxx; Xxxxxxx Xxxxx; Xxxx Xxxxx; Xxxxx Xxxx; SIBL; Stanford Group Company; Stanford Capital Management, LLC (collectively, the “Stanford SEC Defendants”); Stanford Financial Group Ltd.; Bank of Antigua Limited; Stanford Bank (Panama), S.A.; the entities listed in Exhibit C to the Settlement Agreement (ECF No. ); and all entities the Stanford SEC Defendants owned or controlled as of February 16, 2009.
Stanford Entities means Stanford International Bank, Ltd.; Stanford Group Company; Stanford Capital Management, LLC; Stanford Financial Group; Stanford Trust Company; the Stanford Financial Building Inc.; the entities listed in Exhibit H to this Agreement; any entity of any type that was owned or controlled by Xxxxxx Xxxxx Stanford, Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxx, Stanford International Bank, Ltd., Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management, LLC, Stanford Financial Group, Stanford Trust Company, the Stanford Financial Building Inc., or the entities listed in Exhibit H, on or before February 16, 2009.
Stanford Entities means Robert Allen Stanford; James M. Davis; Laura Pendergest-Holt; Gilbert Lopez; Mark Kuhrt; Leroy King; SIBL; Stanford Group Company; Stanford Capital Management, LLC (collectively, the “Stanford SEC Defendants”); Stanford Financial Group Ltd.; Bank of Antigua Limited; Stanford Bank (Panama), S.A.; the entities listed in Exhibit C to the Settlement Agreement (ECF No. 3244 at 63–67); and all entities the Stanford SEC Defendants owned or controlled as of February 16, 2009.law.com/examiner-stanford-financial-group/) and the Receiver (http://www.stanfordfinancialreceivership.com); f) The Receiver will develop and submit to the Court for approval a plan for distributing the Net Settlement Amount (the “Distribution Plan”);g) Under the Distribution Plan, once approved, the Net Settlement Amount will be distributed by the Receiver, under the supervision of the Court, to Stanford Investors who have submitted Claims that have been allowed by the Receiver;h) Persons who accept funds from the Settlement Amount will, upon accepting the funds, fully release the HSBC Released Parties from any and all Settled Claims; and
Stanford Entities is defined in Paragraph 20 of the Agreement and Exhibit H to the Agreement. Paragraph 14 below. Accordingly, the Settlement is conditioned on the Court’s approval and entry of this Final Bar Order. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the terms of the Agreement are adequate, fair, reasonable, and equitable, and that it should be and is hereby APPROVED. The Court further finds that entry of this Final Bar Order is appropriate and that this Final Bar Order adequately addresses the issues with the original bar order identified by the Fifth Circuit. In particular, this Final Bar Order: (1) addresses the First Issue by permitting Individual Underwriters’ Insureds an opportunity to present a claim to proceeds of the settlement through the Receiver’s claims process; (2) addresses the Second Issue by exempting from the anti-suit injunction any extracontractual claim by an Individual Underwriters’ Insured; and (3) addresses the Third Issue by clarifying that the Order does not enjoin Stanford Investors from suing their Stanford brokers.
Stanford Entities is defined in Paragraph 20 of the Agreement and Exhibit H to the Agreement. Stanford Entities, save and except the Individual Underwriters’ Insureds’ extracontractual claims described in the second sentence of Paragraph 14 below. Accordingly, the Settlement is conditioned on the Court’s approval and entry of this Final Judgment and Bar Order. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the terms of the Agreement are adequate, fair, reasonable, and equitable, and that it should be and is hereby APPROVED. The Court further finds that entry of this Final Judgment and Bar Order is appropriate and that this Final Judgment and Bar Order adequately addresses the issues with the original bar order identified by the Fifth Circuit. In particular, this Final Judgment and Bar Order: (1) addresses the First Issue by permitting Individual Underwriters’ Insureds an opportunity to present a claim to proceeds of the settlement through the Receiver’s claims process; (2) addresses the Second Issue by exempting from the anti-suit injunction any extracontractual claim by an Individual Underwriters’ Insured; and (3) addresses the Third Issue by clarifying that the Order does not enjoin Stanford Investors from suing their Stanford brokers.
Stanford Entities is defined in Paragraph 20 of the Agreement and Exhibit H to the Agreement. described in the second sentence of Paragraph 14 below. Accordingly, the Settlement is conditioned on the Court’s approval and entry of this Judgment and Bar Order. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the terms of the Agreement are adequate, fair, reasonable, and equitable, and that it should be and is hereby APPROVED. The Court further finds that entry of this Judgment and Bar Order is appropriate and that this Judgment and Bar Order adequately addresses the issues with the original bar order identified by the Fifth Circuit. In particular, this Judgment and Bar Order: (1) addresses the First Issue by permitting Individual Underwriters’ Insureds an opportunity to present a claim to proceeds of the settlement through the Receiver’s claims process; (2) addresses the Second Issue by exempting from the anti-suit injunction any extracontractual claim by an Individual Underwriters’ Insured; and (3) addresses the Third Issue by clarifying that the Order does not enjoin Stanford Investors from suing their Stanford brokers.
Stanford Entities means Robert Allen Stanford; James M. Davis; Laura Pendergest-Holt; Gilbert Lopez; Mark Kuhrt; Leroy King; SIBL; Stanford Group Company; Stanford Capital Management, LLC (collectively, the “Stanford SEC Defendants”); Stanford Financial Group Ltd.; Bank of Antigua Limited; Stanford Bank (Panama), S.A.; the entities listed in Exhibit C to the Settlement Agreement (ECF No. ); and all entities the Stanford SEC Defendants owned or controlled as of February 16, 2009.